|
Brandon Rodriguez Kevin Fries
| |
06/14/04 Defying common sense may not
work anymore.
It makes no sense to give $42.50 dollars, much less $425
Million to a
billionaire. It makes no sense to build 3 String Thing Bridges over
a sewer trough, when they each will cost millions more than a perfectly good
bridge to get you from here to there (in a hurry to avoid the smell). It makes no sense to erect glass
buildings in Dallas, when we have Summers that can make visitors think they've
had a religious experience and want to get right with the Lord as soon as they
get home.
How can something that looks like the rejected glass boxes of the 70's be
applauded in 2004? Are we in some kind of revival of failed ideas?
It probably is much higher now, but a few years ago a former councilman told me that
all the glass and direction the Meyerson's glass wall faces are the reason it
costs us over $3 million a year to maintain the interior of the concert hall.
The paper thin, layered wood which creates the wonderful acoustics of the
Meyerson must be kept below a certain temperature or they separate and peel.
Having walls of glass face into a Southern Dallas Sun was something only someone
who had never been in Dallas between May and October would have done.
That's not $3 Million a year flat expense -- it's after all costs are applied
against revenue. The Meyerson has never been profitable, but a $3 Million
annual shortfall out of our budget is something to consider.
You don't build an igloo outside Alaska. You don't build a facility
designed for a cool climate in Dallas.
 |
Designs applauded, booed
Plans for center called innovative by some,
impractical by others
June 10,
2004 By TOM SIME / The Dallas Morning
News |
The
unveiling of preliminary designs for the two major venues of the Dallas
Center for the Performing Arts has drawn enthusiasm from the organizations
that will perform there and some puzzlement from the public.
... Architect Brooks Howell of Houston, who
attended Tuesday's event, was more cautious.
... Debbie Higgins of Dallas was more harsh.
"Frankly, the opera house looks like it belongs at Disney World," she wrote
in an e-mail. "And the theater is one of the ugliest buildings I've ever
seen."
... Community activist Sharon Boyd said the
buildings aren't suited to the climate. "We need to
require any architect doing a major building in Dallas to spend
a summer here," she said by e-mail. "They would
then use less glass on the building and less cement on the ground."
Mr. Howell agreed that the operable
glass windows of the Winspear Opera House, "while appropriate in Northern
California, [are] not particularly practical in Dallas."
... |
| |
| |
James Northrup:
New opera house was designed by a Dutchman. It's an appropriate
design for a cool, cloudy climate like the Netherlands. The movable wall
partitions are a direct rip-off of the Glimmerglass Opera House on
Otsego Lake, New York - a cool, cloudy climate with a view.
Next to Woodall Rogers, it'll be one noisy
solar collector.
The new opera house will be a
brilliant addition to the cityscape, but it needs
a parasol over it.
The acoustically correct horseshoe
shape is spotlit in red; an appropriate color, since the glass curtain
wall around it will serve as a very effective solar oven.
All out-of-town architects
who do major Dallas projects, particularly
Englishmen, need to spend an August here before starting to sketch. The
movable curtain wall was a good idea for the
Glimmerglass Opera House overlooking Otsego Lake
in upstate New York.
Next to Woodall Rogers, it would only
be opened to let out the steam. I'm all for it,
just so the City does not get stuck with the
electrical bill. |
|
|
But, of course, we will.
Add the annual cost of maintaining the Meyerson to the the millions it
will cost to maintain these two these two buildings designed for non-Dallas
climates not to mention the $3 million (optimistically) projected annual cost of
maintaining artificial lakes in a sewer trough, and you are talking about over $12 Million out of our annual budget
to provide entertainment, mostly for the city's elite.
I remember taking a
relative to a July 4th concert at the Meyerson. She said everyone in her
office was really excited for her because none of them had ever been in the
building, much less attended an event there. Most Dallas taxpayers have
only been in the Meyerson a few times for a paid event, if at all.
Actually, most Dallas taxpayers have never been to the Meyerson. It wasn't
designed for the masses.
The Opera Hall will be even
more elitist than the Meyerson. It doesn't matter if 92% of the cost are
privately funded. Bass Hall in Ft. Worth was 100% privately funded.
Even if you still believe what you read in
The Dallas Managed News,
8% of the cost of a building that was not designed for Dallas summers or to be
adjacent Woodall Rogers is more than we can afford when we are facing a $14 Million shortfall in our
budget for 2005. Council members are already talking about raising our property
taxes, but that does not mean our basic needs will be any better served than in
2004.
