|
| |
03/26/04 Letter to Dallas County Commissioners
To: Judge Margaret Keliher
Commissioner Jim Jackson
Date: 3-25-2004
SUBJECT: New Stadium "Economic Impact" --- Debate Required
RE: Dallas Morning News:
Cowboys promise jobs from new stadium
by Dave Michaels (3/24/04)
Hello County Officials:
It is imperative that you respond to the completely
absurd remarks made by some "Rob" guy who represents
the Cowboy organization. His data base is
certainly way off from that of Mr. Zimbalist and
countless other recognized experts who realize the true outcome of the
in-process stadium folly.
The economic impact "Rob" discusses is a pure pipe
dream. He does not even define the location for the proposed
stadium prior to spouting his numbers. Has he studied the disastrous
Houston situation? Are his numbers "over and above" those revenue
estimates that are already being derived from the current
UT-OU games, existing Cowboy
events and an imaginary Super Bowl event that may
or may not ever transpire in Dallas, Irving or wherever?
Is he factoring in the loss
of convention business in his numbers?
Let's face it. Without a location defined, there is no acceptable
environmental, traffic, economic or other study that "Mr. Rob" can
truthfully pass along to the Dallas County taxpayer. All his made up
"blather" reminds me of the same type of jargon used to propagate the
2012 Olympic package for the Dallas area (page upon page of blatant
misrepresentations) which were recognized by the USOC early in the
process.
Additionally --- look at the deterioration and lack of
maintenance at the Cotton Bowl, Texas Stadium, Reunion
Arena, the Dallas Zoo, and on and on. Just what
entity is going to maintain the new "Jerryville"? Who
is going to pay for that? Will that be contained in
ANOTHER bond package?
Prior to the County entering into something that will lead to a
cumbersome tax on Dallas residents and loss of convention
and other business, a good debate is in order. Prior
to the debate, I suggest someone define just WHERE
THIS JERRYVILLE monstrosity is to be situated.
Also... all the formal environmental, traffic, economic
impact studies (accurate) must be placed on the table, and not covertly
hidden in an attorney's briefcase.
REMEMBER --- concurrent events within the site area
will all contribute to the results of impact studies
discussed and required above. I am informed that not a shovel
of dirt will fly on the project, election or no election, until the EPA
approves certain studies which affect the region. With that in mind, I
would watch the process very carefully. Why spend thousands of dollars
on an election to find out that the state or federal government may
halt the project?
Regards,
Rad Field
| |

|