|
Citizen D Michael Davis Rad Field
| |
09/20/04 Crack
Head's Lifestyle Killed Him, NOT the Police.
A Dallas County Grand Jury no-billed 7 DPD officers
last week in the death of an obese crack head who had inflicted all of his ills
on himself and anyone within reach of his self-destructive ways.
In July, I commented on how badly these 7 Policemen were being treated in
WHAT MAKES THEM DO IT?.
I was surprised when several people I consider smart and pro-cop said Chief
Kunkle was right to pull them off the street even if it made our city less safe
and even it was terribly unfair to the officers. One truly big shot called
me about my comments -- didn't convince me but certainly impressed me.
I stand by my original position that we were punishing the good guys and the fat
crack head killed himself. I was also under the impression in July that
the officers did use the choke hold to try to subdue the 300 lb crazed wacko.
I do now concede that having the Grand Jury "no-bill" these officers is a
stronger validation of their innocence than anything else that could be done.
With the huge financial hit most of the 7 officers took as a result, they
may not think it's a fair trade off.
After the Grand Jury no-billed the 7 Policemen this week, a DPD officer sent the
following to DallasArena.com:
| |
| |
Observant Officer:
Chief Kunkle is not winning the
battle for hearts and minds inside DPD, and
certainly not any of the 7 officers
he placed on "restricted" duty for being on the
scene when Pedro Fernandez, Jr died.
Contrary to press reports, the
Lateral Vascular Neck restraint (LVNR) was not used on Fernandez.
There was no wrong-doing. There
were no strikes performed with batons -- other than those
thrown by Fernandez, there were no punches thrown.
He was struck one time on the
shoulder in an attempt to dislodge his arm from under his enormous bulk
(a perfectly legal technique.) That's it. Nothing
else.
The Medical Examiner
(who doesn't work for DPD) found no
evidence of trauma anywhere. No bruises. No
broken bones. Not even suspicious marks.
None.
The M.E. was tired of the cries of
racists and decided to leave it on the DA's
doorstep and rule the death a homicide.
Fernandez
died because he was 5'6" and weighed 320+ pounds.
Fernandez
died because his heart was twice the size it should have been and was
70% blocked with plaque.
Fernandez
died because he had a fatty liver.
Fernandez
died because he was on methamphetamine and had drank an 18-pack
of beer within a 3-hour period.
Fernandez
died because he was "restrained."
Fernandez
died because he was psychologically stressed.
Just hours before meeting with
members of the Hispanic community, Chief Kunkle decided to
place all 7 officers on restrictive duty.
No overtime. No
extra-jobs. Chief Kunkle did not meet with
the 7 officers. Chief
Kyle Royster told the officers of their reassignment.
Chief Kunkle has yet to meet with the 7
officers or offer any kind of explanation.
Chief Kunkle has never apologized for
leaving us without any support, and actions made
the 7 officers look guilty. An
officer's greatest asset in this department is his
reputation. The reputation of those 7 officers have
been severely damaged because of Chief Kunkle's decision.
No officers that I've talked to about this situation think
the Chief did the right thing. We
look at those 7 officers' situation as
they were doing their
job. They were working hard and following
policy. Instead of being rewarded for their
efforts, they were punished. Their
names have been dragged through the mud by
every two-bit reporter from here to Brownsville, as far West
as San Jose, CA and as far East as Atlanta, GA.
Chief Kunkle may have thought he was back
in Tarrant County where cases go to the Grand Jury
within 2-3 weeks.
Fernandez died on June 29th. The case was heard by the
Dallas County Grand Jury on September 17th. That's 10
weeks.
To date, some of
the 7 officers have lost as much as $3000
(or more) in income due to lost overtime, which
DPD officers routinely work --
roughly a month's salary.
Chief Kunkle's policy is a
punishment. It's a punishment that
DPD officers cannot appeal. It's
the moral and financial equivalent to a
one month suspension without pay.
Funny thing,
Chief Kunkle wants his officers to feel comfortable talking to the press.
He encourages it.