See what happens when you vote for a bloated bond election?
An opera hall or a performance hall is not a necessity to Joe Taxpayer's quality
of life. When was the last time, Cinemark asked Joe Taxpayer to pay for
their place of business? A lot more taxpayers attend a movie than an
opera.
Despite what the elite and water carriers like Princess Velveeta on the City
Council claim, it is not essential to my life for my tax dollars to be squandered
providing entertainment for Park Cities millionaires in the guise of art and
culture. As rich as are the coffers in University Park and Highland Park, their
residents spend their money convincing Dallas voters to spend a lot more of our
money to build stuff we don't need that only Our Downtown Betters (the ODB) and
the elite can afford to use.
It's the same issue with Our Mayor's obsession with her String Thing Bridges.
Spending millions to erect monstrous bridges over a sludge pit that occasionally
looks like a river is nonsense.
With these extravagances
the costs just go on and on. Now, Our Mayor will be lobbying for
the Public Utilities Commission to allow TXU to hit you and me with a surcharge
to raise $100 Million to bury utility lines in the Trinity Corridor because:
 |
Council's $100 million dream: providing
electricity without view
Wednesday, May 26, 2004
By EMILY RAMSHAW / The Dallas Morning News |
...
And the mayor said she would do what it takes to
remove existing electric eyesores in coming years ? even if it means the
city paying millions of dollars to bury the lines.
... "Why would you
build the [Woodall Rodgers Signature] bridge and have it obscured?" Ms.
Miller said. "If we have to pay to put them underground, that's what we're
going to do." |
Discussed in more detail in
Memorial Day
Reminiscences of Councilwoman Miller.
But, why would you build a String Thing Bridge over a sewer trough in the first
place?
It looks like the ODB's new dreams for wasting our money, rather than leaving it
in our bank accounts to be spent on things we actually need and want, may be
going up in Trinity fumes.
 |
The Span of Public Works: Artful design, burning
bridges, silly games
Editorial Page
12:04 AM CDT on Sunday, June 13, 2004
|
... Performing Arts Center designs ...
Good
Calatrava bridges (stalled by congressional impasse) ...
Bad
Cowboys stadium negotiations ... U-u-u-u-u-g-l-y
... If they do what they're meant to do, the Arts
District should become a much livelier and more inviting place, a place to
stroll and sit and eat, as well as a place to imbibe art.
... By contrast, though it pains us to say it, the
Cowboys look downright unsporting. They want the public to pony up
two-thirds of a new stadium's $654 million cost, but they scuttled talks
with Dallas County rather than disclose financial information against which
county commissioners could judge the merits of their proposal.
... Given that the city owns Fair Park, the
Cowboys probably should have been dealing with the city rather than the
county, anyway ? and, with all due respect to the second teams, that
ultimately means Laura Miller and Jerry Jones.
... Now for the Calatravas: ...
Dallas is already assured of one Calatrava-designed bridge, the
extension of Woodall Rodgers Freeway. (Thanks, again, largely to private
donors.) ... The prospect of two additional
Calatravas, on Interstates 30 and 35, is dimming because Congress can't seem
to pass a transportation bill ?
... Above all, we mustn't let any interim disappointment daunt our
determination to seize the ultimate prize.
|
Of course, the "ultimate prize"
is how do we waste as much of Joe Taxpayer's tax money as possible on the most
expensive, impractical project or structure possible?
One piece of good news is the frantic coverage we are getting from
The Dallas Managed News
these days. If things were going swimmingly, they would not be so frantic
in their editorials and so rah! rah! in their reporting. It doesn't really
matter whether it's on the editorial page or in the so called news section.
The message is all controlled by Bob Decherd.
Another piece of good news is Our Mayor's silence in this stadium mess. If
the
The Dallas Managed News
is having to publicly encourage her to get cracking,
she must be showing some resistance. Is Councilwoman Miller rearing her
populist values and influencing Mayor Miller?
Or is Our Mayor is too focused on her Trinity Project and her String Thing
Bridges to be bothered with the travails of Grandpa Jones and his quest to be
the No. 1 Robber Baron of the Metroplex?
Even though she's done so much damage with her obsession with the Trinity
Project and her String Thing Bridges, let's give Our Mayor the benefit of the
doubt on Jonestown.
sb
| |

|