Sharon Boyd, Editor/Publisher

          DallasArena.com
Your alternative to
The Dallas Managed News  
            
Rad Field

  Home       Search     

               

BadDealLogo.gif (6018 bytes)


 


                             

http://www.window.state.tx.us/taxinfo/proptax/tc02/ch26b.htm#26.05
To:  Dallas City Council      2-6-2003 Tax Rate Rollback Petition
SUBJECT:  The 2003 Bond Issue-- Magnitude

Reference:  Press Coverage --  Wednesday / Thursday 2/5-2/6/2003

Hello Council Members:

  I have to hand it to the Council.  You've done it.  You've confused me.  There are going to be several iterations of the proposed bond package offered to the citizens of Dallas.  

Also, the City Manager's  Office is unable to calculate the impact on tax rates, due to complexities.  But-- in the Town Hall Meetings, it was offered up that it was looking like a mere cost of $35 per $100,000 piece of residential property.  I'm not sure if the $35 is per year, or for the bond period, or during the later two years of maturity.  

Now, on Thursday morning, I have been provided the real answer to the question.  On KRLD, Councilwoman Lill has told us that the tax increase will only amount to the cost of a glass of tea at a nice food establishment.  That might be a glass of tea on one occasion or one glass per day for five years--- who really knows?  Anyway, it's really not important in that the Mayor Pro Tem decided to leave the meeting prior to completion.

  The citizens of Dallas deserve better than statements provided above.  No wonder citizens want a larger bond package when they believe it will not cost more than a glass of tea, or possibly $35 distributed over five years.  

To compound the confusion, the City Manager's Office was not prepared to offer up an approximate tax rate increase at the bond meeting Wednesday.  I tend to agree with those on the Council that believe the City Manager has served his time, and it's it's now time to go.  How could a manager, given the time to prepare, be unprepared for an issue that means so much to the citizens of Dallas?

  Now you all know why I might be confused as to what my new tax rate might be.  I did not hear anyone mention the Operating Budget shortfall, nor what that tax rate increase might be (if any).  Any additional tax rate increase for the Operating Budget will perhaps be left as a surprise, or it might only amount to one additional glass of tea.  No wonder the taxpayers are confused (or just don't realize what is going on).  

The fact that revenue from the old Palladium project will be delayed, and that the naming rights for the Arena may be up in the air  will perhaps compound the total property tax issue.   It might get so bad that the citizens of Dallas may have to pay for a name to go on the Arena.  Perhaps it could be named "Dallas Arena".  

It is beginning to appear that the representatives from the Miller, Crescent, Crow companies (and many more) really knew what they were talking about during the earlier Palladium TIF hearings.  It will truly get interesting, as the vote nears, if an organized group opposed to a tax rate increase materializes and causes a bond issue defeat.  Remember the "2012 Olympic Bid" and subsequent overwhelming vote by the citizens?

Regards,

Rad Field, District 11

 

 

 

Sec. 26.05. Tax Rate.

          (a) The governing body of each taxing unit, before the later of September 30 or the 60th day after the date the
          certified appraisal roll is received by the taxing unit, shall adopt a tax rate for the current tax year and shall notify 
          the assessor for the unit of the rate adopted. The tax rate consists of two components, each of which must be           approved separately. The components are:

               (1) the rate that, if applied to the total taxable value, will impose the total amount published under Section
               26.04(e)(3)(C), less any amount of additional sales and use tax revenue that will be used to pay debt
               service; and

               (2) the rate that, if applied to the total taxable value, will impose the amount of taxes needed to fund
               maintenance and operation expenditures of the unit for the next year.

          (b) A taxing unit may not impose property taxes in any year until the governing body has adopted a tax rate for
          that year, and the annual tax rate must be set by ordinance, resolution, or order, depending on the method
          prescribed by law for adoption of a law by the governing body. The vote on the ordinance, resolution, or order
          setting the tax rate must be separate from the vote adopting the budget.

