|
Tim Dickey Don Abbott
| |
07/08/04 A Bad Deal that keeps on
taking, but the tourists are taking a walk.
Way back in 1998, when Ron Kirk sold the big lie and
Kathy Neely stole all those votes AFTER the It's a Bad Deal!! campaign warned
Dallas voters of the consequences of a YES vote, a wheel was set in motion that
is still rolling downhill and crushing everything in its path.
That arena sales tax that passed by less than 1% has just about destroyed our
convention business, which was really the only tourist draw Dallas has ever had
-- unless you want to see where President Kennedy was killed.
Unfortunately for rich old Grandpa Jones, the impact of what Ron Kirk and former
City Mgr. John Ware did to Dallas taxpayers and our convention business has come
to a hard fruition at a very bad time for him to be asking Dallas County voters
to get stupid again. Add the bad timing to the fact that it is one of the
most unpopular men in Dallas (or the Park Cities) asking us build him a place to
do his business, and it looks pretty bleak for the Jones Gang.
Still, there is something about our local Robber Barons (millionaires or
billionaires) that gives them the chutzpah to ignore reality and convince (or
buy) voters to give them money that should be spent on our basic needs.
We cannot pay our police and firefighters what they could make in Grand Prairie.
We have not given our civilian employees a raise in 3 years. We have laid
off hundreds of city employees who were doing things we needed done to maintain
even a minimum standard of quality of life. With all that, our Interim
City Manager has assigned 8 or 9 high level staff people to paving the way for
Grandpa Jones to get his Fair Park stadium at the expense of God knows what
should have been done first.
 |
Panel eyes Fair Park stadium
City officials say they want to be ready for Cowboys' return
Wednesday, July 7, 2004 By EMILY RAMSHAW
/ The Dallas Morning News |
Since suspending stadium negotiations
with the county, the Dallas Cowboys have made no overtures to City Hall. But
city officials expect them to.
They've organized a fact-finding committee
to investigate the logistics of a Fair Park stadium so they're prepared when
the team comes knocking.
"It's a contingency plan," said Jim
Wood, director of street services and chairman of the committee.
... comprised of nine employees from seven
city departments ? is to anticipate questions that might arise with any big
development project at Fair Park. This includes, but is not limited to, a
new stadium,
... Mr. Wood said committee members were pulled
off their jobs two weeks ago to focus on a Fair Park stadium.
... "Obviously, we're doing all this work with the
end goal of having a stadium built in Fair Park," he said. "That's our
desire ? to bring the Cowboys to Dallas."
... While a new Cowboys stadium in Fair Park
would do great things for South Dallas, Mr. Wood said, there's no question
it would put added strain on existing infrastructure.
He said some streets might not be
wide enough, and traffic patterns could be affected on the Interstate 30
interchange. It's still unclear whether power lines and water and wastewater
pipes could handle an additional 80,000 visitors on game days, he said,
particularly when some of those games occur during the State Fair of Texas.
"Infrastructure is a big part of any
stadium cost, so we'll be considering different ways to finance the
project," he said. ... |
Ms. Ramshaw is certainly doing
some serious reporting. If she keeps up this good work, she will get sent
to Plano or assigned to cover Austin or D.C. She's turning up all sorts of
bad pennies, and Mayor Decherd cannot be pleased.
 |
Without signed deals, Convention Center not sure who will show up
7/6/04
by EMILY RAMSHAW &
SUZANNE MARTA / The Dallas Morning News |
During the next six months, the Dallas
Convention Center anticipates a full house ? at least 10 major shows
bringing more than 160,000 guests and an estimated $283 million in economic
impact.
But for 70 percent of those events,
some as early as next month, the center has no signed contracts ? and no
legal recourse if client groups decide to take their dollars elsewhere.
Convention Center officials blame a
strong buyers' market. It's hard to put pressure on clients, they say, when
groups aren't lining up to use Dallas' facilities.
... "Other cities come and woo [groups] away
because we have no contract with them," Dallas Mayor Laura Miller said.
"Then we're left with empty hotels, empty restaurants and no tourism."
... While a few convention hot spots, such as
Chicago, Las Vegas and New Orleans, can afford to require a hefty deposit or
cancellation fee before a contract is signed, "most cities in America can't
get away with that," said Tom Noonan, senior vice president of convention
sales and service for the Dallas Convention & Visitors Bureau. "Certainly
not Dallas."