God help him if a reporter sticks a microphone in my face and asks me
anything, not to mention any of those 7 offices
victimized by Fernandez and Chief Kunkle. The
public will know exactly how the rank and file feels about this policy.
We thought the mayor was callous by
saying that an officer should use his sick or vacation benefits to help out
when severely injured in
the line of duty. By his actions action,
Chief Kunkle is telling
officers they need a good savings
account in case someone dies while they are doing
their jobs.
This policy has many officers afraid
to do their jobs for fear of losing their homes or being forced into
bankruptcy. I am
hoping to buy a house this year
and using my overtime from the last half of the year as a down
payment. Had I been one of those 7 officers,
I'ld be working my tail off for the next three
months just trying to catch up.
Chief Kunkle is fond of pointing out
that his troops call him Uncle Kunkle. Uncle?
In whose family? Not
mine.
|
|
Our Observant Officer says no
choke hold was used, no baton, etc. If that's the case (and I believe
him), restricting them to desk duty for 10 weeks was wrong and punitive to the
good guys. Even if they did use a choke hold, it would have been justified
and they should have been allowed to work their overtime and extra jobs.
I know some Presidential candidates think you can reason and strive to
communicate with bad guys and lunatics, and they will be won over by the effort
you made to "understand" their concerns and wants. That's baloney on an
international level, and it's almost suicidal on a local level when cops are
dealing with wackos high on drugs instead of religious fanaticism.
Police and firefighters do not stop being human when they step between us and
the bad guys. They only show us the difference between them and most of us
wienies. They stand up and step out, when most of us crouch down to
protect ourselves.
Before you read this little
excerpt from Holly Yan's DMN report on the Grand Jury no-billing the 7 officers
(it wasn't much longer than the sections cited), I want to ask when a Dallas
Grand Jury started being "a grand jury"? A Grand Jury is the ultimate
citizen service, and each Grand Jury is essential to making our system of crime
and punishment work successfully. It offends me when Belo allows its
reporters to belittle important citizen service, while promoting race baiters
and trial lawyers like the guy representing the crack head's family.
 |
Grand jury declines to indict 7 officers in
suspect's death:
Man died while being restrained; paramedics also
won't face charges
September
17, 2004 By HOLLY YAN / The Dallas
Morning News
|
A grand jury declined to indict seven
Dallas police officers Friday after they were investigated in the death of a
man who died in police custody in June.
Pedro Fernandez, 33, passed out and
died during a struggle with police officers trying to arrest him.
The officers used pepper spray and a controversial
neck hold to try to restrain Mr. Fernandez.
The Dallas County
medical examiner's office ruled the case a homicide
and found that the 300-pound man's death was
influenced by an enlarged heart, severely clogged arteries, restraint
asphyxia, physiologic stress, and cocaine and methamphetamine use.
The seven officers ? Benustiano
Avila, Brandi Kramer, Julio Ortiz, Michael Pottorff, Randall Presley, Chad
Smith and Glenn Thompson ? will return to full duty within the next few
days, Dallas police Lt. Todd Thomasson said.
... the grand jury declined to indict three paramedics who treated
Mr. Fernandez before he died.
Raul Loya, an attorney for Mr. Fernandez's family, ...
saying the ruling was influenced by the Police Department's conflict
of interest in presenting the case.
"I don't think [health problems]
contributed to his death," Mr. Loya said. ... "he
had six officers on top of him, with pepper spray in his lungs, to purposely
injure him."
... district attorney's office, said the family
never provided authorities with a separate autopsy report disputing the
Dallas County medical examiner's findings.
"We had delayed
the grand jury in order for them to secure that, and they did not."...
|
Over all, Ms. Yan seems to have
fairly assessed the situation, but our
Observant Officer
says "the Lateral
Vascular Neck restraint (LVNR) was not used on Fernandez".
This is a serious mistake on a DMN reporter's part to assume an allegation as
fact.
More of what we can expect from Belo if they keep slashing their reporting
budget and hiring the likes of Katie Menzer and Yolanda Walker to
cover stories they either know nothing about or are too lazy to get the facts or
interview all parties involved -- or all of the above.
