Sharon Boyd, Editor/Publisher

          DallasArena.com
Your alternative to
The Dallas Managed News  
            
The Real Deal

  Home       Search     

               

BadDealLogo.gif (6018 bytes)


 


                             

07/31/06  Not going to read about it in The Dallas Managed News.

It's been almost 10 years since Ross, Jr. and Tommy Hicks spent $4 million of their own money to get their hands on $150 million of our money.  In The Dallas Managed News '
5 years on, AAC gleams, development digs in , Dave Levinthal covers the arena's 5 year birthday and gives Jr., Tommy and their carnival barker Con Jerk/Ron Kirk a chance to say "told you so" -- except their current fabrications are as bogus as the lies they told in 1997 up to the election in January, 1998.

5 years on, AAC gleams, development digs in
Saturday, July 29, 2006
By DAVE LEVINTHAL / The Dallas Morning News
... factor in more than 1,000 concerts, sporting events and other attractions witnessed by at least 13 million patrons, and that's a fifth anniversary to brag about.
   It's especially auspicious considering American Airlines Center's shaky start.
   "It's certainly, in modern time, the best investment Dallas has ever made. Period," said Ross Perot Jr., who as owner of the Dallas Mavericks in the 1990s, pushed for construction of the arena while simultaneously proposing a surrounding mixed-use real estate development now known as Victory.
   Mr. Perot's Hillwood development company teamed up with Dallas Stars owner and Southwest Sports Realty principal Tom Hicks to build the arena, which in 2001 replaced nearby Reunion Arena as North Texas' largest indoor athletic and entertainment facility.
... A Dallas Area Rapid Transit train line now runs by it. And the Victory area is fast resembling an extension of downtown, with the skeletons of future buildings filling recently vacant land.
   "We have underpromised and overdelivered," said Ron Kirk, who, as Dallas mayor in the late 1990s, strongly advocated the arena's construction and Victory's development.
   "When you can leverage public investment to leverage private development in the way we did, you serve the public much better."
   No other Dallas project has commanded so much public investment. Few have produced as much debate over merit and value to taxpayers.
...  In 1998, Dallas voters approved the arena's $230 million funding package in one of the closest citywide ballots in history: 62,861 to 61,237.
... the 72-acre Victory development never proceeded as conceived.
... The venture promised 300,000 square feet of retail ? plus residential and office space ? in exchange for $43 million in public investment that the Dallas City Council already had approved.
... But Hillwood pressed on with Victory, and by 2005, passers-by began seeing evidence of construction. That building accelerated this year, marked most notably when the 33-story W Hotel opened last month. Adjacent retail, office and residential buildings are near completion.
   Still, the development is less than half completed, and its taxable value about one-third, when compared with original outlooks.
... Mr. Perot said. "We always wished [the Palladium plan] would have worked out. But Victory will be bigger. It's going to be higher density."
   Within 10 years, the Victory project will match or exceed the most optimistic of projections from the 1990s, Mr. Hicks said.
... said Dallas Assistant City Manager Ryan Evans, ... "Without the American Airlines Center, without the two professional sports teams playing there, the energy from downtown would be gone," Mr. Evans said.
... Knowing what they know today, Mr. Hicks said, voters would have "easily passed" the arena construction package eight years ago.
... Through 2018, the public is scheduled to directly invest $185.3 million in the AAC/Victory project ?
... "I still have the same problem with it: The city did not cut a good deal. The city got the shaft," said former council member Donna Blumer, who in 1997 voted against the arena funding package.
   While the arena is a proven success, that alone doesn't justify, or vindicate, the funding deal struck years ago, Mrs. Blumer said.
   And had the arena not been built? Developers still would have improved the property, she said, given its lucrative location just north of the downtown freeway loop and west of burgeoning Uptown.
   "We had rich robber barons use their influence on weak politicians. This experience has taught a lot of citizens that you can't trust bureaucrats and can't trust politicians who are currying favor with the elite," said Sharon Boyd, who helped lead a residents' campaign against the arena.
... Said Mr. Kirk: "This is not only a good deal, it's a very good deal."
... Mr. Hicks projects that the arena will last at least another 40 years.
... He and Mr. Perot contend that Victory will soon generate its own gravity, attracting more development and luring large companies to the area.
   And without AAC in the center of it all, they said, none of this would have been possible.
   "One or two [companies] soon," Mr. Perot said of corporate relocations. "In 10 or 15 years, you'll see 10 or 15 companies from the suburbs moving back in."

