|
Citizen D Officer Dan Kirk & Miller
| |
10/27/03 Hell Has Not Frozen
Over, but . . .
This is not a good time to replace Ted Benavides as City Manager. Instead,
we should be suing Ron Kirk, John Ware, Tom Hicks and Ross Perot, Jr. for all of
our problems.
Like you, I read McCain Nelson's DMN story:
 |
For Benavides, job gets
tougher
09:33 PM CDT on
Saturday, October 25, 2003
By COLLEEN McCAIN NELSON / The Dallas Morning
News |
. . . Mr. Benavides took the job of Dallas city
manager five years ago.
After a two-year stint managing the
city of Denton, he returned to Dallas to work for a mayor ? Ron Kirk ? he
considered a friend and a council that had wooed him. Times were good then ?
the economy was booming, city coffers were flush, and revenues were on the
upswing. The city manager's charge: Maintain the momentum.
In the early going, council members
embraced his low-key approach, describing his first evaluations as "love
fests."
In many ways, that was a lifetime
ago.
Today, the man who balances a nearly
$2 billion budget and manages 13,000 employees finds himself in a different
place.
Revenues have plummeted, and
maintaining even the most basic services is a struggle. Nerves are rubbed
raw in the wake of the firing of the city's first black police chief. And
the mayor who never wanted Mr. Benavides hired ? Ms. Miller ? wants to
replace him.
Throughout this roller coaster ride,
the city's de facto CEO has remained behind the scenes, methodically
tackling problems in ways that have won over his supporters and frustrated
his detractors.
Depending on whom you ask, Mr.
Benavides is either impeding progress or just hitting his stride.
. . . |
Ted Benavides was never qualified to be the City Manager of Dallas. That's
why Ron Kirk picked him. Ted's job was to take the blame for all the screw
ups and messes left behind by John Ware and Ron Kirk. Many current
department heads are holdovers from John Ware.
Other than Yolanda Lara, the one city employee who should be fired tomorrow is
Asst. City Mgr. Charles Daniels, the guy who has cost us so much. He has
some Svengali power over Benavides. The biggest mistake Benavides has made
as City Manager was naming Terrell Bolton to be Chief of Police, without even
interviewing him. Charles Daniels recommended Bolton.
When all the stuff started flying around about Bolton's connection to Rizos
bribing Al Lipscomb for non-enforcement in NW Hwy sex clubs, the City Manager
called one of his "rare press conferences" and announced he had investigated the
matter and determined that Bolton was not involved. When asked about the
scope of his investigation, he said Bolton told him he wasn't involved.
That was good enough for him.
That day -- Benavides should have been fired as City Manager, but Ron Kirk was
Mayor and needed Ted covering his rear.
We now have a CONFESSED & CONVICTED BRIBE TAKER on the Police Review Board --
thanks in part to the failure of Benavides to do a full investigation of the
Bolton/Lipscomb/Rizos matter. Of course, Old Al serving on the PRB is a
direct result of two Housewives Extraordinare selling out to build a base for
their own Mission Impossible races for Mayor.
We are in dire straits these days at City Hall, end products of the bad old days
of John Ware and Ron Kirk. Jim Schutze has it right in his Sticker
Shock in the
Dallas Observer. The
bad guys are out there raking in all sorts of $$ for their assistance to the
Robber Barons, and Ted Benavides is presiding over a sinking ship.
Contrary to McCain Nelson's position that we had plenty of revenue when Ted
Benavides first became City Manager, we had a smoke and mirrors budget that did
not jive with reality. Only Donna Blumer and Laura Miller ever questioned
anything, and the rest of the council just went along to get along with Ron
Kirk. John Loza blocked Donna Blumer's efforts to find out the truth about
who did what to the Bachman community with the Lipscomb/Rizos bribe. When
testimony in Old Al's federal trial revealed more details and two DPD employees
(a Lieutenant and a civilian) absolutely identified Bolton as Lipscomb's
accomplice, Miller finally woke up and started asking questions, too. She
got severely punished for asking questions.
Bolton should have been fired on the spot for what happened at Miller's home on
his behalf, but he was not. Another reason to have fired Ted Benavides
years ago!
Still, it was not Benavides who covered for Bolton. It was Charles
Daniels, and he is still an Assistant City Manager after all of his disasters.
Daniels must have some embarrassing pictures of Ted Benavides.