Observant Officer
says "Chief
Kunkle wants his officers to feel comfortable talking to the press.
He encourages it."
The DMN Reporter named the 7 officers victimized by Fernandez' death-by
lifestyle. Since she had no problem identifying them, why didn't she call
one of them? Guess she's a recorder/reporter like Yolanda Walker.
The only good thing about Belo having some inept recorder/reporters at WFAA (Ch.
8) and at the DMN, it makes the good reporters really stand out and shine.
DMN Reporter Yan's term "grand jury declined to indict" is also very telling
about her mindset, and possibly Belo's mindset toward what they wanted the Grand
Jury to do. There is no doubt in my mind Our Downtown Betters (the "ODB")
wanted some if not all of our 7 police officers indicted to show how
"progressive" Dallas has become. |
|
|
Officer C:
Nice article by
Rad Field.
Citizens need to remember that every non-lethal option an officer
has is one he must preclude prior to using deadly force.
If an officer feels the situation
requires a deadly force response, the officer needs only use one type of
deadly force. In other words, if an
officer only has four options (baton, o/c spray, TASER
or a firearm), the officer must preclude
the use of each of the first three before moving to the final and
deadliest.
That isn't to say that an officer facing
a gun or even a knife must first spray the suspect with o/c spray. That
situation would be a deadly force encounter and
would justify using a
firearm first.
An officer facing a combative, unarmed
suspect must show each step of the force continuum has been tried and
failed or was ineffective by the nature of the suspect's action and the
officer's training.
The more options an officer has the
better for the officer and for the public in
general.
The LVNR is now on the level of
deadly force. Would you put yourself
within striking distance of a combative suspect to use the LVNR when you
could simply use a firearm from a greater distance with less chance of
injury to yourself? I wouldn't.
So while most activists think they are
protecting people from police they are actually
putting the criminal element in greater danger of being shot by police.
Each option taken away puts you one option closer to a firearm.
TASERS will be great if they are placed
in the force continuum at the proper level -- at
the same level as o/c spray. Anything
higher will make it impossible for an officer to properly respond to a
dynamic situation.
|
|
We don't allow Our
Officers to hit deranged crack heads
with a baton, even when the officers are trying to protect themselves.
We don't allow Our
Officers to use the choke hold, even
when Our Officers
are trying to protect another DPD officer.
Heaven forbid one of
Our Officers shoots a suspect about to
take the officer's life or having just or about to injure or kill another DPD
officer or a Dallas citizen!
We have pretty much told
Our Officers they are supposed to
stand back and watch while the bad guys, crazed crack heads, etc. spread mayhem
and chaos across our city.
| |
|
|
| |
WHAT MAKES THEM DO IT?, DallasArena.com,
July 19, 2004.
A couple of weeks ago, a woman called for police help when her husband or boy
friend was threatening her -- her 300 lb crack head husband or boyfriend.
The guy attacked the officers, and eventually 7 cops were on the scene trying to
subdue him. He died from his efforts, and suddenly the crack head who was
terrorizing his wife is an innocent victim of police brutality and 7 police
officers are off the street and not available to protect law abiding citizens.
This just makes me sick.
That crack head was headed for a bad end and
would likely take someone with him or ruin several lives in the process.
Those 7 police officers are now paying the price for responding to a call for
assistance. You and I are without the services of 7 police officers
because they responded to that woman's call for help.
At a crime watch meeting this year, an officer told us about a 27 year old
married policeman with two kids who may have contracted AIDS from a bite by a
crack head who had just smashed an elderly lady's car and fled from the scene.
After they caught and handcuffed him, he butted his head into one
officer's face and broke that officer's nose. The 27 year old cop tried to
subdue him, and the crack head bit a hunk out of his hand. They
automatically run an AIDS test now on the arrestee in those situations.
The crack head had full blown AIDS.
Are you exposed to that kind of risk when you go to work?
...
Why does anyone don a uniform to put themselves between us and the bad guys when
they know something can happen that day to destroy their career or their life? |
|
| |
|
|
I still don't know why our cops
and firefighters do what they do for so little pay and so little appreciation.
