|
Chip Northrup Neil Planick Larkin Toler Joe Wells
| |
02/25/02 Or
just sure the City Attorney is in league with the Sex Clubs?
If the City Attorney were a baseball team manager who continued to send in her
"C" team players against the Yankees with the expected disastrous
results, the team General Manager would be sending the manager
packing.
It's time for
Madeleine Johnson to go.
Randy Staff is not a mild mannered man who goes along to get along. He is
a hard hitting, hard talking business man who has spent a ton of money trying to
protect his bank from the effects of the sex clubs on Northwest Highway.
Until recently, he thought the City Attorney's office was losing cases against
the sex clubs because the Assistant City Attorneys were just outmatched and
out-resourced for hearings related to sex clubs in the Bachman-Northwest Highway
area. Now, Randy Staff is convinced there's a planned conspiracy at City
Hall to keep Bachman-Northwest Hwy. as the city's red light
district.
When I sued the city to try to stop the illegal tax abatement for the
Hicks/Perot arena area, my lawyer and I showed up for the Motion to Dismiss
hearing. City Atty. Johnson sent a team of 6 lawyers, including the Robber
Barons' Concierge, Ray Hutchinson (the Senator's husband) and 2 other Vinson
& Elkins lawyers. From Scared
in Dallas:
| The
SIX LAWYERS who defended the city against this common citizen may have
won today?s battle. They may not have won the war. They are
accustomed to dealing with people for whom money is everything.
There is some freedom in not being wealthy. Their threats to hit
me with their bloated attorney fees concern me, but they don?t scare
me.
Do you know what scares me? I'm scared
because Dallas citizens have no place to go for peaceful, legal redress
of their issues. We know we can?t go to City Hall -- they are
the ones doing us wrong. We apparently can't go to our district
courts for justice. |
When there's a chance a citizen might prevail against clearly illegal action by
the city council, CA Johnson send an army to defend the rights of robber barons
to divert Dallas taxpayers' money. To defend the rights of legitimate
Bachman-NW Hwy. businesses and residents against sex club owners, CA Johnson
sends in an outmatched and
out-resourced Asst. City Attorney who blew the case before the Permit
and License Appeal Board (PLA).
We will get back to the PLA hearing, but Linda Neel sent the following notice
regarding yet another Board of Adjustment hearing for Burch Management' Baby
Dolls and Fare West to have 19 YEARS TO AMORTIZE THEIR INVESTMENT in their
Bachman-NW Hwy location:
Feb
20, 2002 - Short version of long story . . .
As a result of the SOB Ordinance passed in May, 1997, the Fare
West and Baby Dolls were given amortization hearings by the Board of
Adjustment to determine how long they could continue to operate in order
to recover their investment costs.
That period came and went. Burch Management filed suit in Federal
Court, contesting the constitutionality of the City of Dallas Sexually
Oriented Business (SOB) Ordinance. Judge Jerry Buchmeyer ruled the
Ordinance is constitutional and gave them until November 2, 2000, to
come into compliance (relocate), but they could request an extension
if they could not recoup actual investment by that time. The Board
of Adjustment determined Fare West and Baby Dolls already had their
amortization hearings and did not give them additional time.
Burch Management appealed that decision. State Court Judge David
Evans (a Republican) reinterpreted Judge Buchmeyer's ruling, stating that additional Board of
Adjustment hearings were intended to be given. On 12/14/01, Judge
Buchmeyer clarified his Final Judgment, ordering the Board of Adjustment
to provide additional hearings for Baby Dolls and Fare West to determine
whether they are entitled to further amortization beyond Nov 2, 2000.
So, a new Board of Adjustment hearing has been scheduled for Fare West
on Feb 21, 2002, at 1:00 pm in Council Chambers. The Baby Dolls
hearing is scheduled for April 15, 2002.
Fare West has requested an additional nineteen (19) years to recover
investment costs. NINETEEN YEARS!!
We believe the City will show they have already more than recovered
investment costs incurred prior to the zoning change. Any
Investments after the zoning change should not be considered.
The success of our Bachman Plan for redevelopment / revitalization lies
in this decision. We cannot hope to attract new money or
business to this area as long as these clubs are located here.
The public is invited to attend these hearings. |
I scanned the DMN local stories for some report on this hearing, but could not
find a single reference. The community's war on Bachman-NW Hwy sex clubs
is so unimportant to Belo that they don't even mention it in their short-short
list. But then, Belo does believe in promoting businesses that SERVICE THE
TOURISTS -- what few we have left with the high-dollar tourist taxes we have in
this town. If a tourist is seeking prostitution (fake or otherwise) and
illegal drugs, any cab driver can drop him off at a Bachman-NW Hwy sex club and
he's sure to score.