Ross, Jr. would have you believe that building a second basketball arena is "the best investment Dallas has ever made".  Easy for him to say, because he clearly is totally shameless.  Someone else might have a tough time making such a ludicrous claim.

I told Dave I was disappointed in the article -- that it seemed like a puff piece for Con Jerk, Jr. and Tommy H to make excuses for not delivering on their 1997 promises. 

Hicks and Ross, Jr. have had the benefits of tax abatements, use of our eminent domain rights to steal another developer's project -- still they are way behind on their promises. 

They even got the city council to force DART to divert its rail alignment so it runs on the West side of the arena, away from the residents and businesses of Uptown and Turtle Creek.  The poor West End businesses (who foolishly backed the arena sales tax) have not only been cut out of the benefits of the new arena, the Hicks/Perot mafia made sure their preferred DART light rail alignment (which Con Jerk and his puppets supported) does not even go to the West End now.  The original DART headquarters was in the West End area, where all the old rail lines converged. 

We told the voters that the arena would be self-contained with bars and restaurants, and that eventually arena patrons would not bother going as far away as the West End.  We were right.  With West End restaurants (including Dick's Last Resort, et al) deserting the area for lack of customers, who will be left to turn out the lights down there?

Every possible advantage has been given to Ross, Jr. and Tommy H, but their progress can't compare with the Harwood International developments just East of Victory, as Jim Schutze reports in:

The Allure of Azure; Harwood builds a fancy condo tower without a nickel in handouts from City Hall
By Jim Schutze Published Jul 20, 2006
... "Don't you think it's worthwhile for the city to offer developers tax breaks if doing it encourages development?"
... You mean always? Give them all tax breaks? Hell no. The city's already $10 billion in the hole on deferred maintenance. What, do you want us to give away the city's whole income so we can go $26 kabillion in the hole?
   Figure this. If a developer is building something on prime ground--an area everybody wants to get into already--then why does he need an incentive? This is America. People actually do business here without government subsidies.
   A few weeks ago I toured a 31-story luxury condominium tower slated to open next spring in Uptown at Wolf and McKinnon streets, near the Tollway and just south of Reverchon Park. It's called "Azure." Just "Azure."
... And you know what I really love about it? We're not paying for it.
   Not a nickel. They didn't ask the city for one dime to be paid to them from my tax money. I am filled with the pride of non-ownership.
   The obvious contrast--and subject of much publicity since its recent opening--is the W, a luxury hotel with condominium units half a mile southwest of Azure in Victory, ...
  
I wrote about how much money you and I are contributing to Victory a couple weeks ago ("Sticker Shock," June 29).
...  If Harwood International was willing to pay for some very hot dirt near downtown Dallas and then shoulder the full cost of putting this top-quality building on it--all on its own nickel with no local tax subsidy--why do we assume we have to pay other people to date us?
... Harwood put a foot on that edge of Uptown in 1982 with the Rolex Building and then spread its way out McKinnon Street with the Centex Building, then the Jones-Day Building, then the International Center Building completed in 2000. All of their properties are contiguous and joined by paths and skywalks. They call the whole development "International Center."
... The park is open to the public. It didn't cost the public a dime. Harwood maintains the park at its own expense.
... The Harwood people wouldn't talk to me about their competitors or city tax policy. But you and I can figure this out for ourselves. Every time the city grants a major subsidy to one developer, it screws all the other developers who are going into roughly that same niche in the market but don't get a subsidy.
...
the basic idea of TIFs when they started was that they would be used to spur development in very risky areas, where sane developers would fear to tread without serious incentives. Here's the problem: The Dallas City Council wants to give all the TIF money to the rich, powerful suck-ups who can invite them to the charity ball, and they're totally gutless half the time when it comes to projects that could really use the help.
...  John Ware, who was city manager in the '90s when Duncan was trying to get this deal done, wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole, and neither would most of the city council. No subsidy from this city, sister.
... The city should use tax subsidies to encourage high-risk, high-value developments that won't get done without subsidies. But it should not give tax subsidies to sure-thing developments that are going to get done, subsidy or not.
... What we get from the city instead is a lot of inconsistency, which just creates chaos. Mayor Laura Miller, for example, has been 95 percent steadfast in opposing incentives for people who don't need them. But she supported incentives for Lucy Crow Billingsley's new 7-Eleven headquarters building in the arts district.
... I hated the incentives handed out after the Billingsley deal to kabillionaire oilman Ray Hunt for his new headquarters downtown. But I have to admit: If Ray sees Laura dishing city dough to Lucy, then Ray has a right to want some city dough too.
... I guess it wouldn't be right to turn down wavy-haired developers if you've been generous with bald guys in the past. ...