That's a joke -- the idea of Ted Benavides doing something risqu?is too far
fetched for that to be a factor.
I have no idea what Daniels has over Benavides, but the way Benavides has
ignored the fake drug scandal and the wrong done those Mexican Nationals is very
telling. Here we are with the FIRST HISPANIC CITY MANAGER, and one of the
most horrible episodes of injustice to an Hispanic in our city occurred under
his watch.
R. Lopez:
What would it take for the DMN to
do a human interest story on the lives of the drug scandal victims?
It would let them know they are not forgotten.
People need to know just how their lives and
their children's lives have forever been impacted
by their false arrests and jail
time. They not only lost what they
had worked so hard to acquire for their families,
but they were deprived of liberty and justice. |
Back in the 70's, a stupidly arrogant police officer tried to scare a 12
year old Hispanic boy into confessing to a burglary by cocking his gun near the
kid's head -- the gun went off. The city went off! We had a real
riot Downtown. It was terrifying! Still, it was a stupid accident --
a split second, stupid accident.
Here we are 30 years later when a long-term scheme of falsely implicating,
arresting and imprisoning Mexican Nationals was all conducted without the
knowledge of the Chief of Police or his commanders. Sure, nobody was
involved except for those two rogue Vice officers.
Not only did our FIRST HISPANIC CITY MANAGER say little and do less, but where
were the so-called Hispanic Leaders in this town? Particularly the elected
officials? State Rep Roberto Alonzo? Councilwoman Elba Garcia?
Mayor Pro Tem John Loza? Councilman Steve Salazar? DISD Trustee Joe
Thug May? DISD Trustee Rafael Anchia? Adelfa Callejo (who thinks she was
elected to something)? Former State Rep. and former City Councilman
Domingo Garcia?
DallasArena.com is a big fan of Jesse Diaz. Even if he crosses the line
occasionally, the guy DOES SOMETHING. He has publicly
stated their regret for not being more vocal when the fake drug scandal broke.
Diana Flores of
People United for Representation
and Equality (PURE)
was out there screaming against this atrocity from the get go, but. there was a conspiracy
among most "so-called" Hispanic leaders (particularly the elected officials) to stay quiet so as not to shake
up the Black/Brown alliance (as if there ever was one).
One Hispanic citizen (who needs to remain anonymous) had these comments:
|
To date, Diana Flores of
PURE, Jesse Diaz of Dallas LULAC Council 4496 and a few
other Hispanic leaders have met with Dallas County District Atty.
Bill Hill, Guadalupe Gonzalez (FBI Spec.
Agent In Charge) and City
Mgr. Ted Benavides to address the Dallas Police Department's Fake
Drug Issue. Meetings are tentatively set
with Interim DPD Chief Hampton and Dallas Mayor
Laura Miller. |
With the exception of Mayor Miller, I don't see anyone in
Dallas City Hall who is ready to call for an Independent Internal
Investigation into this matter. In fact,
our City Manager nearly choked when it was strongly suggested by those who
met with him that any Internal Investigation into this matter be conducted
by persons who have an established record of public integrity and be
outside of Dallas City Hall. It appears City
Manager Benavides is worried about how DPD rank
and file would accept this kind of investigation. See
what I mean, folks?
We need people who are
Looking Out For You! That
should be our Mantra from this point forward.
Is anyone
on the Dallas City Council willing to join the Dallas Morning News, Mayor
Miller, PURE, Dallas LULAC Council 4496 and others from within our local
leadership ranks to call for an Independent Internal Investigation
into Dallas' Fake Drug Scandal that has ruined many lives of innocent
people and will cost the citizen-taxpayers of the City of Dallas Millions
of our hard earned Tax Dollars?
Don't trip over yourselves
doing it! We've already seen that happen on the recent
"Wetback" comment.
What about all those recall efforts
to oust Mayor Miller? All those recall
initiatives are almost as comical and sincere as
the Mass apologies on the "Wetback" comment.
|
Ted Benavides has finally done something right after 5 years. This is not
the time to fire him. This council is as responsible for the mess at City
Hall as is Ted Benavides. On more than one occasion, Mitch Rasansky
has told the council publicly and privately about flaws in contracts, leases and
other arrangements before them, all costing Dallas taxpayers millions.
They go right ahead and vote for those one-way arrangements, but no one cares.