          (c) If the governing body of a taxing unit does not adopt a tax rate before the date required by Subsection (a), the
          tax rate for the taxing unit for that tax year is the lower of the effective tax rate calculated for that tax year or the
          tax rate adopted by the taxing unit for the preceding tax year. A tax rate established by this subsection is treated
          as an adopted tax rate. Before the fifth day after the establishment of a tax rate by this subsection, the governing
          body of the taxing unit must ratify the applicable tax rate in the manner required by Subsection (b).

          (d) The governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district may not adopt a tax rate that exceeds the
          lower of the rollback tax rate or 103 percent of the effective tax rate calculated as provided by this chapter until
          the governing body has held a public hearing on the proposed tax rate and has otherwise complied with Section
          26.06 and Section 26.065. The governing body of a taxing unit shall reduce a tax rate set by law or by vote of
          the electorate to the lower of the rollback tax rate or 103 percent of the effective tax rate and may not adopt a
          higher rate unless it first complies with Section 26.06.

          (e) A person who owns taxable property is entitled to an injunction restraining the collection of taxes by a taxing
          unit in which the property is taxable if the taxing unit has not complied with the requirements of this section and
          the failure to comply was not in good faith. An action to enjoin the collection of taxes must be filed prior to the
          date a taxing unit delivers substantially all of its tax bills.

          (f) Except as required by the law under which an obligation was created, the governing body may not apply any
          tax revenues generated by the rate described in Subsection (a)(1) of this section for any purpose other than the
          retirement of debt.

          Amended by 1981 Tex. Laws (1st C.S.), p. 164, ch. 13, Sec. 117; amended by 1985 Tex. Laws, p. 4994, ch. 657, Sec. 3; amended by 1987
          Tex. Laws, ch. 699, Sec. 2, ch. 947, Sec. 7, and ch. 988, Sec. 2; amended by 1991 Tex. Laws, p. 1522, ch. 404, Sec. 1; amended by 1997
          Tex. Laws, p. 560, ch. 165, Sec. 29.06 and p. 3910, ch. 1039, Sec. 27; amended by 1999 Tex. Laws, p. 2511, ch. 398, Sec. 3; amended by
          1999 Tex. Laws, p. 2759, ch. 423, Sec. 1; amended by 1999 Tex. Laws, p. 4596, ch. 1358, Sec. 2.

          Cross References:

          Notice, hearing, and vote on tax increase, see Sec. 26.06.
          Comptroller model notice of public hearing, see Rule Sec. 9.17.
          Calculation of effective and rollback tax rates, see Sec. 26.04.
          Delivery of tax bills, see Sec. 31.01.
          School district budget and proposed tax rate notice, see Section 44.004, Education Code.

          Notes:

          SB 1420, 70th Leg., 1987, effective June 19, 1987, amends subsection (e) and uses the term "payment" of debt. HB 1866, 70th Leg.,
          1987, effective January 1, 1988, uses the term "retirement" of debt.

          Where a municipal school district annexes territory that belonged to another school district, there is no need for the district to hold an
          election authorizing taxation within the newly annexed territory. Article VII, Sec. 3-b, Tex. Const., was added to eliminate the need for
          new voter approval of taxes when authorized changes are made to the boundaries of school districts. Once taxation has been authorized, a
          change in boundaries has no effect upon the power to tax. Manges v. Freer Independent School District, 677 S.W.2d 490 (Tex. 1984).

          The enriched education that a local school district desired to provide students was not the measure for determining if the state was
          imposing an educational mandate requiring the levy of a state-imposed rate of tax. The controlling factor in reviewing a challenge to an
          alleged state ad valorem tax is the State's involvement in the levy. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District, et. al v.
          Alanis, et al, No. 03-01-00491-CV (Tex. App.- Austin 2002).

          A taxing unit must specifically mention tax rate adoption in its open meetings notice; failure to do so can be raised as a defense in a
          delinquent tax lawsuit. Parr v. State, 743 S.W.2d 268 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1987, writ denied).

