|
Alejandro Gordon James Finkelman's Revenge?
| | 09/02/02 Hardly
Exoneration, more like Absolution
Old Al Lipscomb gets another break, but that does not make him innocent.
Webster's
New World Dictionary defines
"exonerate" as "to
prove to be not guilty; declare to be innocent"
and
"absolution" as
"a freeing
from guilt or from punishment for sin."
No
one proved Al Lipscomb was not guilty. The only one who has
declared him innocent is Old Al himself, and he is a convicted liar and
bribe taker.
Old Al was convicted by a jury panel of Texans, his peers.
Old Al has been spared additional punishment, but he has not been found
innocent. He took $7,700 to sell out Bachman-NW Highway.
He's never been tried for that at all.
|
After
last Friday's decision came to let Old Al off the hook, my husband and I
were talking about it. We both agreed the prosecutor should have asked
for a change of venue. That would have prevented the loophole that
allowed the case to be overturned. My husband reminded me that at the
time Paul Coggins' wife, Regina Montoya, was running for the House seat
in our district. Coggins probably figured she would lose minority
support if he asked for a change of venue. Isn't politics interesting?
Linda Helton |
U.S. Atty. Jane Boyle made it quite clear
her decision not to prosecute Old Al was based on time served and cost of a new
trial - not on a lack of evidence and certainly not on Old Al's innocence.
 |
Lipscomb
'free and clear' Bribery
retrial wouldn't serve justice, U.S. attorney says
08/31/2002
By TODD BENSMAN / The Dallas Morning
News |
U.S. Attorney Jane Boyle announced Friday that she would not retry former
Dallas City Council member Al Lipscomb on bribery charges, in spite of
what she called overwhelming evidence of corruption. . . . Mr.
Lipscomb's record is now clean: he can vote and run for public office
again, his attorney said. . . . She [U.S. Atty. Boyle]
also said her decision to dismiss the charges . .
. should not be viewed as exoneration. . . .
Mr. Lipscomb's attorney, Shirley Baccus-Lobel, said the decision
was the best possible outcome for her client but she disagreed with Ms.
Boyle's characterization of Mr. Lipscomb as corrupt.
"That is her perspective, and she is certainly within her
rights to convey that perspective," Ms. Baccus-Lobel said. "That
is not my perspective. . . . |
How does Old Al have the audacity to declare
himself exonerated? Well, he's Old Al, after all. He's the same Old
Al who took $7,700 from Nick Rizos and made a certain "high ranking police
officer" (can you spell B-O-L-T-O-N?) order police officers out of the NW
Substation to "lay off" enforcement in the sex clubs on NW
Highway. He sold us out for so little, but the cost to my community was
huge. Ask Roxan and Randy Staff if what Old Al did to us was
insignificant. Drive down NW Highway and look at the remnants of Old Al's
wrongdoing. Caligula Rizos old club burned down, but not to worry. A
confessed council briber has another sex club -- The Lodge -- on NW Hwy., as
well as Stratos on NW Hwy. Nobody EXONERATED Old Al or Caligula Rizos.
They just didn't prosecute Old Al for that bribe, and Caligula Rizos got a walk
for testifying about it.
Old Al is claiming EXONERATION, but for Bachman-NW Hwy., it's NO JUSTICE.
Todd Bensman is one of the few "reporters" left at The
Dallas Managed News. He
knows the players. The people he quotes are telling:
 |
Lipscomb
'free and clear' Bribery
retrial wouldn't serve justice, U.S. attorney says
08/31/2002
By TODD
BENSMAN / The Dallas Morning News |
Former Dallas FBI Special Agent in Charge Danny Defenbaugh, who oversaw
the Lipscomb investigation, said, "He's not worth commenting
on." . . .
One former city council member who served with Mr. Lipscomb said
the U.S. Attorney's decision as a way to dodge a politically damaging
racial backlash from the black community. Ms. Boyle was sworn in as the
department of justice's top North Texas prosecutor this year.
"It was done more in the interest of spinelessness than in the
interest of justice," said Donna Blumer.
"I think she absolutely caved on this. This was her first real test
and, in my opinion, she's failed it. She should not let these charges be
dropped." . . .
City council member Veletta Forsythe Lill said
. . . "I think this will be an unsatisfying end for many, many folks,
including the defendant," Ms. Lill said. "I'm a little surprised
that she chose not to retry. I just thought she might feel the need for
some kind of closure."
Mr. Hill said he never believed that
Mr. Lipscomb was guilty of bribery. . . . "But I genuinely
believe that he did not possess the criminal intent to be convicted."
Mr. Lipscomb remains the "pre-eminent leader in our
community" and will be sought out for his "wisdom and
knowledge," he said. |
What does Old Al say?
 |
Lipscomb
'free and clear' Bribery
retrial wouldn't serve justice, U.S. attorney says
08/31/2002
By TODD BENSMAN / The Dallas Morning
News |
"Exoneration, exoneration, exoneration," Mr. Lipscomb said,
. . . Mr. Lipscomb said he has no plans to run for
political office again, . . . He has accepted a
job with the counseling organization Mothers (and Fathers) for the
Advancement of Social Systems. . . .
Mr. Lipscomb also said he will campaign for Democratic candidates
Ron Kirk for U.S. Senate and Tony Sanchez for governor. Friday, he wore a
Kirk sticker and a Sanchez button on his T-shirt. . .
