|
Officer M Gordon James
| | 06/03/02 We're broke, and it ain't OK!
We are laying off employees when we don't have enough staff to enforce current city
ordinances. Those we keep may get a 10% pay cut, but last week 9 council
crooks signed away $43 Million in future property tax revenue to Hicks and Ross,
Jr. and a California
Dude.
If you did not see Colleen McCain Nelson's story, you should stop and read it
before you go further:
 |
City
predicts $83 million shortfall
'We're
all going to have to share this pain,' council member warns
06/01/2002
By COLLEEN McCAIN NELSON / The
Dallas Morning News |
| . . .Council member
Alan Walne cautioned that even without a tax increase, many homeowners
will pay more in property taxes because of an increase in property
values. . . . |
Like he cares about the plight of Dallas
homeowners! Duh Alan Walne knows we "will pay more in property
taxes" because he and other council crooks have continuously voted for tax
abatements removing millions and millions from current and future property tax
revenue with little or nothing in return.
For instance, Mark Cuban's Yahoo/Broadcast.com received almost $4 Million in TWO
tax abatements JUST TO STAY IN DEEP ELLUM, when they were looking at a site
INSIDE Dallas city limits up at Webb Chapel near LBJ in an old shopping center
that had been specifically refurbished and redeveloped for Yahoo, where they
would pay PROPERTY TAX. They were supposed to hire several new employees
in return for the first tax abatement -- didn't happen. The very next year
they came back for $2 Million more because they had decided to put an atrium in
their first building and take over a second building in Deep Ellum to house
their new hires -- which were non-existent. They promised to hire 600
employees -- didn't happen. As a matter of fact, just a few months after
Send Me Some Money John Loza asked them to come back the next year for a THIRD
tax abatement, they laid off over 100 employees.
Did anyone at City Hall consider canceling Yahoo's tax abatement because they
had failed to perform? You know the answer to that!
Another company got a tax abatement to STAY in their location near NorthPark.
Hicks and Ross, Jr. got a $23 Million tax abatement just a few months after they
had Kathy Nealy steal enough mail-in ballot votes to get them just over 50.1% of
the votes in the 1998 arena sales tax election.
No one goes
back and pulls these tax abatements when the recipient fails to perform.
Speaking of mail-in ballot vote frauds --- If Kathy Nealy is the Queen of this
sleazy business, Federal employee Joe May is her biggest rival. Joe
May is an idiot savant, who can't come in out of the rain but he has an
effective team of thugs to work elderly voters and get them to hand over their
ballots to him. In a story in the Dallas
Observer, Joe May showed
Patrick Williams a copy of Pete Vaca's application for a mail-in ballot which
had been given to someone else who claimed not to be working with May. It
was illegal for May to have that application, much less show it to anyone other
than a County Elections official, but no one prosecuted.
 |
Buzz
By Patrick Williams April 8, 1999 |
Model
citizen, part II
Vaca's pre-election drive to become a better citizen
didn't stop with his paid-up tax bill. He also vowed to vote. If he
serves on a jury and donates blood, he'll get Buzz's vote for citizen of
the year.
There's one problem, though: Who does Vaca plan to
vote for?
A few weeks ago, before Vaca announced his candidacy, political
operative Joe May's street-level get-out-the-vote drive was knocking on
doors in East Dallas, giving people forms they need to receive mail-in
absentee ballots. The volunteers asked voters to cast their ballot for
Loza. They found Vaca, who eagerly pledged to vote for John Loza, May
says. Vaca's wife also agreed to vote for Loza. Apparently, at least one
of them has had a change of heart.
A
gleeful May, who is helping manage Loza's campaign against Vaca, faxed
Buzz a copy of the couple's ballot applications. (Buzz loves election
season. Everyone gets so nasty.) May joked that the Vacas "owe us
66 cents for postage" for sending in their forms. |
Now, Pete Vaca and Joe May are both running for the School Board from District
8.
 |
DISD
contests start to take shape 06/03/2002
By TAWNELL D. HOBBS /
The Dallas Morning News |
In District 8, Ms. Leos is vacating her post after seven years to accept
an appointment under U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige. Competing
for her seat is mediator Pete Vaca and business development specialist
Joe May, both of whom rallied for a third Latino-majority seat in the
redistricting process.
Mr. Vaca won a lawsuit against the district
after contending that the redistricting process was flawed. Mr. May's
involvement stems from his creation of a map that called for a third
majority-Latino seat. |
Talk about between a rock and a hard place. Neither one of these guys has
any business running for office or making decisions on budgets or policy or the
time of day. I worked in Pete Vaca's campaign against John Loza -- kept
the books as a matter of fact, among lots of other stuff. His best asset
is his wife, and she's not running. The biggest job the people who were
doing the real work in the campaign had was to keep Pete from meeting anyone
important and to get him out to campaign. Vaca would be Leo Chaney's
equivalent on the School Board, but Joe May as an elected official makes Pete
Vaca look much better with all of his warts and baggage. Surely, there is
someone else!
There is some good news! School Boards cannot participate in tax
abatements anymore, which brings us back to our current crisis at City Hall.
District 13 Councilman Mitch Rasansky told his townhall gathering (over 200
people) that existing tax abatements are costing us over $9 Million a year in
lost property tax revenue. You will hear council members like Ed Oakley
claim that tax abatements don't cost us anything, which is a good example of how
uninformed he and many on the council are. If a property is worth $200
million with its improvements, but is only taxed at its raw land value of $1-2
million, that's millions in lost property tax revenue. Yes, the property
owner is taxing himself and supposed to be making infrastructure improvements
with the WITHHELD PROPERTY TAX REVENUE, but that means he gets to move his
property needs ahead of your neighborhood's needs.