... 2 ? years ago when Irving-based
Promotional Products Association International announced it was moving its
convention to Las Vegas after more than two decades in Dallas. The group
drew about 18,000 delegates to its five-day annual event and about $29
million in economic impact.
... Last year, the American Rental Association
canceled its booking for 2005 so it could move its annual event to Las
Vegas.
... earlier this year, Addison-based Mary
Kay warned the city that it would cancel some of its smaller Dallas meetings
if the hotel occupancy tax were raised to fund a new Cowboys stadium.
... This summer alone, Mary Kay's five-week beauty
consultant seminars are expected to have an economic impact of nearly $100
million.
... A spokesman for the city-operated Los
Angeles Convention Center said it is "pretty unusual" not to have a contract
signed six months out. And at the Massachusetts Convention Center Authority,
the rule of thumb is to have them a year out.
... Mr. Noonan said the Dallas Convention Center
is overburdened and understaffed and faces bureaucratic holdups as contracts
are shuttled among customers, city attorneys and convention staff.
... As recently as 2002, council members shelved a
proposal to look into privatizing the center.
... Ms. Miller said. "We need to look at
privatizing the Convention Center very shortly." |
Although our failing convention
business is very bad for the city and for those of who actually pay property
taxes in this town, the Hotel Association of Greater Dallas
supported the arena sales tax in
exchange for an expanded Convention Center and brought their dilemma on
themselves.
It's a Bad Deal!! warned them the sales tax would be detrimental to our
convention business, which kept their rooms booked. Dallas does not have
the amenities of cities like Chicago, Las Vegas or New Orleans, but our sales
tax on hotel/motel rooms and car rentals is higher than any of those three
cities. We used to have cheap rooms and car rentals, which compensated for
tourists having little or nothing to do once they got here -- except for dining
in our fancy restaurants and shopping in our endless malls (which also added to
our sales tax revenue).
Now, we don't get the big conventions or big dollars the attendees spent when
they were in town, but we have a big arena with no meaningful development around
it. Oh, yeah -- they're building another office tower and another hotel to
add to our glut of empty office space and empty hotel rooms.
Here's another insightful Emily Ramshaw story. She seems to really get it,
so she can't be a welcomed sight in Our Stepford Mayor's office..
 |
City
fireworks show: D stood for 'dud'
July 7, 2004
By EMILY RAMSHAW / The Dallas Morning News |
Jon Jackson was ready to party. The
salesman had 50 friends crammed into his downtown loft apartment and a great
view of the Dallas skyline.
... Mr. Jackson said. "We couldn't believe
we were seeing such a small fireworks display in one of the best-known
cities in the world."
... From Garland to Irving to Addison,
regional Independence Day events boasted top-of-the-line fireworks and
performing artists and drew record-setting crowds.
Dallas, on the other hand, attracted
only 7,000 guests ? down from 80,000 at last year's Trinity Fest and less
than half the anticipated crowd.
... "Dallas should be the anchor for all these
cities, bringing people into downtown," Mr. Jackson said.
... City Council member Veletta Forsythe Lill said
suburban competition probably factored into Dallas' dwindling numbers.
... Jackson's party wasn't the only one confused. As pops rang
out downtown Saturday, thousands of visitors seated outside City Hall
realized the city-planned concert was no place to view fireworks. In a
stampede of picnic blankets and baskets, many took off running for a better
view, sitting on shoulders and peering among trees. Some gave up and got in
their cars.
"You could hear the noise, and you
could just barely see them over the trees," said Brad Penk, a Garland
resident who works at Lew Sterrett Justice Center. "I know they cut it back
some this year, but it's almost not worth doing if you're not going to do it
right."
... Trinity Fest 2004 was canceled this year
because of a lingering $80,000 debt from last year's bash, held in the
Reunion Arena parking lot. The free replacement event, planned for July 3 at
Crow Park, was moved to City Hall because of flooding in the Trinity River
bottom.
... From now on, Mr. Jackson said, he'll always
know where to find fireworks. After Saturday night's fiasco, he headed to
Irving's Las Colinas show Sunday.