          After adopting a tax rate higher than the rollback rate under Tax Code Section 26.05, a community college district may not voluntarily
          reduce its adopted tax rate in the same tax year, The only method by which the Tax Code authorizes a community college district to
          reduce a tax rate that exceeds the rollback rate is an election timely initiated by a valid voter petition. While it may be reasonable as a
          matter of policy for a taxing unit to consider reducing its tax rate voluntarily, there is no statutory framework for "unwinding" the
          complex and detailed tax assessment and collection procedures. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JC-360 (2001).

          A hospital district governed by Health and Safety Code Chapter 286 may not hold an election to increase the maximum tax rate that the
          voters approved in an election to convert from a Chapter 282 hospital district. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JC-247 (2000).

          A county hospital district could legally levy and collect taxes to provide medical services to its indigent citizens, even if it closed its
          hospital and leased its facilities to a private entity to continue to provide the medical services. The hospital closure did not relieve the
          district of its obligations to provide medical services to its indigents. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JC-220 (2000).

          A county may not borrow money from the State Infrastructure Bank for road and bridge construction and repay the loan with property
          taxes levied for that purpose over a term of years without issuing bonds or other obligations evidencing the loan. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No.
          JC-0139 (1999).

          Section 26.05(d) - requiring public notice and hearing of intended property tax increases by political subdivisions - is constitutional. Article
          VIII, Section 21, is a limitation on the Texas Legislature's full power to levy and to authorize the levy of property taxes as well as a
          limitation on the taxing authority of political subdivisions. While the Constitution limits the Legislature's power, it does not prohibit the
          Legislature from enacting laws that provide additional limitations on the power to tax. Tax Code Section 26.05(d) limits local taxation
          power and requires public notices and a public hearing by a political subdivision regardless of whether the increase includes new
          improvements or new territory. The Tax Code section requires public notices and hearings in more cases than the Constitution would. Op.
          Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JC-0009 (1999).

          In the absence of any protest from taxpayers, taxpayers are deemed to have voluntarily paid a maintenance and operations school tax rate
          above the rate set by the electorate and are not entitled to a refund. A mistake in law does not excuse a taxpayer from the consequences of
          voluntary payment of taxes. Unless taxpayers protest under Section 31.115, that is payment of tax under protest, taxpayers are presumed
          to have paid the taxes voluntarily. Letter Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. DM-98-050 (1998).

          The county commissioners court must hold its meetings in the county courthouse as required by Sec. 81.005(c), Local Government Code.
          Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-871 (1988).

          Rollback elections are constitutional for hospital districts because the constitution confers the authority to provide for hospital district
          taxation on the legislature and not directly on the hospital district; Sec. 26.07 does not unconstitutionally suspend Sec. 26.05, which
          authorizes the setting of a tax rate. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-859 (1988).

          School tax rate rollback elections are constitutional because the constitution gives the legislature the authority to pass laws for the
          assessment and collection of property taxes for school districts; the legislature may delegate to voters the authority to place a one-year
          limitation on the tax rate adopted. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-835 (1987).

     Sec. 26.051. Evidence of Unrecorded Tax Rate Adoption.

          (a) If a taxing unit does not make a proper record of the adoption of a tax rate for a year but the tax rate can be
          determined by examining the tax rolls for that year, the governing body of the taxing unit may take testimony or
          make other inquiry to determine whether a tax rate was properly adopted for that year. If the governing body
          determines that a tax rate was properly adopted, it may order that its official records for that year be amended
          nunc pro tunc to reflect the adoption of the rate.

          (b) An amendment of the official records made under Subsection (a) of this section is prima facie evidence that
          the tax rate entered into the records was properly and regularly adopted for that year.

          Added by 1989 Tex. Laws, p. 181, ch. 2, Sec. 14.01.

     Sec. 26.052. Simplified Tax Rate Notice for Taxing Units with Low Tax Levies.

