|
Golden Goose
| |
04/20/05 The Star of Dallas
Shines.
 |
|
On this great day in Texas,
I ask all forward thinking, progressive citizens of
Dallas to praise the alternative charter proposal approved
last week by the Dallas City Council.
On all accounts, the alternative proposal demonstrates true leadership and a
strong desire to meet the evolving needs of the city of Dallas.
|
|
Judd Bradbury |
|
The challenging issues surrounding mayoral
authority and city council oversight have been addressed in the
council's proposal without dismantling and stagnating
the Dallas governmental system.
A large number of local government scholars suggest that the golden rule of
local government is not the Mayor-Council system or the Council-Manager system.
Most scholars recommend a hybrid blend of the
two. Given the information contained in the
attached article, I believe the Dallas City Council has been wise to maintain
the general underpinning of a Council-Manager system with new mayoral powers and
better oversight for the city council. See Golden
Goose
Some in the media suggest that
the new proposal is somehow flawed because the city council has maintained the
ability to remove the chief administrative officer with a simple majority.
Every constitutional scholar will tell you that
these types of checks and balances are the true genius of the American
Constitution. If you want accountability,
you sure get it under the alternative charter proposal. The
mayor and the city council will both be able to keep the chief administrative
officer on their toes.
The main complaint of Proposition-1 proponents has been a lack of accountability
on the part of the city manager. It
is a
little inconsistent to critique the city council charter proposal for being ?too
accountable? when the main thrust of the previous critique was a lack of
accountability.
Proposition
1: Council alternative is a step backward
(Dallas Morning
News, 4/19/05)
The changes contained in the
council's alternative charter proposal are consistent
with the universal approach used to manage our largest corporations.
If anyone doubts that a corporate board of
directors can fire an executive officer, I would encourage them to put in a call
to the former officers of Enron, World-com, Tyco, Boeing or Global Crossing.
Corporate executives always serve more than one master, usually about a dozen of
them.
The city of Dallas is a governmental institution that needs an executive and a
legislative branch. The Dallas City Council has come through with shining colors
delivering new and improved versions of both. For that I am very grateful.
| |

|