"It was breathtakingly beautiful ?
unbelievable," he said. "It was everything Dallas wasn't. It was a
wonderful, wonderful surprise." |
I live one street south of
Walnut Hill and did not hear a sound Saturday night during the Dallas fireworks
mini-show. When the fireworks started Sunday night in Las Colinas, I could
not believe how loud they were. We have so many trees in my neighborhood,
I couldn't see the fireworks, but the sound was amazing.
Several months ago when City Hall announced a Saturday night event for July 4th
(which was on a Sunday with almost everyone having Monday off), I asked why we
were not having our fireworks show on Sunday night. Does anyone have a
clue why Our Mayor and the council would throw a July 4th party on July 3rd?
Never got a reasonable explanation -- or an unreasonable explanation for that
matter.
It's just more of the same idiocy, and it's getting really tiresome. It's
been tiresome for quite awhile, but now it's getting "really tiresome".
More, it's just plain embarrassing that we not only can't get the big stuff done
right (like reducing our crime rate), but we can't even get a July 4th event
done on the right night.
We used to have wonderful fireworks shows on the 4th in the Cotton Bowl. I
believe Tom Thumb sponsored them and give away tickets with our groceries.
Thousands packed into the Cotton Bowl, and it was so exciting and patriotic.
Of course, that was back when the Cullum family owned Tom Thumb.
Why doesn't Belo Corporation put on a free fireworks show for Dallas citizens?
They have millions to waste. Remember that "cat" scanner fiasco?
Now, they've got that newspaper for short brains that they have to give away.
Surely Belo can afford to waste some of their millions throwing Dallas a July
4th party -- on July 4th.
We can't pay our police officers and firefighters what they could earn in Grand
Prairie. Now, we can't even do a fireworks show as well as Irving or
Garland, where they understand the importance of having a July 4th fireworks
show on July 4th, not July 3rd.
Is that just not God awful?
An interesting editorial in The Dallas Managed
News indicates Belo may be disturbed
that we have lost ranking to San Antonio. It's too long to cite
effectively, so just use the link to read it for yourself -- and come right
back.
 |
Sizing Up the Alpha-Male City
Is relative size important? Not if you ask a Californian.
July 7, 2004
By RUBEN NAVARRETTE / The Dallas Morning News |
|
San Antonio has eclipsed Dallas as the nation's
eighth-largest city. According to estimates released recently by the Census
Bureau, San Antonio had ? as of July 1, 2003 ? about 1,214,725 residents
compared to Dallas' 1,208,318. How humiliating. Or is it?
... |
What bothers me about the cute
exchange between Ruben Navarrette and Victoria
Loe Hicks is that they both are from somewhere
else. Is Hank Tatum the only local left on the
DMN
Editorial Board?
When Dallas people were running this city, things worked. We actually had
our streets swept by big machines with water and brushes.
I sent this e-mail to Ruben Navarrette:
The reason people like San Antonio is
because it embraces its Texas heritage. Dallas
tries to be a copy of other cities. San Antonio leaders
are local and aren't trying to turn their city into the place they
left.
The reason Ft. Worth is growing and gets all kinds of accolades is the same
reason for San Antonio's success. Ft. Worth leaders promote their
Texas heritage. More importantly, Ft. Worth
wealthy families give to their city. Dallas
wealthy families compete to see how much they can take from Dallas
taxpayers.
It's not alpha-male. It's whether a city's
leaders respect that city's history and character
or whether they want the city to look like some place
they chose to leave. |
Our Mayor is from Connecticut
and three councilwomen are from Illinois. Our only daily newspaper is
dominated by people who aren't even Texans, much less Dallas natives.
We have lost our way, and we are not going to find it until someone has the
nerve to face reality.
Dallas is like a classic old car barely sputtering along, but its owner is more
interested in getting it a new paint job than making it run better, so it can
continue to be a dependable vehicle to get from point A to point B.
Rather than repair or replace the engine, the owner puts in a new sound system.
Rather than replace the worn out tires with a reliable and affordable set, the
owner buys white walls with new, hot spinner hubcaps.
When the poor old engine just quits, the owner is stuck with a useless vehicle
that not only can't get him where he needs to go, it will cost him more money
just to move it out of the way of cars whose owners spent their money more
wisely on stuff that really matters, stuff that keeps their cars running.
