|
| |
12/15/03 Dude, where's my lake?
We voted for a lake and
boulevards, not a suspension bridge over a drainage
ditch and a tolllway. If the the boulevards are not must haves in the
bridge design, then the Trinity River Project is just
becomes an architectural folly and a major bypass - with no stimulus to
riverside development or recreation. A big long
range mistake.
It is very discouraging to see that the Council has
turned the focus of
the project primarily onto highways and bridges - and not the
interface with the river
itself. When faced with a challenge this big, it is
tempting for politicians to succumb to an edifice complex, which they
have in a big way.
For instance, while it is largely a knock-off of his
other projects, the proposed Calatrava bridge at Woodall Rogers is
the wrong solution in the wrong location. For
starters, it is an enormous suspension bridge - designed to span a wide deep
river like the Hudson, not
the Trinity, nor the roadway proposed on one side of
the flood plain.
That's what beam bridges or the proposed arch bridge at I-35 are
meant to do.
Once the river plan is turned into an expressway, the
opportunities for "enhancing" the river will become just so much
highway landscaping to be viewed at 70 miles an hour.
The natural environment of the river will be
compromised in the bargain. Also missing from the
approved plan is any real connection between the city
and the river - anything that would encourage development adjacent to
the river along the levees.
The boulevards along the levees that initially sold me
on the project are gone. If the bridges
are built without
anticipating interchanges for such boulevards, they will stay
gone, and with them any realistic hopes for
offices, retail and residences fronting the river.
Look at it this way - what if Central Expressway had
been built inside the Turtle Creek flood plain. If
Garland Road and Buckner had been built immediately
adjacent to White Rock Lake.
Get the picture ? For the sake of a pretty bridge and
a new highway, we
will have given up on the river for nature, for
recreation and development.
A neat trick on us all.
| |

|