          (a) This section applies only to a taxing unit for which the total tax rate proposed for the current tax year:

               (1) is 50 cents or less per $100 of taxable value; and

               (2) would impose taxes of $500,000 or less when applied to the current total value for the taxing unit.

          (b) A taxing unit to which this section applies is exempt from the notice and publication requirements of Section
          26.04(e) and is not subject to an injunction under Section 26.04(g) for failure to comply with those requirements.

          (c) A taxing unit to which this section applies may provide public notice of its proposed tax rate in either of the
          following methods not later than the seventh day before the date on which the tax rate is adopted:

               (1) mailing a notice of the proposed tax rate to each owner of taxable property in the taxing unit; or

               (2) publishing notice of the proposed tax rate in the legal notices section of a newspaper having general
               circulation in the taxing unit.

          (d) A taxing unit that provides public notice of a proposed tax rate under Subsection (c) is exempt from Sections
          26.05(d) and 26.06 and is not subject to an injunction under Section 26.05(e) for failure to comply with Section
          26.05(d). A taxing unit that provides public notice of a proposed tax rate under Subsection (c) may not adopt a
          tax rate that exceeds the rate set out in the notice unless the taxing unit provides additional public notice under
          Subsection (c) of the higher rate or complies with Sections 26.05(d) and 26.06, as applicable, in adopting the
          higher rate.

          (e) Public notice provided under Subsection (c) must specify:

               (1) the tax rate that the governing body proposes to adopt;

               (2) the date, time, and location of the meeting of the governing body of the taxing unit at which the
               governing body will consider adopting the proposed tax rate; and

               (3) if the proposed tax rate for the taxing unit exceeds the unit's effective tax rate calculated as provided
               by Section 26.04, a statement substantially identical to the following: "The proposed tax rate would
               increase total taxes in (name of taxing unit) by (percentage by which the proposed tax rate exceeds the
               effective tax rate)."

          Added by 1993 Tex. Laws, p. 168, ch. 81, Sec. 1; repealed by 1997 Tex. Laws, p. 3918, ch. 1039, Sec. 28; added by 1999 Tex. Laws, p.
          1114, ch. 255, Sec. 1.

          Cross References:

          Public hearing requirement, see art. VIII, Sec. 21, Tex. Const.
          Failure to comply, see Sec. 26.05.
          Regular notice and publication requirements, see Sec. 26.04.
          Regular public hearing and notice requirements, see Sec. 26.06.

     Sec. 26.06. Notice, Hearing, and Vote on Tax Increase.

          (a) A public hearing required by Section 26.05 may not be held before the seventh day after the date the notice of
          the public hearing on the proposed tax increase is given. The hearing must be on a weekday that is not a public
          holiday. The hearing must be held inside the boundaries of the unit in a publicly owned building or, if a suitable
          publicly owned building is not available, in a suitable building to which the public normally has access. At the
          hearing, the governing body must afford adequate opportunity for proponents and opponents of the tax increase
          to present their views.

          (b) The notice of a public hearing may not be smaller than one-quarter page of a standard-size or a tabloid-size
          newspaper, and the headline on the notice must be in 18-point or larger type. The notice must:

               (1) contain a statement in the following form:

               "NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON TAX INCREASE

               "The (name of the taxing unit) will hold a public hearing on a proposal to increase total tax revenues from
               properties on the tax roll in the preceding year by (percentage by which proposed tax rate exceeds lower
               of rollback tax rate or effective tax rate calculated under this chapter) percent. Your individual taxes may
               increase at a greater or lesser rate, or even decrease, depending on the change in the taxable value of your
               property in relation to the change in taxable value of all other property and the tax rate that is adopted.

               "The public hearing will be held on (date and time) at (meeting place).