Something else happened on Friday, 2/21/02. There was a hearing before the
city's Permit and License Appeal Board. An enraged Bachman warrior sent
this report:
| On
Friday, 2/21/02, Baby Dolls Topless Saloon had a hearing before a
3-member panel of the Permit and License Appeal Board (PLAB) requesting
they OVERTURN the Chief of Police?s denial of a Dance Hall license.
Panel members were Roland Anderson (Rasansky appointee), Joe Davis, Jr.
(Fantroy appointee) and Ralph Castro (Thornton-Reese appointee).
Castro served as panel chair.
Asst. City Atty. Jason Schuette
represented the City of Dallas and told the panel that Baby Dolls could
not be granted a Dance Hall (DH) license without first obtaining a
Specific Use Permit (SUP) because its location is zoned Community Retail
(CR) and dance halls are not permitted in CR zoning without an
SUP. Schuette also explained that on 2/7/02, Baby Dolls' SUP
application as DENIED WITH PREJUDICE by the City Planning and Zoning
Commission. Additionally, the Asst. City Atty. who advises the
PLAB told the panel members the only issue to be addressed was if the
Chief of Police had properly denied Baby Dolls? application for a
Dance Hall license. Since CR zoning requires a SUP and Baby Dolls does
not have a SUP, it was apparent the Chief of Police was required to deny
their Dance Hall application. Since the Chief of Police had
properly denied Baby Dolls? application for a Dance Hall license, the
only legal and reasonable decision was for the panel to uphold the Chief
of Police?s denial.
Unfortunately for the Bachman
Lake/Northwest Highway Neighborhood, Fantroy's appointee, Joe Davis,
Jr., and Thornton-Reese's appointee, Chairman Castro disregarded the law
and the facts and voted to OVERTURN the Chief of Police?s legally
mandated denial of Baby Dolls? Dance Hall application. Panel
member Anderson (appointed by Rasansky) pleaded with Davis and Castro to
comply with the law and follow the City Attorney?s advise to uphold
the Chief of Police?s denial but to no avail.
During the hearing Davis stated "They [Baby
Dolls] are trying to get their SUP, so I want to give them a
chance!"
Chairman Ralph Castro, an experienced PLAB member said, "This is
about getting a Dance Hall license, not about an SUP. They [Baby Dolls]
have been dancing for years so give ?em the license. This area is all
[illegally operating] clubs anyway."
This is not the first time PLAB
members have ignored the law and facts and approved a license for Baby
Dolls to operate in the Bachman Lake Neighborhood. In May, 2000,
Baby Dolls was granted a Sexually Oriented Business (SOB) license over
the objections of the neighborhood, the City Attorney?s office and the
Chief of Police. In that hearing, Chairman Denny Brown (appointed
by Walne) and another panel member (appointed by Miller) ignored the law
and the facts and OVERTURNED the Chief of Police?s denial of Baby
Dolls? application for a SOB license. A public outcry ensued and both
panel members quickly resigned. |
City
Atty asks Bachman-NW: Was it good for you?
If you have ever seen their shabby clubs from NW Hwy, you can just imagine how
many hours it would take to amortize their investment -- hours, not days, not
months, not years, but hours.
Another club on NW Hwy is operating a Dance Hall in the old Steak &
Ale building, La Guira. It is also in Community Retail (CR) zoning and
cannot qualify for a Dance Hall license or an SUP. According to one
Bachman-NW Hwy warrior:
.
. . repeated requests to Code Enforcement, Police, the City Attorney, as
well as the City Manager for over six months have not produced a return
telephone call or any action.
It is now reported that the La Guira (a non-conforming business) has
applied for an SUP.
The Dance Hall ordinance specifically states that if a business operates
as a Dance Hall without a Dance Hall license then a Dance Hall license
may not be granted until 1 year from the date the business ceases to
operate as a Dance Hall. Why is nothing being done ?
|
In early February, a Board of Adjustment member said the City Attorney
was modifying how the BoA works. Historically, if a citizen
filed an application to terminate a non-conforming use and set a
compliance date, the BoA had a hearing to (1) determine if the business
was nonconforming, (2) (if the business was determined to be
nonconforming) determine if the circumstances warrant required
compliance and (3) (if the circumstances warranted required compliance)
set an amortization period (compliance date).
Determining non-conformance was typically simple. If the business
had a CO and/or license for a business not permitted under existing
zoning or ordinance (locational restrictions), then the business was
found to be non-conforming, the non-conforming rights were terminated
and the non-conforming business was required to submit evidence (prove)
the amount of time required to recover its investment.