Most DMN columnists are liberal and stand ready to side AGAINST any police
officer in any dispute with a criminal suspect. If they don't outright
accuse the officer of doing wrong, they do it with innuendos and one-side
reporting.
At this point, I want to say something very plain and bold. Minorities are
just as capable as Big Bad Whitey of doing wrong.
Just by their surnames, two of the 7 victimized police officers are Hispanic.
Do you really believe they would have stood by and let the other 5 officers
abuse an innocent Hispanic who was only trying to protect himself?
If you do believe the version of the ambulance chaser representing the fat crack
head's family, why are you reading DallasArena.com? To believe that guy's
claim, you have to believe that minorities are not capable of making grown up
decisions or leading normal, law-abiding lives. To believe that guy's
claim, you have to think all Hispanic men abuse their families, abuse drugs and
alcohol and eat themselves into a suicidal condition. To believe that
guy's claim, you have to be a bigot.
My neighborhood is almost 50% (if not more) Hispanic. Sometimes a party
gets a little loud and last a little too late -- but not often. Some
neighbors have too many cars for their driveway and park on the street, which
annoys the heck out of the rest of us. It is no white-bread neighborhood,
but it's a wonderful neighborhood. I chair our Crime Watch/HOA group and
see the crime stats for our beat. We don't see the police even having to
stop at a house very often and never to resolve a violent situation that
Fernandez was inflicting on his family the night he died.
If my neighbors are typical of Hispanic men (and I know they are), anyone who
believes that Fernandez is a typical Hispanic male is a bigot.
Police officers deal with the bottom of the bucket of humanity. They
expect to less from an Hispanic man or an African-American man than they do from
a White man. Anyone who thinks cops should make allowances for bad
behavior from an ethnic minority is a bigot.
That's what it comes down to -- the ODB, many reporters, so-called minority
leaders all think so little of Hispanic and African-American men that they don't
think they are capable of being law-abiding adults. It's not the cops who
are the bigots.
Everything should not be about race in this city. We have one of the
smartest men in town who is an aviator himself being considered for a vacancy on
the DFW Board. Because the person leaving is Asian-American, suddenly that
seat must be assigned to another Asian-American. Our Mayor's adversaries
on the council (all four Black council members) are already trying to turn a
simple DFW Board appointment into a race issue, rather than selecting the most
qualified person available.
 |
Pursuit of D/FW board spot lays council rifts bare:
White businessman, Asian lawyer seek job with contracts on line
September
17, 2004 By DIANNE SOL? / The Dallas
Morning News |
... For those in the
minority community, serving on the board also represents an
opportunity to see that minority and women entrepreneurs get a strong shot
at business contracts.
... Some of the most lucrative contracts are
expected to be announced this fall for concessions, dining and shopping at
the new international terminal. That terminal ? known as Terminal D ? is set
to open in the summer of 2005.
... Mr. Collmer, who is 69, is favored by some
City Council members because of his past board experience.
... Mr. Collmer's candidacy, however, may suffer
because of the belief that he is backed by the mayor ?
a factor that could further aggravate racial tensions at the City Council,
said two people familiar with the appointment process. Just two weeks ago,
in a discussion over subsidizing football games, Dr. Maxine Thornton-Reese,
a black Dallas City Council member, publicly accused Ms. Miller of prejudice
and pushing "the white agenda."
Mr. Collmer is also a former chairman
of the Greater Dallas Chamber of Commerce.
... Mr. Hsueh, who is 53, said he was asked by
City Council member Don Hill, who is black, to
consider the board appointment.
"Duty calls, so I said OK," Mr. Hsueh
said, "and then I realized I was being drawn into city
politics. I just want to do it based on my merits and not who I know in
politics." ...
|
Mr. Hsueh should understand
that nothing Don Hill does is based on merit. If you believe Don Hill or
Brain-Dead Thornton-Reese are remotely concerned about the Asian-American
community representation on city boards or commissions, you are an idiot.