There is so much micro-managing of City Hall matters by almost everyone on the
council that it's hard to blame anything on Ted Benavides. Even last year,
the council overrode his recommendation to terminate two high level DPD public
relation positions to save money.
Now, rather than allow the City Manager to do his job and hire a new Police
Chief, we are going to have a series of "community meetings" to hear from citizens
about what we want. Is that the craziest thing you have ever heard out of
City Hall yet?
We want a Police Chief with experience fighting crime -- not on the milk and
cookies circuit of crime watch meetings. Here's a list of the meetings:
| 10/28 7-8:30 pm |
City Hall, L1FN |
|
 |
| 10/29 7-8:30 pm |
Kiest Rec
Ctr |
3080 S Hampton |
| 10/30 7-8:30 pm |
Grauwyler Rec
Ctr |
7780 Harry Hines |
| 11/04 7-8:30 pm |
Tommie Allen Rec
Ctr |
7071 Bonnie View |
| 11/11 7:30-9 pm |
Campbell Green Rec
Ctr |
16600 Park Hill @ Campbell |
| 11/13 7-8:30 pm |
Samuell-Grand Rec
Ctr |
6200 East Grand |
| 11/18 7-8:30 pm |
Pleasant Oaks Rec
Ctr |
8701 Greenmound |
These meetings are the very thing that would have come out of The Dallas Plan.
Organize a meeting, drag people out to the meeting and let them think someone is
paying attention. They are more of the 70's stuff where City Hall deals
with issues by having meetings -- wear out the activists -- and do what the ODB
intended to be done in the first place.
If you attend these meetings, you are wasting your time and staff's time and our
money. If you don't go, City Hall will say you didn't care and disregard
your concerns, but no more than if you attended.
There's no meeting in Oak Lawn. The closest meeting to NW Dallas is down
at Grauwyler, which is way South of NW Highway. Looks like a pretty
stacked deck of meeting places.
It doesn't matter where the meetings are held. Holding these meetings in
the first place is
inappropriate. Recruiting, hiring or firing the Chief of Police is
absolutely the prerogative of the City Manager. It is not a group effort
-- not even a council effort -- until someone revises the City Charter.
The whole bunch at City Hall should be sued and/or arrested for violating the
City Charter. If this was the City Manager's idea, he should be fired --
but not right now.
Even if some people actually show up at these meetings, most attendees will be a handful of regulars who will scream
the Chief must be of one ethnic group or another. The attendees will not
be representative of the citizens of Dallas.
We have serious crime issues. If City Hall is going to hold meetings like
this, it should be to hear from citizens about what we want FROM OUR POLICE
DEPARTMENT, not who or what we want to be the Chief of Police. Give us a
chance to suggest what we think could be done to reduce crime in this
city. There are several immediate things that could be done. My
neighbor (and former campaign opponent) Linus Spiller had a great Viewpoint in
Sunday's DMN.
Linus Spiller: Police Department needs to get back to the basics.
Saturday morning, Molly Teague called me about her being mobbed on Greenville
Ave. No one at the DMN was interested. She said "unless there's an
actual murder, no one at the Morning
News is interested".
www.BarkingDogs.org has a story about,
but here's the e-mail she sent to DallasArena.com about the mugging:
Molly Teague:
Re: Mugging on Greenville Ave, Friday night at 9:15 pm-
I want to warn your readers. I was
leaving the Barney Stone at approximately 9:15 pm, Friday
evening. My friend, Jodie Cunningham, and I
were walking around the back to the parking lot
where we had parked the car.
We were almost to our car when 2 black males
(approx. 25-28 years
old) came up to us, put
a gun to our heads and threatened to shoot us. |
www.BarkingDogs.org says one of the
women was thrown to the ground, which may have re-injured a recently healed
broken arm.
Molly probably has several things she would like to say about crime prevention,
but what does she know about who should be the Chief of Police?
Tim Dickey wants to reduce liquor sales in non-conforming locations -- like a
gas station on Webb Chapel. Spacing restrictions between stores where
liquor can be sold would certainly help much of our problems. Reducing the
number of liquor stores would be a crime-reducing measure.
I want the Chief of Police use our nuisance laws to close down and
demolish several problem apartment complexes where there have been a history of
crime and violence. That would send a strong message to other apartment
owners that they also could lose the use of their property if they don't control
their premises and their residents. Two of the highest crime areas in the
city -- Northeast Dallas and Northwest Dallas -- have high concentrations of
apartments. Huge 2-story and 3-story complexes with hundreds of units,
which are occupied by way more people than the buildings were intended to house.
