|
| | 09/05/02 Fire Ted Benavides, Now!
What would happen if you told your boss he had no guts because he was rejecting
a plan you wanted to implement? What would happen if you told your boss he
had no guts in front of other directors or managers? What would happen if
you told your boss he had no guts in front of television cameras and reporters?
If you managed to keep your job after the first scenario, you would not expect a
Christmas bonus, and you would be walking on egg shells for awhile. If you
pulled that stunt in front of other staff, you would be very unlikely to keep
your job, but you might be allowed to "resign". If you pulled
that stunt in front of the media, you would be fired -- unless you are related
to the owner of the company. Last week, when Councilman Mitch Rasansky
said any CEO delivering a budget with a $95 million shortfall would be fired by
any board of directors, most of the civilian city employees in
the audience applauded.
The City MisManager must have been seething all week and waiting for his little
"impromptu" temper tantrum. I bet he alerted some of the council
crooks to be ready. The CMM looked so smug and pleased with himself.
I for one was not happy to see our Mayor appearing to console Benavides, when
she should have taken him into Executive Session and fired him on the
spot. Unfortunately, she is just one vote, and the rest of the council are
so jealous of her and Rasansky they would keep Benavides if he was caught with
public money in his pocket. Just letting millions of our public money get
diverted to billionaires is not enough of a reason to fire him.
|
Last year, while Con Jerk (Ron Kirk to the rest of state) was still our
money-grubbing mayor, Councilman Mitch Rasansky told both Ted Benavides and Ron
Kirk that the estimates for sales tax revenue was way too optimistic and we
needed to be cutting back our expenses. That was last year in the budget
process. Ron Kirk who wants to be a Senator (God Save Us!) and touts his Dallas record
dismissed what Rasansky had to say. Ted Benavides knew Rasansky was
telling the truth. If he didn't know, Benavides is an idiot and should be
fired. If he did know and did nothing to alleviate some of the pending
deficit, Benavides is incompetent and should be fired.
|
Neil
Planick:
If Dallas had a $100-million budget SURPLUS now, I wonder if Ron
Kirk would take responsibility for THAT?
You bet he would. And the excuses of "falling sales tax
revenue" and "increased expenses" as the cause of the
current budget mess are totally bogus.
Every organization (every-ONE, actually) has to make
forecasts about the future and adjust their plans accordingly.
Who was in charge last budget year when these forecasts were
made? Ron Kirk and Ted "Bankrupt" Benavides.
Cornyn has just got to hammer away at Kirk's Dallas record
and not let him get away with spinning this fiasco into something good,
or at the least something they were helpless to prevent.
That's the key to Senate, in my opinion. |
The City MisManager should be fired.
Ted Benavides makes nearly $250,000 annually. That's 1/4 of a million
dollars a year. That is not a reward for long term service. That
salary is based on performance and delivering a well run city. On both
counts, Benavides has failed miserably and should be fired.
Look who hired Ted Benavides -- Ron Kirk. If he couldn't have a smart
fellow con man like John Ware, Con Jerk wanted someone he could push
around. That was the appeal of Benavides. All the stuff we heard
about what a good job he did in Denton? It was so we would take him off
their hands. Benavides left Denton in much the mess Dallas is in today.
Con Jerk is out on the Senate campaign. He made a recent stop in *and
encouraged the people there to call their friends in Dallas to see what a good
job he did in Dallas.

|
Kirk
seeks votes in West Texas
By D. Lance
Lunsford , Midland Reporter-Telegram - 09/03/2002
MIDLAND,
TEXAS (MRT) |
.
. ."One of the true signs of how good you are doing is how bad your
opponent talks about you," Kirk said, referring to Cornyn's recent
television advertisements as "negative."
Cornyn's campaign shot back Monday afternoon.
"(The advertisements) deal with issues, which (Kirk) does
not want to talk about. His stance is far from Texans on most
issues," said Dave Beckwith, Cornyn's campaign communication
director.. . .
Kirk, a former lobbyist for the city of Dallas before serving for six
years as mayor, rubbed elbows with a message of hope in Odessa among
labor union members.