In the first place, the Asian-American community in Dallas County is much larger
than the Asian-American community in the City of Dallas. There are only 7
Dallas seats to be filled. White Dallas citizens are still the largest
ethnic group, even if a combination of all other groups is larger.
It is stupid and bigoted to divide all government decisions along racial lines.
It benefits no one except race baiters like Hill, T-Reese and their gang.
Two weeks ago Our Mayor correctly said the council had rewarded bad behavior by
giving in to Shakedown Chaney and Brain-Dead T-Reese. Now, Our Mayor has
backtracked and blames herself for the scam that Chaney and T-Reese pulled off.
 |
Mayor's really trying this time:
September 15, 2004
By JAMES RAGLAND / The Dallas Morning News |
... Just because the mayor may not always be on
the same page with black council members doesn't mean she's not trying to
improve her standing in the black community.
... "When she speaks, she speaks as though
she speaks for the whole city, and that's not the case," said
Steve Williams, an aide to Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Don
Hill, the ranking black council member. "And I think they [the black
council members] have had enough of it."
... Political savvy is best gauged on the field,
and that's where Ms. Miller occasionally steps on land mines.
The latest example was the big blowup
over whether the city should dole out money to support the annual
Grambling-Prairie View A&M football game.
... the mayor's not entirely at fault for the
volcano that erupted.
... "Well, that clearly was a hard day," Ms.
Miller told me last week. "We had a lot of issues that brought race into it,
and feelings were just raw that day."
... "We want the mayor to be successful," Mr. Hill
told me last week. "But it has to be on the council's terms and not just the
mayor's terms."
The black council members must meet
the mayor halfway if Ms. Miller is sincerely trying to find solutions to
problems that affect their communities.
More than that, they shouldn't play
the race card ? as Dr. Maxine Thornton-Reese did by yelling out loud that
the mayor is pushing a "white agenda" ? to embarrass Ms. Miller or gain
political leverage.
Our city is too fragile for that.
The mayor acknowledged that she must
mend some fences, ... "Maxine
has every right to get mad and yell at me," she said. "It's my job to
sit down and make sure my relationship is good with everybody, and I do that
every single day." ... |
I've already screamed at Our
Mayor personally over her "hit me again" comments to Ragland. She was not
the bad doer, she was not the council member trying to pull off another
shakedown and misuse of taxpayer funds, she was not the council member playing
the race card. Our Mayor was trying to spend our tax dollars responsibly.
Shakedown Chaney's plan was to divert our tax dollars to the promoter of the
Grambling-Prairie View game, not to the teams. Chaney just wound up
T-Reese to spout something stupid to cover his fat, crooked rear.
Brain-Dead forgot her lines and resorted to her favorite race baiting mantra.
Being a typical bleeding heart liberal, Our Mayor thinks we should accept less
than adult behavior from minority council members. If she doesn't respect
herself enough to punish T-Reese for that stunt, Our Mayor should at least
respect the Mayor's Office enough to strip that stupid bigot of any committee
chair she holds.
Our Mayor should have adjourned the meeting for a few minutes and said "Dr.
Thornton-Reese needs to go into TIME-OUT for a few minutes. She's been a
bad girl."
That's what the current parenting experts say you do when a child
misbehaves or throws a temper tantrum -- put them in time out.
Our Mayor must be willing to stand up for the dignity of her office, for which
ALL Dallas voters get to vote -- not just a few dead people near Pleasant Grove.
To allow bad behavior from a minority council member means she expects less from
them than she would from a White elected official. An example of "the soft
bigotry of low expectations."
A terrible injustice was done to 7 fine police officers because our elected and
appointed city officials are so subject to screams of racial prejudice that they
bend over backwards to avoid confrontations with minority leaders. Is
there no elected official who will call the race baiters' bluff?
Because we only have one daily paper (not as widely circulated as they once led
us and their advertisers to believe), the ODB and the professional race baiters
are likely to continue to control the rest of us by guilt trips and outright
deception.
Surely, there's someone out there who will step up and step out and call out
these wimps and race baiters.
sb
| |

|