               "(Names of all members of the governing body, showing how each voted on the proposal to consider the
               tax increase or, if one or more were absent, indicating the absences.)"; and

               (2) contain the following information:

                    (A) the unit's adopted tax rate for the preceding year and the proposed tax rate, expressed as an
                    amount per $100;

                    (B) the difference, expressed as an amount per $100 and as a percent increase or decrease, as
                    applicable, in the proposed tax rate compared to the adopted tax rate for the preceding year;

                    (C) the average appraised value of a residence homestead in the taxing unit in the preceding year
                    and in the current year; the unit's homestead exemption, other than an exemption available only to
                    disabled persons or persons 65 years of age or older, applicable to that appraised value in each of
                    those years; and the average taxable value of a residence homestead in the unit in each of those
                    years, disregarding any homestead exemption available only to disabled persons or persons 65
                    years of age or older;

                    (D) the amount of tax that would have been imposed by the unit in the preceding year on a
                    residence homestead appraised at the average appraised value of a residence homestead in that
                    year, disregarding any homestead exemption available only to disabled persons or persons 65 years
                    of age or older;

                    (E) the amount of tax that would be imposed by the unit in the current year on a residence
                    homestead appraised at the average appraised value of a residence homestead in the current year,
                    disregarding any homestead exemption available only to disabled persons or persons 65 years of
                    age or older, if the proposed tax rate is adopted; and

                    (F) the difference between the amounts of tax calculated under Paragraphs (D) and (E), expressed
                    in dollars and cents and described as the annual increase or decrease, as applicable, in the tax to be
                    imposed by the unit on the average residence homestead in the unit in the current year if the
                    proposed tax rate is adopted
          .

          (c) The notice may be delivered by mail to each property owner in the unit, or it may be published in a
          newspaper. If the notice is published in a newspaper, it may not be in the part of the paper in which legal notices
          and classified advertisements appear.

          (d) At the public hearing the governing body shall announce the date, time, and place of the meeting at which it
          will vote on the proposed tax rate. After the hearing the governing body shall give notice of the meeting at which
          it will vote on the proposed tax rate and the notice shall be in the same form as prescribed by Subsections (b) and
          (c), except that it must state the following:

          "NOTICE OF VOTE ON TAX RATE

          "The (name of the taxing unit) conducted a public hearing on a proposal to increase the total tax revenues of the
          (name of the taxing unit) from properties on the tax roll in the preceding year by (percentage by which proposed
          tax rate exceeds lower of rollback tax rate or effective tax rate calculated under this chapter) percent on (date
          and time public hearing was conducted).

          "The (governing body of the taxing unit) is scheduled to vote on the tax rate that will result in that tax increase at
          a public meeting to be held on (date and time) at (meeting place)."

          (e) The meeting to vote on the tax increase may not be earlier than the third day or later than the 14th day after
          the date of the public hearing. The meeting must be held inside the boundaries of the taxing unit in a publicly
          owned building or, if a suitable publicly owned building is not available, in a suitable building to which the public
          normally has access. If the governing body does not adopt a tax rate that exceeds the lower of the rollback tax
          rate or 103 percent of the effective tax rate by the 14th day, it must give a new notice under Subsection (d)
          before it may adopt a rate that exceeds the lower of the rollback tax rate or 103 percent of the effective tax rate.

          (f) The comptroller by rule shall prescribe the language and format to be used in the part of the notice required
          by Subsection (b)(2). A notice under Subsection(b) is not valid if it does not substantially conform to the
          language and format prescribed by the comptroller under this subsection.

          (g) This section does not apply to a school district. A school district shall provide notice of a public hearing on a
          tax increase as required by Section 44.004, Education Code.

