|
Citizen D
| |
01/04/05 Our Mayor is supporting Bah!
Bah!'s Coup d'?/font>tat!
Only someone who doesn't know me would call me
gullible and way too trusting, but I don't think the most naive person in town
is going to buy Our Mayor's act of a sudden conversion that forces her to
support the Park Cities Cabal's plan to take control over Dallas government.
 |
|
Our Mayor has been doing a little "now you see it, now you don't" dance with the
local media and former supporters regarding her plans to support Bah! Bah!'s
strong-arm mayor "referendum". She has been pretending not to be in the
middle of the Park Cities plot from the get go, but as of Monday, January 3,
2005, Our Mayor has officially turned her back on Dallas residents and cast her
lot with people who prefer to live in the Park Cities and do their business in
Dallas. |
Several of Our Mayor's Park Cities Cabal have big
stakes in Downtown real estate, and almost all of them have big stakes in Our
Mayor, having served on her Finance Committee.
Several reporters have been insisting Our Mayor had not definitely committed to
support the Park Cities plan to reduce Dallas residents to serfs and the city
council to tree stumps. They must not have been at last month's debate
between Deputy Mayor Pro Tem Don Hill and Our Mayor. She was absolutely
debating in favor of Bah! Bah!'s plan, and she was totally aware she did not
have the support of the audience because she became increasingly frantic to win
us over.
In Our Mayor's spirit of game playing, let's pretend we buy it that she just decided
Monday what she to do about Bah! Bah!'s plan.
 |
Miller backs strong-mayor vote;
Mayor considers own fund-raising effort
Monday,
January 3, 2005
By DAVE LEVINTHAL / The Dallas Morning News |
After weeks of maybes and probablys,
Mayor Laura Miller said Monday that she would support a May referendum on
whether to do away with Dallas' city manager form of government in favor of
a more powerful, executive-style mayor. ... she's
considering forming her own strong-mayor campaign and fund-raising effort.
... After Ms. Miller's council colleagues rebuffed
her, Dallas lawyer Beth Ann Blackwood submitted more than 30,000 residents'
signatures on behalf of an even more sweeping strong-mayor ballot petition.
... Ms. Miller said. "But I think the issue
is that people are hungry for change. People
are ready for a strong-mayor form of government. And how much worse could it
be? We don't even deliver effective city services."
... Ms. Blackwood said Monday that she was unaware
of the mayor's support or her potential interest in a parallel support
campaign. ... "I'm pleased to see the
mayor is for more accountability at City Hall. I really had no idea what she
was going to do," Ms. Blackwood said.
... Council member James Fantroy, who
supports retaining the council-manager form of government, pledged to launch
an anti-strong-mayor campaign.
Using his own money, Mr. Fantroy said
he plans to purchase 100 billboards worth of advertising space and set up
phone banks in hopes of thwarting the strong-mayor effort.
"If you're going to try to take power
from me, I have the right to use my resources to fight this," Mr. Fantroy
said. "This is one of the most critical elections in the history of Dallas
elections, ...
Asked if she's worried about
alienating supporters who happen to oppose a strong-mayor form of
government, Ms. Miller said that's doubtful.
... "Apparently then, she's forgot the
people who elected her who wanted change, but not by coup d'etat. We don't
want a dictatorship," said Mr. Adelman, who operates the Web site
strongarmmayor.com. "You're going to see a very unusual mixing of people who
don't usually work together coming together to oppose this."
|
Do you know anyone who is
"hungry for change" from our city manager system to a strong-arm mayor system?
I mean anyone who lives in Dallas? Do you know anyone who even favors a strong mayor system? So, who are the
"people" Our Mayor claims are "hungry for change"? Most of her best
friends and financial backers don't live in our city.
 |
|
Anyone who stays in Our Mayor's "inner circle" must agree with her on
everything. If you disagree, you are to keep all negative thoughts to
yourself. To be a "friend" to Laura Miller (if you're not a rich big
shot), you must hear no evil, speak no evil and see no evil.
Constructive criticism is only allowed if you own lots of real estate (or
inherited big bucks). |
Our Mayor's deception in this farce
makes me angry, but I am
absolutely outraged that a bunch of Park Cities fat cats have taken it upon
themselves to change with our city government. Park Cities Bimbo Bah!
Bah! Blackwood and her husband are merely the front guys because I guarantee you
this entire scheme was hatched in a fancy living room on Beverly -- from the
start.
From reporters to political groupies, no one who knows anything about Dallas
politics believes several members of Laura Miller's Finance Committee organized
this Park Cities Cabal and kept it from her. No one who knows Laura Miller
believes all this could have happened without her input.
Laura Miller is a control freak. Being one myself, I certainly
recognize the condition in others. The thing that makes me
absolutely sure this was Our Mayor's plan from the get go is that all the
members of her Park Cities Cabal are rich guys. Outside of her husband and
herself, the only people whose opinions matter to Laura Miller are rich guys.
If you are not rich, Laura can find you useful, but you are supposed to stay in
your place and your opinion means little or nothing to her.
