|
| |
12/17/04 Newcomer thinks she knows
what's good for Dallas (better than us locals).
Editor's comments:
If any DallasArena.com readers want to respond to our world-traveled newcomer
(who left better places to come to Dallas), feel free. sb
Sharon C: Misguided
Dear Ms. Boyd -
I recently have 'discovered' your website when researching local city
politics. Granted I am new to the area (since June) so I am
definitely not overly educated about the issues, but I do know this:
Dallas is years behind other comparable cities. And it seems to be
every new initiative being proposed to improve the city is being
opposed by you.
Great, we can keep the stagnation that Dallas apparently is legendary
to have had. I don't know how long you have lived in the area, but
maybe you are unaware of the amenities other cities have. I have
lived in both Houston and Austin, and both are years ahead of Dallas
in the amenities offered to their citizens and I do not remember being
taxed more than I am in this city. So what is the problem?
You're so opposed to the Cowboys stadium? My first instinct is to say
that your position is short-sighted.
What other team is as well known as the Dallas Cowboys - you do recall
they are America's team?
Did you consider in your analysis to reject the
stadium that we will lose the Texas/OU game now? Of course, there
are lost revenues, but what about the loss of a weekend that
defines Dallas, the loss of the ability for
Dallas to showcase itself to 100,000 future potential
Dallas citizens, etc... Did you consider the fact
that Fairpark would have enjoyed a resurgance and would have
received infrastructure that is LONG overdue? Have you looked at
other cities and their sports parks and how they have truly helped to
develop the city? What about city branding? Is that worth nothing to
you? Sure, it's lame that the city would have had to pay for some of
it and it's lamer that Jerry Jones would have been the one to benefit
- but that trend has been established by all the other NFL teams with
new stadiums before us.
So now you are opposed to the Trinity River Project. Sheesh! Have
you been to other cities and seen what a central public park with
running trails, fields, picnic areas has done for the socialization of
the city? What about the fact that the project will fix the ancient
problem of flooding in South Dallas so they might actually stand a
chance of re-developing that area. Instead of being anti-everything -
how about being pro-something? Or suggest something positive in its
stead.
Ultimately, there is a reason Dallas has trouble. There are no
'killer apps' (i.e. compelling reasons to live in the city.) You have
high crime, poor schools and nothing that great keeping people who
make money, build the tax base and those who would actually be
politically active in the city. How many people live in central
Austin to have access to Town Lake and downtown Austin? What else do
you think drove the gentrification and subsequent increase in tax base
for that city.
Same thing in Houston - a revitalized downtown, brought people back
into the city where people re-energized the neighborhoods... You
have a tax base that is much less than it should be b/c anyone making
money moves out of the city b/c of its incompetency. You yell and
scream at Park Cities residents... I would have hoped you would have
learned this back in school, but the reason capitalism is successful
is because people act in their own best interest. So instead of
wailing against Park Cities and their ability to have a community that
best serves their needs, why don't you work to make Dallas a place
where those in Park Cities, Plano and Southlake would actually want to
live?!?
So you can reject every initiative to make Dallas better, but then
don't complain when people flee the city for Park Cities, Plano and
Frisco.
And before you last out at me - I own a home in Vickery Place, have a
good job downtown, volunteer/contribute money to my community and
would like to see Dallas become all it can be. But I can tell you
this, if the crime and schools in Dallas don't improve, when I marry
and have kids, I am likely to move out. There is nothing compelling
me to live inside the city except for a short commute and b/c Dallas
has been so anti-friendly to business we have all the major businesses
like Frito, EDS, etc.. out in Plano - so most people don't even have
that incentive to live in the city.
I can't help thinking that people like you are the problem with
Dallas. Maybe this is premature of me to say. Not the Laura Millers.
Why people in Dallas are so opposed to the population actually having
the power to hire and fire the person actually making the decisions in
Dallas is BEYOND me. A strong mayor is good for Dallas - Laura Miller
is only the mayor now. How can she even be judged whether she has
done a good or bad job - she has had no ability to do anything... I
likely would have voted for the other candidate if I had been here,
but fair is fair. Give her and the future mayors a chance. Give them
the power to do their job and fulfill their promises. Just b/c you
don't like their promises - that is not your call. The voters voted
Laura Miller in and deserve to see her capabilities.
That said, I do appreciate your web site and it has provided me with
quite a bit of information regarding the local scene. I appreciate
it.
Editor's comments: I responded with, "I
have lived here all my life. Dallas natives love what we once had. A
clean city that took care of its citizens and did not neglect the city's
upkeep to chase after tourists and sports jock sniffers. The greatest
mayor we ever had was Eric Jonson who "let the Cowboys
go to Irving".
If the other cities where you lived in your world travel are so superior to
Dallas, why did you leave? Why don't you go back?
Sports arenas/stadiums never deliver on their promises. Why do you think
Irving did not fight harder to keep the Cowthugs? See any big
development around Texas Stadium or Reunion Arena or
even the Hicks/Perot Arena? The only stuff seriously
happening around the AAC was already on the blocks
before the arena site was even picked by the Robber Barons.