While you get taxed through the nose, but must wait in line to get your street
paved or street lighting for security, Tom Hicks and Ross Perot, Jr. get to
withhold what should rightfully go into the general budget for the entire
community's needs and spend it inside the lines of their own property. If
you are one of those like Duh Walne or Oakley or Send Me Some Money Loza or Beat
that Indictment Fantroy or Mayor PreTend Poss who think the rich are better than
the rest of us and their needs should go before everyone else, then you likely
think bankrupting the city to accommodate Hicks and Ross, Jr., et al is
appropriate.
I say NO MORE TAX ABATEMENTS!!
I say AUDIT EVERY CURRENT TAX ABATEMENT!!
I say make every NON-COMPLYING TAX ABATEMENT RECIPIENT RETURN OUR MONEY or the
city confiscates the improvements for back taxes!! Just like they would do
to some poor widow in South Dallas or my neighborhood!!
We are in big trouble. We have the worst City Manager in our history, but
who could we get to come into this city to take over that job? There are
only so many good guys like Mike Moses out there -- there are many, many like
Ted Benavides available or worse like Lounge Lizard Bill Rojas.
Is Ted Benavides going to get a 10% pay cut? Can't you hear the council
already telling him what a good job he has done and how he deserves a raise and
a bonus?
Our finances are in such a mess that we cannot attract a quality candidate for
City Manager. Until last week when Asst. CM Jill Jordan dropped that bomb
on the Mayor about historic preservation issues preventing running all proposed
Trinity roads on the Downtown side, she would have been my choice among city
hall staff to be moved up to CM. She is an engineer, but she is also a
well rounded bureaucrat. Unfortunately, she showed herself to be a puppet
of Our Downtown Betters who want the Trinity Project just like THEY DREW
IT. There is big money moving on this Trinity Project, and some of
the ODB are desperate that they be the ones who spend it.
We should just stop
everything for awhile.
We should not accept any donations of public facilities that we cannot afford to
maintain once we are the property owners. When we get that property, it
goes OFF THE TAX ROLLS like the Hicks/Perot arena. We spend millions
annually maintaining the Meyerson. We don't have millions to spare.
We certainly should not be participating in a new performance hall and
absolutely should not be the ultimate owners of that facility. If there is
a demand for an opera hall, the market will cover it. It is not your or my
responsibility to provide a facility for Park Cities taxpayers to go and
recreate. Keep that property on the tax rolls!
We should immediately audit every current tax abatement and pull any that are
not in full-compliance with the agreement the recipient made with the
city. Unfortunately, many of the agreements are so loosey-goosey that the
recipient pretty much gets the tax abatement and doesn't have to do a
thing. Between John Ware and Ted Benavides, the City MisManager's Office
has given away the farm and all future crops, and we are stuck with the
livestock for which we have to buy feed and hire someone to protect!
When a new office building is constructed, there are new demands on our general
budget -- police and fire protection, water/sewer, street maintenance, traffic
control, etc. When a tax abatement removes new improvements from the tax
rolls, there is no additional money to pay for the new drains on the general
budget -- like at Pinnacle Park. That project was going to get done
without a tax abatement. Hunt has the resources to pay for their own
police department -- but why spend Hunt money when you can drain the city
budget?
The only council members who have a right to comment on the disastrous $83
million shortfall we are facing are those who voted against the Palladium
abatement -- Mayor Laura Miller, Mark Housewright, Sandy Greyson, Lois
Finkelman, Mitch Rasansky and Velleta Lill. The other 9 are less
than blithering idiots -- they are crooks. They all had something to gain,
whether social or financial from backing that $43 million tax abatement.
None of the 9 who voted for it should dare open their mouths about our budget
shortfall -- particularly Duh Walne or Mayor PreTend Poss or Ed Oakley.
They are more responsible for it than almost anyone else.
City MisManager Benavides told McCain Nelson that "It's just disappointing
that we can't seem to find the bottom." It would be nice to have a
City Manager with a plan to make things happen instead of one who wrings his
hands as the chickens from his bad management come home to roost.
We need retail in this city -- for real people who
like to shop at Target and Wal-Mart, Kohls, etc. We have enough high end
stores without enough people with big bucks to keep them all afloat. If we
must have malls, they should not be so grand as to discourage people of moderate
income from spending their money there. If you have lived in Dallas for 30
years, you can remember suburban people complaining about their lack of places
to shop with all the good stores in Downtown Dallas or NorthPark. The
tables have turned.
Rather than tax abatements for unneeded office buildings or hotels or high-end
shopping malls, we should be out there recruiting mid-price retailers to locate
INSIDE our city limits -- not just near us in the Metroplex. We don't
share sales tax collected by Plano or Addison.
If we are going to avoid going bankrupt, we need to replace at least 9 council
members next May. Of course, Duh Walne and MPT Poss are gone no matter
what. Oakley is not likely to beat Housewright, even if he runs. If
the Courts don't remove T-Reese from the council, Duncan will beat her again
with all eyes watching. Then there's Dwaine Caraway who wants to challenge
T-Reese, too. In a Caraway/T-Reese race, I would have to go with Husband
Dwaine. Hopefully, Danny Harrison is going to challenge Lois
Finkelman. It would be physically dangerous for anyone to seriously
challenge Hill, Fantroy and Chaney's political machines. Elba Garcia
probably will not even draw an opponent, but Domingo might tell her to step
aside for him to take back the seat now that they have drawn Steve Salazar out
of their district.
Help is on
the way, but may not get here in time to keep us from going over the edge.
| |

|