Paul Kix of The Dallas Observer
has a follow-up on the city's give-away-to-the-rich program that hardly anyone
knew about (see DallasArena.com's
It's not fair:
Tax rebate to
rich couple to rehab home.)
 |
Home Suh-weet Home
Preserve history, get a tax break?is that a bad deal?
By Paul Kix
dallasobserver.com | originally published: July 8, 2004 |
...
According to the city, everything can be explained. First, an entire
generation of Dallas architecture has lost out to parking garages
and lots downtown and new developments everywhere else, says
Councilwoman Veletta Lill. In 1994, to combat this problem, the city
passed an ordinance that gave tax abatements to historic landmarks.
... Griffith says roughly 200
buildings and homes in Dallas have received the city's money through
this program in the past 10 years.
When asked how much money in
abatements residential homes received per year--and how many
residents received the money--Griffith said the city's planning
department would have those figures. But the planning department
didn't have the numbers, saying it would take an open records
request to get the answer. As of press time, the Dallas Observer has
heard no response.
Lill, however, says the
city annually hands out $700,000 in tax
abatements.
... "it's not at all uncommon" for
residential properties to get the abatements, Lill says. "It's an
incentive to preserve our history." ... |
|
|
It ticked me off last week when
Princess Velveeta threw out her $700,000 figure of similar tax abatements
granted, but I thought she meant over the 10 years the ordinance has been in
effect. If we've been granting $700,000 annually in tax abatements for 10
years, that's $7 million.
$7 million's pretty close to what we need to balance next year's budget -- even
with a tax increase on you and me.
My mortgage company and I own a 50 year old house on which I spent a lot of
money restoring. My neighbors tell me its last residents were selling
drugs here and at least three families lived in the house at the same time.
They lost the house in foreclosure, and apparently the authorities found them
from all the solicitations from criminal lawyers that came in the mail after I
bought the house.
My spending way too much of my disposable income to restore my home to
respectability has been very good for my neighborhood and certainly helped
stabilize the street.
The house is a "classic" 50's rectangle structure with the entry hall in the
center, dining room and den/kitchen on the left and 3 bedrooms and baths on the
right. My parents built the same style house in Lewisville a year before
my house was built in North Dallas in 1957. It may not meet Princess
Velveeta's standards of historical significance, but it is a classic of it's
time and style and important to me.
Where's my tax abatement for all the money I've spent on my home?
Who knows? My house might be a tourist attraction someday, as the site
where DallasArena.com was published. It's as likely that someone will make
the trip to Dallas to see my 1957 classic rectangle house as the tourists Our
Stepford Mayor promises will come to see her String Thing Bridges.
Speaking of tourists, where are the mobs who were supposed to be booking hotel
rooms and renting cars to attend events at the Hicks/Perot Arena? They
might be waiting so they can take in Jonestown and the Hicks/Perot Arena in one
trip.
Or, possibly all our missing tourists are touring cities that actually have
something unique to see -- something that makes that city the place it is.
There are things in Dallas worth noting, but no one at City Hall takes notice or
care of them. We have a great Zoo with wonderful critters that the Park
Board does not adequately fund or promote, but still lots of people get there
every day.
We have the Arboretum and White Rock Lake. We have Bachman Lake (which
Councilman Steve Salazar is giving more attention than we have had from City
Hall in a long time).
We have historic homes in East Dallas and Lakewood where crowds actually do
flock when home tours are available. We have Old City Park, but who wants
to go there when the area is ravaged by street bums?
If you haven't driven through Kessler Park or Stevens Park, particularly at
Christmas, you haven't seen the most beautiful part of Dallas -- great homes,
great geography.
I can't even get started on Fair Park and all it could do for Dallas tourism
with or without a new stadium if City Hall would just maintain it properly.
Rather than focus on what we've got, Our Downtown Betters and their Girl
Downtown can't take their eyes off what other cities have.
Just because an outfit looks good on a model does not mean it is something you
should buy for yourself. If you don't have your own image, no one will
notice you -- particularly if several others in the room are wearing the same
designer outfit you paid too much money for.
People used to come to Dallas to visit and live because we took care of our
city. We kept things clean. We kept things repaired. We had a
sense of pride in our city just as it was because it was good to live here.
It was affordable, it was comfortable and it was Dallas.
When a city has to go in search of a slogan and comes up with "Live Large", it's
not hard to see why the tourists are searching elsewhere for an interesting
place to visit and spend their money.
sb
| |

|