          Amended by 1981 Tex. Laws (1st C.S.), p. 164, ch. 13, Sec. 118; amended by 1983 Tex. Laws, p. 5464, ch. 1029, Sec. 1; amended by
          1985 Tex. Laws, p. 4995, ch. 657, Sec. 4; amended by 1985 Tex. Laws (1st C.S.), p. 30, ch. 1, Sec. 3; amended by 1987 Tex. Laws, ch.
          456, Sec. 1 and ch. 947, Sec. 8; amended by 1989 Tex. Laws, p. 4005, ch. 940, Sec. 1; amended by 1991 Tex. Laws (2nd C.S.), p. 36, ch.
          6, Sec. 46; amended by 1997 Tex. Laws, p. 560, ch. 165, Sec. 29.07, and p. 3910, ch. 1039, Secs. 28 and 29; amended by 1999 Tex. Laws,
          p. 2511, ch. 398, Sec. 4; amended by 1999 Tex. Laws, p. 4596, ch. 1358, Sec. 3.

          Cross References:

          Public hearing requirement, see art. VIII, Sec. 21, Tex. Const.
          Failure to comply, see Sec. 26.05.
          Public hearing ad, see Rule Sec. 9.17.
          School district notice of public hearing, see Section 44.004, Education Code.

          Notes:

          HB 328, 70th Leg., 1987, effective August 31, 1987, amended subsection (b) to provide for more information on the notice of public
          hearing for a tax increase than required by the amendment to this subsection by HB 1866, 70th Leg., 1987, effective January 1, 1988.

          A taxpayer or taxpayer group must present evidence that the debt calculations in the effective rate calculation do not accurately represent
          the actual bonded indebtedness of a taxing unit in challenging the accuracy of the effective rate calculation. Corpus Christi Taxpayer's
          Association v. City of Corpus Christi, 716 S.W.2d 578 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.).

          To be a newspaper of general circulation for the purpose of publishing legal notices, a newspaper must have more than a de minimis
          number of subscribers within a particular geographic region; must have a diverse subscribership; and must contain some news, editorials, and
          advertisements of a general character and interest to the community. Government Code Section 2051.044 lists four criteria of a newspaper
          in which a notice may be published. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JC-223 (2000).

     Sec. 26.065. Supplemental Notice of Hearing on Tax Rate Increase.

          (a) In addition to the notice required under Section 26.06, the governing body of a taxing unit required to hold a
          public hearing by Section 26.05(d) shall give notice of the hearing in the manner provided by this section.

          (b) If the taxing unit owns, operates, or controls an Internet website, the unit shall post notice of the public
          hearing on the website continuously for at least seven days immediately before the public hearing on the proposed
          tax rate increase and at least seven days immediately before the date of the vote proposing the increase in the tax
          rate.

          (c) If the taxing unit has free access to a television channel, the taxing unit shall request that the station carry a
          60-second notice of the public hearing at least five times a day between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m. for at
          least seven days immediately before the public hearing on the proposed tax rate increase and at least seven days
          immediately before the date of the vote proposing the increase in the tax rate.

          (d) The notice of the public hearing required by Subsection (b) must contain a statement that is substantially the
          same as the statement required by Section 26.06(b)(1) and must contain information that is substantially the same
          as the information required by Section 26.06(b)(2).

          (e) This section does not apply to a taxing unit if the taxing unit:

               (1) is unable to comply with the requirements of this section because of the failure of an electronic or
               mechanical device, including a computer or server; or

               (2) is unable to comply with the requirements of this section due to other circumstances beyond its
               control.

          (f) A person who owns taxable property is not entitled to an injunction restraining the collection of taxes by a
          taxing unit in which the property is taxable if the taxing unit has, in good faith, attempted to comply with the
          requirements of this section.

          Added by 1999 Tex. Laws, p. 4598, ch. 1358, Sec. 5.

          Cross References:

          Public hearing requirement, see art. VIII, Sec. 21, Tex. Const.
          Failure to comply, see Sec. 26.05.
          Public hearing ad, see Rule Sec. 9.17.
          School district notice of public hearing, see Section 44.004, Education Code.

     Sec. 26.07. Election To Repeal Increase.