If a pack of
rich Park Cities white dudes announced to Our Mayor they want to take
control of Dallas City Hall, she would likely accept their decision without much
of a fuss and adopt it as her own.
 |
|
Avi Adelman has designed a clever logo for the
opposition that really is perfect. He is organizing one group in
opposition, but a group of Downtown businessmen are also coming together to
oppose the Mayor's strong-arm plans.
I personally know of several individuals who previously played key roles in
Laura Miller's successful political campaigns who are not only opposing her
in this fight, but will not support her in the future. Several
potential candidates are organizing campaigns to go against her in 2007. |
Our Mayor has an immature need to be "liked" by the council. She wants
them to do what she wants because they like her. Problem is, they
don't like her.
Our Mayor doesn't have the will to use the powers she already has -- powers
that were very effective for Con Jerk/Ron Kirk.
So, what's a girl to do?
If she can't make the council like her (much less love her) and she won't punish
them by yanking their council committee appointments and/or chair or vice-chair
positions (they might like her even less), the only thing left is to have her Park Cities benefactors buy
her a new system of government where she can do whatever she wants (or she can
do whatever her Park Cities benefactors want her to want).
I would have supported a charter amendment that gives more power to the Mayor,
but not now and certainly not this plan. We don't need to do away with the
City Manager. We just need to make it a little easier to hire and fire him
or her. Rather than let the Mayor exclusively hire and fire the CM, it
should be a joint decision of the
Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem
with a 2/3rds override by the rest of the council. Since the Mayor is
elected at large by all of us WHO LIVE IN DALLAS, and the council pick the Mayor
Pro Tem and Deputy Mayor Pro Tem, the council would still have a say, but a bad
CM could be sent packing when necessary.
The hard part of all this is that I genuinely care about Laura Miller, at least
the Laura Miller we used to know. I hate it that she's gone South on us.
I hate it more that there's nothing I or any of her former supporters can say or
do to reach her and get her back on track. She is lost to us, and that's
all there is to it.
Laura and the Park Cities Cabal planned to turn this strong-arm mayor fight into a
black/white
contest. It was to be a fight between pretty white lady Laura and
mean old black man James Fantroy (and hopefully Maxine Thornton-Reese).
They were not banking on most of Laura's former supporters opposing her, nor a group of business men fighting to keep our city manager system.
What Laura and her Cabal don't understand is that
people of all color in this city don't want to be serfs to a bunch of
Park Cities landed gentry (most of whom have dubious business backgrounds).
Unlike Our Mayor, I do not equate a person's worth with his
wealth. I certainly do not equate a person's residency in the Park
Cities with a level of intellect that makes him superior to me or any other
RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF DALLAS. |
|
|
Bob Hosea:
A slight change, and we have a
different (?) scenario. Dallas is looking at people from UP
and HP ruling Dallas. The typical citizenry has
not figured it out.
How about us in Oak Cliff having
Dallas rule us since the days when Cedar Springs
and Oak Cliff each lost the election for county seat
(back in 190* something)? Harumph#$@*.
Reminds me of
Medieval times 'Right Of Kings'
mentality.
Either way, they think God endowed
them with the right and wisdom to rule. So, why
should they humble themselves to admit they are fallible?
Even the Pope is infallible only within a limited realm.
|
|
If you really want to
understand Dallas, get a copy of
Big D, Triumphs and Troubles of an American
Supercity in the 20th Century (Revised Edition),
by Darwin Payne. This book has so much information and history. On
page 244, Dr. Payne writes about "A Move to Annex the Park Cities":
... Highland Park and University Park, the two exclusive
incorporated suburbs north of the city, had been urged to become a part of
Dallas proper as far back as 1917. ... [Mayor] Rodgers told the Dallas
Chamber of Commerce: "There is no north Dallas because of the Park
Cities on the north drawing the blood from the heart of Dallas. ..."
... He declared--with some exaggeration--that 90 percent of the city's top
business executives lived in the Park Cities. These executives,
despite their obvious and direct interests in creating a prosperous and
well-governed city, could not even vote in City of Dallas elections.
... While many of Park Cities' influential citizens who were active in
Dallas' affairs favored annexation, the average homeowner did not.
... The News campaigned vigorously for unification in a series of editorials
as well as in "news" stories which clearly were slanted. ... |
The more things change ---
Here we are in 2005, a city of
1,188,204 is about to be annexed by a cabal of tycoons
from two cities with populations totaling 30,000, with the assistance of Our
Mayor. If she has her way, we are about to become the official serfs to
Park Cities residents, but for all practical purposes they have been controlling
us for more than 100 years.
We cannot let these guys take control of our city and reduce Dallas residents to
the serf class of the landed gentry of the Park Cities
When many of us worked so hard to get Laura Miller elected Mayor, we thought she
was one of us. Little did we understand in what low regard she holds us.
I never expected Mayor Miller to do everything I wanted, but I did expect her to
keep her own promises. Our Mayor obviously has spent too much time in the
Bubble. She once said she had a "Big Vision of the little things" that
make life more livable. Now, she's caught up in Big Visions of the Park
Cities that make their life more livable -- Big Vision stuff that we get to pay for.
That Laura Miller is now openly backing Bah! Bah! Blackwood's Strong-Arm Mayor
plan is no surprise. That Laura Miller expects us to believe she was not
in the scam from the beginning is not a surprise either , but it is insulting.
sb
xxx
| |

|