|
|
|
Editor's
note: I am absolutely pro-Wright Amendment and think the compromise
agreement between Dallas, Ft. Worth, American Airlines and Southwest is
reasonable. That said, here's another side of the debate.
08/07/06 Turmoil over Love Field and Regionalism.
I am amazed
there was not this much discussion over the decimation of our downtown and
our businesses as they moved out, upgrading the Cotton Bowl, or the decline
of the neighborhoods around Love Field where I
live.
The decline of
Dallas is in direct proportion to our civic leaders buying into a regional
DFW concept for Dallas in the late 60's.
Civic leaders of Fort Worth knew at the time Dallas had already established itself as the major metro area. Fort Worth power brokers would not let this continue and regionalism became their mantra -- market Fort Worth with Dallas as a metroplex. With regionalism, power shifted from Dallas city hall to the North Texas Council of Governments allowing Fort Worth a say in Dallas politics. That is why our city council is ineffective. Regionalism has led to the dismantling of Dallas as our elected officials allow our best achievements to decline, so they can be re-created in our suburbs creating a conglomeration of cities each competing to be top dog at our expense. Dallas could no longer lead but had to work within a council, other members did not have our best interests at heart.
There is no
more sane re-investment in the city but is spread out usually west to
Arlington/Fort Worth or
north, as long as Dallas does not get it.
Remember Boeing several years ago? They showed them one downtown location; the rest were in the burbs. Keeping Love Field bottled up is very important for this effort. Don't forget AA and Amon Carter. (See fightwright.com) We will eventually loose the State Fair, too.
Dallas is and always has been the more popular destination. It has
always generated business and Love Field was that gateway.
Legislation was the only way
to force a move, not through competition because
Dallas was already the more popular destination.
Holding back Dallas is all the Wright
Amendment was intended to do.
Jim Wright was the Congressman from Fort Worth, and he represented them well, as does Kay Granger now. There is a huge absence of civic leaders who question this concept and what is happening to Dallas. Perhaps Jeb Hensarling has potential.
The Dallas Morning News buys into this. If
you notice, you never see them criticize or
question the regional concept. They praised the latest version of Wright not
as a good business move but as a great show of regional cooperation. They
used fear of noise and safety, as well.
We as a city should take the lead and consolidate power again
in Dallas. We have one
of the most liveable cities in the country, but it is being stifled.
Maybe it is time to re-think regionalism?
Perhaps a vote?
I do see this as a conspiracy and hope this does not sound too crazy. I
thought I could write a letter to the
DMN editor, but
they would not publish it.
Having seen DallasArena.com, I thought I would submit it to you.
Frank
|
|
|