Harwood International has done all their buildings, public areas and green space WITHOUT any taxpayer subsidy.  That's the equivalent of someone completing construction of a house all alone with one hand tied behind them before their competitor is half way through his construction project with his crew of 10.

I've said it before -- and I'll say it again -- and I'm sure I will say it at some future point: 

Ross Perot, Jr. is the ultimate welfare baby. 

The guy is the son of Ross Perot, who made his billions by landing a government project.  So much for a family history of free enterprise.  You can't expect Jr. to his risk his own corporate money when he learned so much from Daddy about leveraging crooked politicians.  Boy, did he find a couple of crooks at City Hall when he needed them in Con Jerk and City Manager Ware.

Levinthall expands on Donna Blumer's concern about Reunion arena in:

Once in middle of it all, Reunion now out of it;  Not much happens anymore inside its boxy walls now that the larger, more modern American Airlines Center gobbles up the bulk of Dallas' professional sporting events and major concerts.
Saturday, July 29, 2006 By DAVE LEVINTHAL / The Dallas Morning News
   Remember Reunion Arena?
... Sure, there's a prayer festival here, a college basketball game there. Last year, it sheltered people forced from their homes by Hurricane Katrina.
   But since the Dallas Sidekicks indoor soccer team folded in 2004, and the Dallas Desperados arena football team bolted to the AAC the same year, this city-owned facility is without a regular tenant.
... "We have no immediate plans for changing Reunion Arena," said Dallas Assistant City Manager Ryan Evans, the government's top economic development official.
   "But it's clear that eventually the land is going to have to be redeveloped."
   A noncompete clause in American Airlines Center's development agreement allows it first crack at most events suitable for its size.
... This year, a deal involving Dallas government, the Woodbine Development Corp. and an entertainment group led by Billy Bob Barnett of Billy Bob's Texas honky-tonk fame ... As structured, the deal would have deeded Reunion to Woodbine, which planned to demolish the facility this decade, in exchange for land near the Dallas Convention Center on which the city planned to partner with Mr. Barnett's group to build an entertainment complex.
... Mayor Laura Miller has suggested that Reunion Arena, or its land, would make a fine site for a casino, especially given development that she expects will happen over the next decade along downtown's section of the Trinity River Corridor.
   But such gambling remains outlawed in Texas, and the Legislature hasn't seriously considered legalizing it.
   Council member Pauline Medrano, for one, hopes legislators reconsider. Her council District 2 includes Reunion Arena. ...

Con Jerk and John Ware wanted to give Reunion Arena to Jr. and Tommy H from the get go -- give it to them for demolition, when we owed over $18 million on Reunion.  When even the polls of the pro-arena crowd showed Dallas voters did not want Reunion demolished, the council hastily entered into a one-sided deal that allowed American Airlines Center people the right to run Reunion and tied the city to a non-compete clause.  Just after a couple of years of running Reunion into the ground and diverting every possible venue over to the AAC, the AAC people advised the council they were exercising their contract rights to dump Reunion back on the city with that non-compete clause in tact.  Another great job of contract negotiating by Con Jerk/Ron Kirk and former City Manager John Ware.

We told voters Reunion would be demolished eventually because Tommy H and Ross, Jr. could not allow it to compete with THEIR arena.  They need every possible dime of revenue to make their deal work for THEM.  It does not generate tax revenue for your and my city needs, like more police and improved streets in OUR neighborhoods, but it certainly generates $$ to be spent INSIDE the Victory project.

Never forget that just a few months after the arena sales tax election, John Ware took a position with a Tom Hicks company, earning half a million ($500,000) annually, which was twice his city manager salary, LESS THAN SIX MONTHS AFTER HE GAVE AWAY OUR FARM.

Then there's that pesky little scandal
The Dallas Managed News  sat on until August, 1998 (when everyone is out of town) AFTER the arena sales tax election in January, 1998 and the Trinity Bonddoogle in June, 1998.  Con Jerk's lovely bride Matrice had been given $750,000 in stock options in a Hicks corporation for serving a few months on a Tom Hicks' board as his token Black Woman.  The DMN  reporter admitted to me he had the information before the election, but didn't want to "taint" the results.  Belo Corp. being an investor in "Victory" might have also swayed his lack of journalistic ethics.  See Hicks & Mrs. Kirk to read the DMN  7/11/99 story, headlined "Hicks cites race, gender in board offer".