Typically, City staff handled everything. Once the business was
determined to be non-conforming, the business had the burden of
proof. This has changed. Now, if a citizen files an
application with the BoA, the burden of proof falls on the
citizen. When asked how a citizen would ever have access to the
business' records to determine (prove) the appropriate amortization
period, the City Attorney for the BoA stated that the citizen would have
"subpoena powers". However, if a City Council person or
a Board of Adjustment member filed the application, City staff would
handle everything and no fee would be required.
Citizens must pay
$1,200 to file an application.
So, in addition to $1,200, a citizen would be required to hire
accountants and lawyers to prosecute the applications.
The City Attorney has arranged to change the "burden of proof"
on citizen applications when she found out the Bachman group was getting
ready to file 8 applications (and pay the fees of $9,600) with the BoA
to terminate nonconforming uses (4 alcoholic beverage establishments, 3
billiard halls and 1 dance hall).
John Loza told us he would "get" the applications filed
without a fee, so we did not file the applications waiting for John
Loza. When John Loza did nothing, in early December 2001, when our
attorney
went to file one of the applications and pay the $1,200 fee on our
behalf. He was told that the rules had changed (while we waited
for John Loza to help).
Strangely enough, the business that we were going to file against was
Nick Rizzo's Stratos Bar & Grill, which has a nonconforming
Accessory Dance Hall license. |
You may remember Nick Rizzo from Old Al Lipscomb's problems. And they say
crime doesn't pay?
Tell that to Old Al while he sits in the new wing of his house, watching his BIG
SCREEN TV and holding court for supplicating politico's to seek his support for
their political efforts. Tell that to Nick Rizzo, a confessed briber of a
city councilman, who now has another business on NW Hwy after confessing to
bribing Old Al. Tell that to Chief of Police Terrell Bolton as he holds on
to his job despite his involvement with Old Al and Caligula Rizzo, despite
costing the city Millions over his demotions of several experienced Police
Commanders and despite letting almost 60 Mexican nationals rot in jail while he
UNSUCCESSFULLY covered his large hiney.
It's time for Chief
Bolton and City MisManager Ted Benavides to go. It's way past time for
City Attorney Johnson to go.
Just as importantly, it's time for Maxine Thornton-Reese to go. She is
holding her council seat despite a Court ruling there was rampant fraud in her
election. If she had any integrity, any shred of decency, she would have
stepped down and requested another election. She would not dare do that
because there would be too much scrutiny on how elections are done in District 4
-- Ground Zero for Mail-In Ballot Vote Fraud in Dallas. If she were not on
the council, her appointee to the License & Permit Board, Ralph Castro,
would not have been there to abuse the residents and legitimate businesses along
Bachman-NW Hwy. Using his logic:
| They
[Baby Dolls] have been dancing for years so give ?em the license. This
area is all clubs anyway. |
Apparently, Ralph Castro has the same mind set as people who find no problem
with illegal voting activities in South Dallas. State Rep. Terri Hodges
proudly said she has been running her mail-in ballot scam for 20 years.
Time doesn't make wrong doing right or legal. People have been running
drugs in areas for years, but we don't stop trying to end that illegal
activity. From time to time prostitutes land on Harry Hines Blvd. or other
streets to ply their trade, but we don't stop trying to end that illegal
activity. We finally got legislation in Austin to put their rears in a
jail cell for a third conviction.
It's a crying shame we continually have to turn to Austin for new laws to
control local problems that are so blatantly illegal most people are amazed to
find out they go on. The Mayor's husband is going to have a lot on his
plate in the next Legislative Session.
If I seem to be taking all this stuff up on Bachman-NW Hwy. a little too
personal, there's a reason. After 26 years of living on the same block
between Oak Lawn and Turtle Creek, I am buying a house in a lovely neighborhood
just South of Walnut Hill -- which makes it just North of the sex clubs.
This will no longer be an issue where I sympathize with the Bachman-NW Hwy
warriors. By necessity, I'm going to have to enlist in their
army.
Are you ready, Burch
Management?
Which sort of brings me back to the issue of who the City Attorney
represents? Until Dictator Con Jerk took the throne at City Hall, the City
Attorney seemed to represent Dallas citizens. There were many times I
disagreed with Sam Lindsley, but Madeleine Johnson's sole purpose as City
Attorney appears to be to enhance our memory of Sam's days as City
Attorney. Johnson is just awful. She is the most political City
Attorney that I can recall, and I have a long memory. Worse, she's not
very good at being political.
Why would Johnson send 3 Asst. City Attorneys, plus Ray Hutchinson and 2 of his
high dollar associates, to block my efforts to reverse the second tax abatement
the city (and the DISD) gave Hicks and Perot, but she sends a low level,
incompetent and unprepared Asst. City Attorney to oppose Baby Dolls' Dance Hall
permit? The answer is obvious.
The City
Attorney is in league with the Sex Clubs and she needs to go.
sb
| |

|