"Labor doesn't hate big business. They just want at least
someone out there looking out for the little guy," Kirk said. . . .
"He tries to shift with the wind. He can't say what a
miracle job he did in Dallas now because it has such a huge budget
shortfall from excessive spending," Beckwith said. . . .
As Kirk narrowed focus on his record as the mayor of Dallas, he
encouraged West Texans to call friends and family who live in Dallas and
ask about his performance as mayor.
"I'm not afraid of you to make that call. I want you to make
that call," Kirk said at both appearances. . . . .
?MyWestTexas.com 2002 |
Why don't you drop them a line at their e-mail response address: samb@texasonline.net?
One of the people in the crowd did make a call to a friend in Dallas -- that
friend was Jesse Diaz. Here is Jesse's response:
JESSE
DIAZ
8127
Bruton Road, Texas 75217
Business: (214) 381-7777 Cellular: (214)
228-6778 Fax: (214) 381-9897
Email: Diazjesse@aol.com
September 3, 2002
Letters From Readers
Midland Reporter Telegram Newspaper
201 East Illinois Street
Midland, Texas 79701
Fax: (915) 570-7650
Re: "Kirk seeks votes in West Texas" - Article by D. Lance
Lunsford, September 3, 2002
I received a call from a friend and fellow LULAC brother from Midland,
TX yesterday. He called to ask what I thought about U.S. Senate
candidate Ron Kirk's performance when he was mayor for the City of
Dallas.
I informed my friend that as mayor for the City of Dallas, Ron Kirk had
an opportunity to lead the way toward establishing a strong ethics code
that would require disclosure of vital information such as corporate
contributions to one's own personal finances. Under Ron Kirk's
leadership, Kirk made sure the City of Dallas' Ethics Code rules
provided no detailed disclosure. The new code of ethics was so weak,
Kirk was able to hide his $200,000+ annual compensation from his law
firm and avoid disclosure of stock option remuneration that may have
brought more than $1 million to Ron Kirk and his wife, Matrice, while he
was mayor.
In less than one year since Ron Kirk resigned as mayor of the City of
Dallas our citizens are now saddled with a budget shortfall of almost
$100 million and now we're facing the prospect of a tax increase further
placing a burden on our citizens at an inopportune time.
My friend asked whom I would support between Ron Kirk and John Cornyn.
My response was as the founding member and officer of Dallas LULAC
Council 4496 I cannot endorse a candidate for political office but as
private citizen, life-long native born resident of Dallas County,
life-long Democrat, and small (Diaz Realtors) business owner, I proudly
told my friend I had already made my choice. I am supporting the
candidate who already publicly released his campaign contributions to
his campaign, personal account, and released to the public eight years
of his previous federal income tax returns, that person is John Cornyn.
I truly believe John Cornyn will remain a true conservative yet
compassionate when addressing the many needs of all Texans.
Sincerely,
Jesse Diaz |
Well, well!
And speaking of wells, we are bone dry in our municipal well. Thanks to
Ron Kirk. We had a surplus and an emergency fund when Kirk's reign of
terror began. We now have a $95 million shortfall. That is Ron
Kirk's fault and it is Ted Benavides' fault.
Ron Kirk kept forcing through
tax abatements for his friends and benefactors throughout his term. A
million here, a million there, and pretty soon you have a $95 million budget
shortfall.
These are desperate times in this city, and we might as well face the
facts. Ron Kirk and Ted Benavides and his predecessor John Ware have given
away the farm, but we have to feel and care for the livestock.
|
 |
One measure on the table is to do away with employee SIP bonus. If it
smells like a duck and walks like a duck . . . . In this case, it's a
Christmas bonus. If you get a bonus at Christmas, it's a Christmas bonus. If that bonus
comes to you at Christmas because you hung around another year, it's a Christmas
bonus. Companies all over the country are eliminating Christmas bonuses
this year because they are struggling to keep their doors open. It doesn't
mean they don't value their employees; it means they want to keep their doors
open so they keep the jobs for their employees.
All those truckers from Consolidated are looking for jobs and insurance.
Their bosses could not keep the doors open. City hall employees must get
over the idea that anything is permanent.