          (a) If the governing body of a taxing unit other than a school district adopts a tax rate that exceeds the rollback
          tax rate calculated as provided by this chapter, the qualified voters of the taxing unit by petition may require that
          an election be held to determine whether or not to reduce the tax rate adopted for the current year to the rollback
          tax rate calculated as provided by this chapter.

          (b) A petition is valid only if:

               (1) it states that it is intended to require an election in the taxing unit on the question of reducing the tax
               rate for the current year;

               (2) it is signed by a number of registered voters of the taxing unit equal to at least 10 percent of the
               number of registered voters of the taxing unit according to the most recent official list of registered
               voters; and

               (3) it is submitted to the governing body on or before the 90th day after the date on which the governing
               body adopted the tax rate for the current year.

          (c) Not later than the 20th day after the day a petition is submitted, the governing body shall determine whether
          or not the petition is valid and pass a resolution stating its finding. If the governing body fails to act within the
          time allowed, the petition is treated as if it had been found valid.

          (d) If the governing body finds that the petition is valid (or fails to act within the time allowed), it shall order that
          an election be held in the taxing unit on a date not less than 30 or more than 90 days after the last day on which it
          could have acted to approve or disapprove the petition. A state law requiring local elections to be held on a
          specified date does not apply to the election unless a specified date falls within the time permitted by this section.
          At the election, the ballots shall be prepared to permit voting for or against the proposition: "Reducing the tax rate
          in (name of taxing unit) for the current year from (the rate adopted) to (the rollback tax rate calculated as
          provided by this chapter)."

          (e) If a majority of the qualified voters voting on the question in the election favor the proposition, the tax rate for
          the taxing unit for the current year is the rollback tax rate calculated as provided by this chapter; otherwise, the
          tax rate for the current year is the one adopted by the governing body.

          (f) If the tax rate is reduced by an election called under this section after tax bills for the unit are mailed, the
          assessor for the unit shall prepare and mail corrected tax bills. He shall include with the bill a brief explanation of
          the reason for and effect of the corrected bill. The date on which the taxes become delinquent for the year is
          extended by a number of days equal to the number of days between the date the first tax bills were sent and the
          date the corrected tax bills were sent.

          (g) If a property owner pays taxes calculated using the higher tax rate when the rate is reduced by an election
         called under this section, the taxing unit shall refund the difference between the amount of taxes paid and the
          amount due under the reduced rate if the difference between the amount of taxes paid and the amount due under
          the reduced rate is $1 or more. If the difference between the amount of taxes paid and the amount due under the
          reduced rate is less than $1, the taxing unit shall refund the difference on request of the taxpayer. An application
          for a refund of less than $1 must be made within 90 days after the date the refund becomes due or the taxpayer
          forfeits the right to the refund.

          (h) - (j) Expired in 1989.

          Amended by 1981 Tex. Laws (1st C.S.), p. 165, ch. 13, Sec. 119; amended by 1985 Tex. Laws (1st C.S.), p. 29, ch. 1, Sec. 3; amended by
          1987 Tex. Laws, ch. 457, Sec. 13 and ch. 947, Sec. 9; amended by 1993 Tex. Laws, p. 2863, ch. 728, Sec. 84, and by p. 1387, ch. 292,
          Sec. 1; amended by 1997 Tex. Laws, p. 561, ch. 165, Sec. 29.08.

          Cross References:

          Tax bills generally, see Sec. 31.01.
          Correction of tax roll, see Sec. 26.15.
          Delinquency date, see Sec. 31.02.
          Payment of interest on refunds, see Sec. 31.12.
          Refunds become due, see Sec. 31.12.

          Notes:

          Without reference to HB 344, 70th Leg., 1987, effective September 1, 1987, subsection (h) only was deleted by HB 1866, 70th Leg.,
          1987, effective January 1, 1988.

          HB 1866, 70th Leg., 1987, effective January 1, 1988, provides that a taxing unit that adopted an additional sales and use tax before the
          effective date of this bill calculates its 1988 effective and rollback tax rates following the formulas in Sec. 26.041(a), Tax Code.

