|
Andrae Cox Anonycop
| |
07/22/04 ODB and Our Stepford Mayor
going for an end around.
People can sometimes just get too clever by half.
 |
|
Our Mayor could not get what she wanted from her
Charter Review Commission, so her new ODB friends are going to spend some of their large $$ to change our
city
manager form of government to a strong mayor system.
Rather than accept her will may not be that of the city at large, Our Mayor has
turned to Our Downtown Betters to come at us from the back door of a high dollar
public relations campaign and the vote fraud the ODB are willing to fund. |
It's hard to get accustomed to my adversarial relationship with Laura Miller.
Everything she does is a new shock to me, even when it's the same thing she did
the week before.
Dr. W. K. Gordon,
III:
Remember when Laura first got elected and the strong mayor
issue was being batted around?
Most of the talk was basically:
"Yeah, it would be great as long as Laura or someone like her is mayor --
but what if we get another Ron Kirk"?
Laura herself has answered that
question. We didn't have to wait for another
crooked mayor like Kirk to illustrate the perils
of a strong mayor system. She is a living
caricature of the politician who lays out a platform to get elected then
abandons that platform once ensconced in the office.
Once so ensconced, it is just as difficult
to remove the mayor as it is to remove a crooked City Manager like we had
with the Kirk/Ware duo.
Sadly, she has made herself the
poster child for the anti-strong mayor movement. |
Wednesday evening, WFAA/Ch. 8's Chris Heinbaugh broke the news that David Laney
was organizing a petition drive to get a charter amendment on the May ballot to
replace our city manager system with the ODB preferred strong mayor system.
Mayor Miller appointed Laney to Chair the Charter Review Commission, which did
not recommend changing from our city manager system. African-Americans on
the Commission were adamantly opposed to a Strong Mayor System.
So am I!
 |
City charter changes could come down to vote
Wednesday, July 21, 2004
By Chris Heinbaugh /
WFAA-TV |
In a move that could turn Dallas city
governemnt on its head, voters may get to choose or reject a strong mayor
form of government.
However, the effort may not come out
of City Hall; it may be a referendum instead.
Since 1931, Dallas has been run by a
string of city managers. Some feel it's time for a strong mayor to run the
show instead. but the City Council has not moved to change the city's
charter.
... Attorney David Laney, the former head of the
Charter Review Commission, is exploring the idea for a group of business
leaders. ... told News 8 it would be "a test
before the electorate, something that has not been diluted and filtered by
the City Council."
... James Fantroy promised he'll sue in federal
court to stop it.
... John Edmonds of the Foundation for Community
Empowerment thinks the City Manager system no longer works for Dallas. He
said voters may have to make the change themselves.
... Mayor Laura Miller may be a likely
cheerleader; she has long called for a strong-mayor system. She said she's
not involved in the effort, but in an e-mail said, "I think it is critical
for the future ... I think it would be approved by voters."
... To take a city charter change to voters, they
must first gather supporters and campaign cash, then assemble 59,000
signatures of qualified voters in 60 days. ... |
Don't you believe for one minute that Laura Miller is
"not involved in the effort".
With what we've seen from Our Stepford Mayor, you cannot believe anything she
says. I'm still convinced she is a stand in for the Laura Miller who was
elected to the city council. Then again, maybe she's the Manchurian
Candidate of Dallas politics.
James Northrup:
A bit disingenuous for David Laney to be pushing this
when it was clear from the testimony in front of
his commission that most folks did not want to go
back to a mayoral form of government. This is what comes from not
having a strong city manager. From a council that micro manages
without a strategic plan. And a mayor that is now
little more than a photo-op junkie.
Simple solution here is to get the
best city manager, keep council from meddling and
elect a mayor that can build a consensus and manage it. |
David Laney is part of the ODB group who want to put Downtown Dallas under a
separate governing commission that can levy taxes, etc. Oh, sure, some
claim the council will have the final say, but this council will rubber stamp
everything that commission puts before them. There's no way people like
Gary Griffith, et al will thwart the biggest campaign donors in town.
Half the commission will not be required to be Dallas residents. Finally,
the Park Cities crowd who have always controlled Dallas City Hall and how Dallas
tax money is spent will have a seat at a real table, rather than just pulling
the strings of whichever mayor is in office at the time.
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Walter Mensch:
This was published in the Letters to the Editor of The Dallas
Morning News during Our
Mayor's last campaign.
I was puzzled when I first read it,
but saved it for future
reference. Sure enough, Donna Blumer was
absolutely correct in her assessment, and the
rest of us dead wrong. We need to draft this woman to run for
mayor next time. I don't think Donna Blumer
would dupe us.
Meanwhile, I'd like to get a refund
of my hard-earned contributions to Miller's
campaign, as they were apparently obtained under false
pretenses. |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Had I been ambivalent about the city manager vs. strong mayor issue, having the ODB come out so brazenly
supporting "strong mayor" would settle the matter for me. Since
I already knew where I stood, Laney's declaration is like waving a red cape at a
steer who was already agitated.