This would be a crime-reducing measure and would have immediate results.
Many apartment managers must
follow orders from their bosses (the property owners) to get as much rent as possible
with as little expense as possible. If the managers could show the owners
what the city has done with other problem properties, that would help them, too.
We cannot ignore the direct connection between alcohol and crime and
over-populated apartment complexes and crime. The public and the DPD
officials are in agreement on these two issues.
Another area where citizens and DPD officers agree are the negative impact of
late night dance hall permits. I have come full circle on this issue.
I went from opposing them to seeing late night dance permits as a way to let
people sober up before hundreds of partying club hoppers headed back to their
cars at the same hour. It is clear that problems from late night dance
halls exceed the benefits. It was interesting that the council would turn
this down. More so, that Sandy Greyson would see ending late night dance
halls as anti-convention business. How many of these late night clubs
would she tolerate in her district or near her home? Denying late night
permits to problem night clubs would be a crime-reducing measure. Pulling
a late night permit from any club where there's an assault or murder on property
they control (club or parking lot), would be a HUGE crime-reducing measure.
Tim Dickey had these comments on the subject:
Tim Dickey:
Re: This brouhaha about ending Late Night Permits.
All they have to do is change the existing
ordinance to allow a permit to be denied on the basis of a history of
trouble at a location. Under the current ordinance, the only basis for
denial by the PLAB (Permit & License Board) is
that the club violates a LOCATIONAL restriction.
Chief Martinez
once said at Grauwyler Rec. Center
(week after an officer was killed at 3:20
am at a rogue nightclub
off NW Hwy.), "a club
can have a history of murders in the parking lot, and as long as they don't
violate the locational restrictions, the city still has to give them the
permit."
Laura Miller was in the audience that
night and heard that. Gary Turner was sitting next to me, and heard it, too.
So, why aren't they simply making the existing ordinance
stronger, instead of trying to ban all clubs and causing all this ruckus?
Sureley no
one would object to a case-by-case Late Night Permit process, based on a
club's history, instead of the current "everybody gets one" situation.
The DMN talked about how 11 out of 13
of the DPD "no permit" recommendations were overturned by the PLAB.
I'm almost positive that's because the City
Attorney advises the PLAB of the "locational only"
limitation and says they MUST
grant the permit. |
This is what we need to address in these 7 "community meetings" -- what we want the
Chief of Police to do -- not who we want him or her to be.
We are looking for a new Chief of Police because Ted Benavides finally did his
job. Of course, he had to finally do his job because he appointed a
blithering idiot (who turned out to be a whacked out psycho) to the job in the
first place. That was then.
Now, we need the City Manager to do his job and stand up to this council.
He has a responsibility -- and so does the council -- to defend our City Charter
and our City Manager form of government. As the FIRST HISPANIC CITY
MANAGER, he should demand the same respect as was shown John Ware. Council
would not have dared tell John Ware he had to hold 7 faux "community meetings" regarding
one his direct appointments.
In McCain Nelson's article, she states:
Dallas is one of the largest cities in the country with a
council-manager government. Ms. Miller, who has lobbied unsuccessfully to
change the power structure, said the current system leaves taxpayers unsure
whom to hold responsible.
"I am trying to do all the things
that the public expects me to do, and they would be astonished to know what
little authority I have to do what they want me to do," the mayor said.
|
The Mayor has taken on some causes she never addressed in her campaigns and
neglects other issues that were to be her agenda. We still want green
parks and smooth streets, and we don't want all of them to be Downtown.
One reason people like Mayor Miller is her freshness. Before she ran for
council, she was not part of the "groomed for success" crowd pushed by Our
Downtown Betters (the ODB). I doubt she was active in her neighborhood
association. As a journalist, she knew how City Hall worked on a technical
basis, but she has never understood the political nuances of the place.
Ted Benavides has not been assertive when he should have been. Ted
Benavides has put some inept people in the wrong jobs. That said, much of
the problems at City Hall were caused by decisions made by or under John Ware
and Ron Kirk.
The Mayor needs to quit believing she can trust Don Hill. Ted Benavides
needs to get rid of Charles Daniels.
 |
We need to find out who came up with the idea for these ridiculous
faux "community meetings" about a new Police Chief and how much it's costing us and what services
we are not getting to cover the expense.
|
| |

|