You are typical of the superficial city-surfers who never put down
roots and think they know better than the simple locals who have a
lifetime commitment to this city.
So, please don't even start lecturing me. This is my hometown, and I know
it was a better city before we got our priorities caught up with tourists
and keeping up with the opinions of people who have no ties to
Dallas. sb"
She responded with another dissertation. I'm too exhausted to try to help
her. You guys go ahead. sb
Sharon C:
Hi there -
Unfortunately for you, people who grew up in Dallas are not sticking
around and you're offering little to the new people who come here to
motivate them to want to stick around. There lies the folly in your
thinking - you need new people to come to the city as much as you
might not like it, b/c growth drives revenue which drives city
development.
Trust me, I am not a sports jocks sniffer ;-). I voted against the
Astros stadium in Houston using the same logic as yours back in the
day. But I have seen what that stadium has done for Houston's
downtown. Of course, stadiums don't help places
like Irving and Arlington - they help major
metropolitan cities like Dallas. You do know that
Houston got the SuperBowl and that revenue b/c of their new
stadium, right? And finally can you completely dismiss 'quality of
life'? I understand that you might not be into sports - neither am I.
But I understand that for many people venues like that draws them to
a city - and unlike you I believe that is necessary to keep talent
coming into the area which in turn attracts companies which in turn
brings tax base revenue. Plus, I see blighted areas like Fair Park
that need help - and if its not the stadium it's something else that
needs to be done to turn it from the cess pool it has become.
You think uptown and that whole area had nothing to do with the AA
stadium? You would have that area still be in shambles b/c it didn't
help you out in North Dallas.
Alas for you, I pay taxes like you, vote like you and will be sticking
around. You know in some places they actually think new blood is a
good thing - especially when the old blood has never been able to fix
the problems that exist.
I am not a city surfer, but I apologize if living in other cities to
pursue education makes me a city surfer and one who does not put down
roots in your eyes. I grew up in Shreveport until 18 when I went to
college in Houston and afterwards worked there for 4 years. Went to
grad school in Austin and then moved here because I got a great job
opportunity, both of my siblings are here and I wanted a city I could
put down 'roots'. That is my entire point. People like me in my late
20's/early 30's finally get to a point where they can put down roots,
but the cities have to have something to offer them. I will be
sticking around because I see the potential for Dallas. Honestly, I
benefit from the fact that Dallas has yet to develop inside the city
like other major metropolitan areas in that I was able to purchase a
home inside the city for a reasonable price and I am optimistic that
many of the current problems in the city will be fixed by the time I
have kids. Ironic, you would think that a new person like myself with
a good job, an interest in the city's future who moves into the city,
buys a run-down home, renovates it and tries to improve an old
neighborhood inside Dallas would be appreciated by a local Dallas-ite.
I suppose if it's not old money and North Dallas you aren't
interested in newbies contributions.
I have a friend who lives in Koppel- he wants to
move to my area because he see tremendous upside. He
has a wife and child, though, and worries about
sending his kid to the public schools near me when the
schools in Koppel are so good. So is he too a city
surfer? And yes, what draws him to the city are
amenities the city has to offer!
I mean your answer to people who want to move to a city and are
evaluating it can't be to say - you haven't lived her your whole life
and I have so I know better... Do you have any interest in current
run-down Dallas neighborhoods being revitalized?
I have a feeling it's not the old-timers like you who
are going to do the much needed work to turn those
neighborhoods around.
Also, the way the city currently is, it is only outfitted to attract
individuals who tend to not have roots - i.e. singles and younger
people - b/c crime is bad and education is poor. People putting down
roots are doing it out in Southlake and Plano in case you haven't
noticed.
Yes, the sad truth is Dallas is a product as are other cities that
people and companies choose to invest in when they move there. And
sad for you, people consider things like art districts, parks and
avenues for entertainment when they move to a city. Not everyone has
family in Dallas. That does not mean they would not make good
citizens.
Many people chose not to take better jobs because they do not want to
live in that city - as I can attest having just been through that
myself with 400 other classmates. Uptown is the
reason 50+ of my classmates chose to settle here and I
am guessing you were probably opposed to that as
well. For you to dismiss their concerns is
short-sighted and definitely not in the city's best interest. It is
in your interest to have people move to this city with good incomes
and settle here.
Editor's Comments: I lived in the Oak Lawn/Uptown area for 28 years and
spent about 24 years serving on the Oak Lawn Committee which supported the
zoning that allowed Uptown to happen. Most of Uptown is inside the Oak
Lawn Planned Development District and was called Oak Lawn until the developers
decided they wanted a separate community identification. sb
And finally, just because I have said other things have worked in
cities does not mean I do not like this city and see the potential to
love it. The current system is obviously not working. Strong mayors
have been effective in other cities, maybe you should consider giving
it a shot. You could have come up with a ballot for a strong mayor
initiative more to your liking, but you didn't. Kudos to Mrs.
Blackwood for caring enough to do something.
| |

|