          Section 26.07, Tax Code, is constitutional as applied to counties. This section does not contravene art. VIII, Sec. 1-a, or art. VIII, Sec. 9.
          Vinson v. Burgess, Winborne v. Commissioners Court of Ellis County, 733 S.W.2d 263 (Tex. 1989).

          A finding of a commissioners' court that a tax rate rollback petition was invalid on grounds other than those listed in Sec. 26.07, Tax Code,
          did not relieve a citizen/petitioner from the burden of proving that the rollback petition was valid. Parker v. White, 852 S.W.2d 748 (Tex.
          App.-Tyler 1993, no writ).

          Rollback of taxes is constitutional as applied to counties. Winborne v. Commissioners Court of Ellis County, 757 S.W.2d 876 (Tex.
          App.-Waco 1988, affirmed).

          Section 26.07, Property Tax Code, violates the provisions of art. VIII, Secs. 1-a and 9, Tex. Const., and is unconstitutional with respect to
          counties. Vinson v. Burgess, 755 S.W.2d 481 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 1988, reversed).

          The courts cannot interrupt the rollback election process once it has begun; absentee voting establishes that the election process has
          started. Port Isabel/South Padre Island Taxpayers Association v. South Padre Island, 721 S.W.2d 405 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1986, no
          writ).

          Rollback elections are constitutional for hospital districts because the constitution confers the authority to provide for hospital district
          taxation on the legislature rather than directly on the hospital district; Sec. 26.07 does not unconstitutionally suspend Sec. 26.05, which
          authorizes the setting of a tax rate. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-859 (1988).

          Section 26.07 is unconstitutional to the extent that it limits the authority of a county commissioners court under art. VIII, Secs. 1-a and 9,
          Tex. Const., to set tax rate general fund, farm-to-market flood control, or public road maintenance taxes. These tax rates may not be
          rolled back. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-792 (1987).

          The county assessor calculates the effective tax rate for each of the county's funds and adds them together for the county's total effective
          rate; the county must exceed eight percent of the total county effective rate, not one of its components, before local voters can invoke
          the tax rate rollback provisions; and, the county is not required to apportion any tax increase among the funds. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No.
          JM-677 (1987).

          The county commissioners are not authorized to accept a rollback election petition unless the rate adopted exceeds the effective tax rate
          by more than eight percent, plus the amount necessary for indigent health care costs specifically protected by statute from such rollback;
          and, the assessor is not empowered to recalculate the effective tax rate for any inaccuracy after the tax plan is in effect, unless a taxpayer
          timely files an injunction. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-641 (1987).

          A petition for a tax rollback election that consists in part of copies of signatures comprising a previously submitted and rejected petition
          does not comport with the requirement that such petition be signed by a requisite number of voters. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-574
          (1986).

          Where a taxing unit adopts a tax rate that includes a component for providing services required by the Indigent Health Care and Treatment
          Act, and a successful election under Sec. 26.07 reduces the adopted rate, the new rate is set at eight percent over the effective rate plus the
          additional percentage attributable to the required health care costs. Op. Tex. Att'y Gen. No. JM-528 (1986).

          The most recent official list of qualified voters in Secs. 26.07 and 26.08, Tax Code, means the current and up-to-date list of all voters who
          reside in the taxing unit and whose registrations are effective on or before the date upon which the petition is submitted for the
          consideration of the governing body; the Texas Election Code requires each voter registrar to provide a taxing unit holding an election
          with an appropriate list of registered voters that will be current on the date of the election. Op. Election Law JWF-10 (1983).
 

Carole Keeton Strayhorn
Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
                                                                          Window on State Government
                                                                                        Contact Us
                                                                            Privacy and Security Policy

 

 

                                        

    





                            

 

  Ward politics is the Devil's key to the soul of the city council.  It is how some council members got themselves in trouble in the past.  It is the bait that will get others in trouble in the future. 4/6/8