This is as close
to a coup d'?at as we have seen in Dallas.
 |
Group pushes to give mayor more power:
Lawyer: Dallas business group wants insight on amending city charter
Wednesday,
July 21, 2004 By DAVE LEVINTHAL / The
Dallas Morning News |
... David Laney, a Dallas lawyer and former
chairman of the city's Charter Review Commission, confirmed that
businesspeople have asked him to research how
to best conduct a referendum ? presumably in May 2005 ? to amend the city
charter to create a stronger mayor.
"There's clearly some interest," Mr.
Laney said. "I just don't know how broad or deep this runs."
...
While Ms. Miller said she was not involved in the referendum
effort, she reiterated her support for strengthening the mayor's office.
"The citizens
want the change. The only citywide elected official should have the ability
to implement his or her vision that he or she was elected on," Ms. Miller
said by phone while vacationing in California. "So often now, it's such a
stalemate."
The mayor said she supports a
change in mayoral powers that would take effect immediately after passage or
at the end of her term in 2007.
... In 2003, the Charter Review Commission
recommended maintaining the city manager/city council style of government.
... John Cappello, president of the West Dallas
Chamber of Commerce. "If they could put money behind a strong mayor, they'll
have more control over that mayor, more power. It would really open the city
up to special interests."
... Mayor Pro Tem John Loza said, the issue
of creating a more powerful mayor is worth debate. He supports the idea, he
said, and thinks a majority of residents might, too. |
Stepford Laura Miller is estranged from
"the citizens" and does not know what we want. She has been
programmed by
Our Downtown Betters to see things through ODB eyes, which means she sees
her ODB friends as "the citizens" and she sees you and me (taxpayers) as the "serf class"
who are supposed to stay in our place, pay our taxes and watch our superiors
waste our money and ruin our city.
Our Mayor promised the council if they would support changing to "strong mayor"
that she would support having it not go into effect until 2007. Her
promise did not sway her colleagues. With the ODB planning to take this
away from the council, she is not bound by that 2007 date. If the ODB's
referendum were to pass, she could be Queen as early as June, 2005.
This referendum is dead in the water from the get go. The ODB have no idea
how hard it will be to get 59,000 signatures. Granted, it is more
efficient to do your petition drive during an election when most people have
their voter registration card available, and you can be pretty sure you are
talking to registered voters. However, you must have people willing to
stand at the polls collecting those signatures like the cops and firefighters
did to get their referendum on the ballot.
This is going to be a hot election in November. Kathy Neely and Joe
Thug May will be busy harvesting votes for various congressional and state
campaigns, so their thugs will not be able
to waste time standing in front of voting places trying to explain the
issue to voters. They will be filling in the ballots they have coerced or
stolen from old people (some comatose in nursing homes). The thugs who work for Neely and May do not expose
themselves in public places too often, particularly in the light of day.
To make it more difficult for Our Mayor and the ODB to get their way, Councilman
James Fantroy told Heinbaugh he would fight it all the way to filing
a federal lawsuit. The ODB might be able to buy off Old Al Lipscomb, but
Fantroy has been too vocal against this to back down.
Oh, My God! I'm going to be on the same side as as James Fantroy! I
guess having John Send Me Some Money Loza backing Our Mayor and the ODB balances
the matter.
SMSM Loza has said he will run for Mayor or County Commissioner after he goes
off council next year (term limited).
Commissioner John Wiley Price is surely quaking in his boots at the thought of a
primary contest with Loza. Is there anyone retiring from this council next
May who is not running for Mayor?
There are many reasons to keep our city manager system. Like having a
professional run our city rather than a temporary politician.
This is a three-prong threat.
As soon as we went to a strong mayor system,
the same ODB forces will start pushing to end term limits so they can keep their
puppets in office. With our
gerrymandered districts drawn by Mad Max Aaronson and Joe Thug May, the only
chance we have of ever getting rid of these flakes are term limits.
With the end of term limits,
they will start agitating for pay raises for council members so the ODB won't
have to fund their puppets so heavily and Joe Taxpayer will be forced to make up
the difference.
Please don't think this will be an open, honest debate if the ODB get their
59,000 signatures. They control what gets printed in Belo's
Dallas Managed News.
They already have Park Cities resident Wicked Allyson on their team (he's such
an ODB wanabee), so D Magazine
will promote "strong mayor". None of the local talk jocks on the major
stations have been here long enough to understand the issue. Those who
have been here more than 5 or 6 years live outside of Dallas. They will
get on board because they don't respect Dallas anyway.
It's going to be tough for Our Stepford Mayor to focus on two referendums at the
same time: the Jonestown sales tax and the charter change to strong mayor.
Both issues will give people who are really mad at her for betraying us a chance
to let her know at the polls how we feel. We won't have to wait until
2007, or earlier (if she resigns to run for higher office) to express our
displeasure.
Laura Miller knew our form of government when she ran for Mayor. Laura
Miller knew our budget woes (3 years on the council) when she asked for and got
endorsements and support from Dallas cops and firefighters, and then a month
later betrayed them. Laura Miller doesn't know she has lost her base in
this city.
This latest ODB/Miller trick will be the catalyst that pulls divergent groups
together to Just Say No to Laura Miller, Jerry Jones and the entire ODB
apparatus.
sb
| |

|