At every level, the contract Ware and Con Jerk negotiated with Ross, Jr. and Tommy Hicks should be void per basic conflict of issues for all parties involved.  We told you it was a bad deal.  We were right

We told you the added tax to our hotel/motel room rates and daily car rentals would hurt, if not kill, our convention business.  Even with New Orleans out of the convention business now, our big, new convention center sits empty much more than not.  Even the hookers in the sex clubs aren't enough draw to get conventioneers to Dallas now.  We were right.

I'm a big fan of my State Rep. Rafael Anchia, but he's made a huge mistake in North Dallas linking up with Con Jerk and Commissioner John Wiley Price.  I'm already committed to Darrell Jordan in the Mayor's race, but I would support Gary Griffith/Sandra Dee before I would vote for someone being promoted by Con Jerk. 

You are known by your friends, and we know what Ron Kirk/Con Jerk did to us as mayor. 

Obviously, Belo sees him as their guy.  They are playing the same promotional game that Con Jerk got from D Magazine and
The Dallas Managed News .  You can expect any day to have a free DMN  hanging on your door with Anchia's picture on the top fold of their front page.  They've did his first puff piece on lower fold of the front page with Gromer Goffer's 7/28/06 story.  But, that was in an edition that people have to buy, and nobody much buys the DMN  anymore, figuratively or literally.

Is Raphael Anchia the reason Carol Reed (Con Jerk's former White Shadow) has been silent about which candidate she is going to manage?
    08/01 Michael Davis:
  
I have nothing against Mr. Anchia. I am impressed with some of the things he has tried to do in office. 
   My major beef is that I am sick of Blacks who act like they represent the entire race so they can get contributions or power or whatever else it is they do behind closed doors.
    When I write, I don't act like I speak for all Black people. How do these guys
(Kirk, Price) get away with this?  No one or two people speak for any entire race, That's like saying that one Caucasian or Asian speaks for all of them.
   It's easy for the media to play it up... all Belo cares about is who they can control for their pet projects.
   Who said that Kirk and Price speak for all Blacks? Absurd!
   This is why I write the way I do. What I see in Dallas is a small group of people who control everything through intimidation, lies, fear, and finding
a couple of people who pretend they can guarantee our votes when their influence has obviously waned.
   It is time to revolt against this nonsense. May 2007 is the City's chance to Vote "NO!" on this kind of influence peddling and garbage.
    Maybe we won't have all of the money that the powers that be control, but each person controls our own vote.
   Anchia's committing political suicide.  If he's got Kirk and Price helping him, I can't support him. 
 

Once again, The Dallas Managed News  promotes racial division in this city by allowing Goffer to paint Anchia's possible campaign as minority vs. White.   Laura Miller didn't cause racial division in this city.  She has just been dealing with the racial chaos left behind by Con Jerk/Ron Kirk and encouraged by the DMN In Anch?, many see the next Ron Kirk  (July 28, 2006 by GROMER JEFFERS JR. / The Dallas Morning News).

"He [Mr. Anch?] would do horrible in the African-American community because of the immigration issue," said political analyst Rufus Shaw Jr. "If he says he's for amnesty, he's going to lose half the African-American community. When he compares it to the civil rights issue, he'll lose the rest of it."

But Dallas County Commissioner John Wiley Price said Mr. Anch? could win and get support from black voters. He has consulted Mr. Anch? on his possible mayoral bid.

"He's the new face of Dallas. He's not only a good-looking face, but he's got brains and he builds coalitions," Mr. Price said. "And just like Ron Kirk, he's the American dream. Kirk got Hispanic votes, and Anch? can get black votes."

Boy, is that the kiss of death for Anchia's campaign?  Goffer did not do Anchia any favors with this front page story.  You have to assume that was his intent because Rufus Shaw is like Goffer's puppet master, if not ghost writer.

Why are only Hispanic or Black candidates capable of being the "American dream"? 

But, back to the Hicks/Perot arena and the "over-promised" and "under-delivered" development at Victory.   Ross, Jr. admitted early on it was not about basketball to him -- it was a real estate deal.  That may have been the only true statement he has ever made in regard to the Victory project.

No matter how successful Victory may be eventually become (they claim at least by 2018), it is never going to generate tax revenue that will benefit projects needed by Joe Taxpayer.  With the tax abatements Ron Kirk/Con Jerk and John Ware got for them, that development is going to tax revenue neutral for most of our lifetimes.

That's why the arena package negotiated by Con Jerk and John Ware will always be a bad deal!

 sb

                                        

    





                            

 

  Ward politics is the Devil's key to the soul of the city council.  It is how some council members got themselves in trouble in the past.  It is the bait that will get others in trouble in the future. 4/6/8