. |
That's the new political ticket. Bribe
takers and graft takers must stick together. Regarding the arrangement
between Ron and Matrice Kirk and Tom Hicks, somebody should be going to trial, but that's
not the case. Too much publicity. Too much money. Too much
political positioning at stake. How come all you Democrats who were so
appalled when this came out about the Kirk/Hicks stock options are supporting
Ron Kirk? Where are your principles and sense of justice?
Elections - AP Senate
Democrats
Covet Texas Senate Seat
Sun Sep 1, 2002
By RON FOURNIER, Associated Press Writer |
 |
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - Democrats
could embarrass President Bush ( news
- web
sites) with a Texas-sized victory in his home state this
fall, but only if Senate candidate Ron Kirk avoids more scenes
like this: Five angry cops, one cagey rival and a bank of TV
cameras watching Kirk grovel.
"I apologize," Kirk said, nervously twisting the
knot in his tie.
Leaders of a state police organization . . .
. He wanted their endorsement.
They wanted to know why he had criticized his opponent for
insisting on the death penalty for a convicted cop killer.
"I think that may have offended some of you," Kirk
said. "It was more political than thoughtful."
Kirk . . . is boundlessly affable, a man with a deep laugh and an
unquenchable thirst to shake hands, trade jokes and make friends
? even among foes.
Cornyn . . . impressed the police by moving comfortably from issue
to issue, layering his talk with specifics.
Smooth as Cornyn was bland, Kirk danced away from details or
commitments on police matters. . . . the Democrat tried to sidestep questions
about Bush's tax cuts ? "It is confusing. I don't like to
be hemmed into a box" . . . . |
Does that just make you sick? It is confusing. I don't like to
be hemmed into a box. Ron
Kirk does not like having to tell the truth or play straight or deal with common
folks.
 |
As
mayor, when did you ever see Ron Kirk in an open shirt sans tie, much
less at a union rally?.
Ron Kirk opposed collective bargaining for Police
and firefighters.
They are forbidden to strike under Federal law, but he would not even
talk with their union leaders. |
We know what a jerk Kirk is. We know
Kirk sold us out on the arena deal for his wife's stock options. Why
aren't Mr. & Mrs. Kirk being prosecuted? Why are Democrats who fought
that Bad Deal now supporting Ron Kirk?
Then there's Lounge Lizard Rojas getting more of our money, when he's the bad
guy. It's understandable that we could have won that lawsuit and
spent a lot more money in legal fees getting a moral victory. We certainly
could not have made Rojas pay us for our costs because he has no money.
But, it doesn't feel right to be giving that Lounge Lizard $135,000.
Dr.
Lois Parrott was fulfilling her fiduciary duties as a DISD Trustee when she
questioned his use of DISD issued credit cards, but that was not his only issue
against Dr. Parrott.
 |
DISD
settles with Rojas for $135,000
Agreement
resolves ex-superintendent's defamation lawsuit
08/31/2002
By TAWNELL D. HOBBS / The Dallas
Morning News |
. . . The
Dallas school board agreed Friday to give the former superintendent
$135,000 to drop his defamation lawsuit against two trustees. Dr. Rojas
also will receive $90,000 in severance pay that has been held up in
escrow. . . . District officials say paying their
former leader was cheaper than battling him in court. .
. . Jeff Tillotson, Dr. Rojas' attorney, said
. . . . "He's happy to have this part of his life
over," he said. "He was profoundly disappointed in the way
things turned out. He wishes the board of trustees and Dr. Moses
well." . . .
Dr. Rojas also alleged that trustees Hollis Brashear and Lois
Parrott had defamed him by publicly accusing him of misusing a
district-issued credit card for alcohol, personal trips and other
wrongdoing. . . . "He believes that
he's been tarnished because anytime he applies for or seeks a position in
the education field people say, 'Yeah, you're the guy who went through the
stuff in Dallas.' " |
Lounge Lizard Rojas can't get a job because
he left behind chaos and deficits in several school districts where he was hired
to bring order and stability. Compared to the things in print in San
Francisco (search for "Rojas" to get links to those stories), anything
Brashear or Parrott may have said about Rojas would be considered
complimentary.
Here's my problem with all this. We are selling out
justice for cost efficiency. In the DISD/Rojas situation, that East
Coast bum loaded up the administration with his gang from California at
incredibly high salaries. He pushed the Edison Project through, and that
has turned out to be a mistake. He did charge alcohol on his DISD
card. It doesn't matter if the Lounge Lizard reimbursed us for it or
not. He knew the rules. He could have used his own credit card to
buy his drinks. He's a Ph.D. He ought to be able to read the name on
a credit card.
The Trustees did the right thing by settling with Lounge Lizard, but it doesn't
feel right.
It just doesn't feel as wrong as letting Old Al get away with taking bribes from
at least two different bribers -- and getting away with it.
It was bad enough a bribe taker was serving his term at home in front of a big
screen TV in new room added to his house by his friends. What makes it
impossible to accept is his absolute lack of shame. Having an elected
official make a statement that he never believed Lipscomb was guilty of bribery
when even Old Al admitted that he did, is impossible to accept. What kind
of a message is Councilman Don Hill (an attorney no less) sending to
African-American youth? For that matter, what kind of a message is the
U.S. Atty. sending to all young people.
If you follow U.S. Atty. Jane Boyle's
logic, unless a case can be tried quickly with no publicity, no trial.
That means no elected official will ever be tried for anything -- well, maybe
murder. That's not O.K.
Sometimes, you have to take a
stand for justice, but you need a real prosecutor to get that done. We
apparently don't have one in our new U.S. Attorney.
| |

|