The civilian employees are furious with Mayor Miller for proposing and backing
the plan to eliminate the SIP bonuses. Their wrath is misdirected.
They should be mad at Ted Benavides.
There is also talk of charging employees for coverage of their spouse.
That's what happens in the private sector. If your employer pays your
insurance premium for your spouse's coverage, you are really lucky. Many
firms are offering group policies, but the employees pay the premium in toto.
Why should a married employee cost the city twice what the city pays for
coverage on a single employee? Just having a guaranteed policy at a
reasonable premium is more than most of us can hope for.
My health insurance policy is now in the $500+ a month range, and I have no
health problems. It is a triple whammy to get no raise, to lose your
Christmas bonus and get your insurance premiums increased, but that's what
people in the private sector are facing, as well.
We could save several millions by eliminating the premium for spouses. It
is still an incredible benefit to have a good group policy available to
you. Many, many employees in the private sector cannot get coverage
through their employer at any rate.
The city council is supposed to see their job as that of a member of a Board of
Directors. They are supposed to be looking out for Dallas residents and
taxpayers first. Just like a corporate Board of Directors is supposed to
protect the interests of the shareholders and the company before all else.
If you don't want to be an employee, start your own business like I did in the
late 80's. You quickly learn you have to pay Social Security and Medicare
on both sides. You have to join associations so you can get reasonable
health insurance, and then they start raising your premiums on a monthly
basis. You have no vacation or sick leave -- if you don't work, you don't
generate revenue. You most certainly cannot tell a client he has no guts.
 |
Benavides
says council needs 'guts' to balance Dallas budget
09/05/2002
By DAVE MICHAELS / The Dallas Morning
News |
Members
wrestle with tax hike while trying to make up $95 million
Dallas
City Manager Ted Benavides issued an unusually sharp rebuke of his bosses
? the City Council ? on Wednesday, saying they did not have "the
guts" to make cuts that would balance the budget without a tax
increase. . . .
The higher tax rate
would generate an additional $22 million for the city treasury. Mr.
Benavides and the council are struggling to make up about $95 million in
next year's budget, a shortfall caused principally by declining sales tax
receipts and growing salary costs.
. . .
Mr.
Rasansky, who has been the city manager's most outspoken critic, accused
Mr. Benavides of settling for an unnecessary tax increase.
Mr. Benavides, who often suffers public criticism
without responding, fired back a rejoinder that caught some council
members off guard.
"The modest reductions we made in this budget, you can't
even stand those," he said. "You don't have any guts.
"You don't want to hear what I have to say, which is
you've got to make some tough choices. If you didn't get elected to make
choices, why did you bother getting on the council?"
Then the council rebelled last month when Mr. Benavides
issued his proposed budget, which included a tax rate increase of 5
percent, 213 layoffs and a reduction of recreation center and library
hours. . . . |
If you saw Benavides' temper tantrum on
television, you heard the likes of James Fantroy cheering him on. Beat
that Indictment Fantroy has a real problem with authority and legal
niceties. That should not be surprising seeing how he is a prodigy of Old
Al Lipscomb. That bribe taking non-exonerated former councilman, Old Al
Lipscomb. Fantroy hates our Mayor, Fantroy resents Mitch Rasansky.
They both stand for integrity and looking out for interests, not to line their
own pockets. That is just a concept of public service beyond BTI Fantroy's
limited comprehensive abilities.
Mitch Rasansky is the best council member at City Hall. His townhall
meetings are packed with his own constituents and hundreds from all over
town. He is like our second mayor. He tells us the truth. Even
when I disagree with Councilman Rasansky, I know his heart is in the right
place. According to Michaels' story: When
Mr. Benavides stopped himself, some council members applauded his scolding of
Mr. Rasansky. James Fantroy said, "What you are saying needs to be
said." Where
does a bum like Fantroy get off lecturing Mitch Rasansky? Don't you just
wonder if there is a bottom to the well of Fantroy's worthliness? We
haven't reached it yet, but we sure are at the bottom of the city's financial
well.
Mitch Rasansky
said what needed to be said at last week's council meeting. Ted Benavides
needs to be fired. | |

|