|
Tim Dickey
| |
06/15/06 Angela Hunt
rocks, Council Sucks.
If you listened to this week's city council meeting, you already know what I'm
talking about. If you haven't kept up with this Comprehensive Plan (aka
Forward Dallas!) stuff,
then you have not been a good DallasArena.com reader.
|
Let's assume the worse. Forward Dallas! is a zoning plan that redesigns
the city with little or no citizen input. As Councilwoman Angela Hunt
pointed out during her unsuccessful plea to her colleagues to support the Plan
Commission's (CPC) version of a new Comprehensive Plan rather than the plan being
pushed by city staff, having lots of meetings with citizens and listening to
their concerns and then ignoring all they said does not equate to citizen input. |
|
|
06/15/06 JC:
Nice summation. Is blood
pressure medicine expensive? As an
optimistic person, I am sure
the Federal
government will have to come in and run Big D in the next
10 years. |
|
I can't tell you the final outcome because WRR stopped broadcasting the council
meeting at 6 pm, right after Councilman Mitch Rasansky seconded Councilwoman
Hunt's motion to reinstate many (if not all) CPC changes to Freaking-Easy's plan
he designed for Portland, Oregon.
|
From
The Dallas Managed News report
on the pseudo-council hearing, it's not clear whether Councilwoman Linda Koop's
amendment (that was to happen before the final council vote) took out the
problematic transit corridors, or whether DMN's
Levinthal refers to the ill-fated CPC version which removed them until DART
determines where the actual transit corridors will be. |
|
|
06/20/06
Anonymouse:
The fact that
Angela Hunt split with Velveeta is not so surprising.
If you assume that Velveeta now works for the developers.
Not the homeowners. |
|
Here's the DMN
version of what happened at city council:
 |
Forward Dallas land-use plan gets go-ahead;
Council backs city staff's proposal, rejects commission's version
Thursday, June 15, 2006
by DAVE LEVINTHAL /
The Dallas Morning News |
Despite stiff
public objection, the Dallas City Council on Wednesday overwhelmingly
approved Forward Dallas, a comprehensive land-use plan presented by city
staff and meant to guide city government's development decisions for decades
to come.
With its 12-2 vote,
the council rejected an alternative version
recommended by the council-appointed City Plan Commission. Earlier
this month, the plan commission approved the comprehensive plan by a 10-2
vote, but not before recommending to the council numerous amendments.
... Dallas hired urban planner John Fregonese to
produce the comprehensive plan, and he did so after about 18 months of
community and professional input.
"Input doesn't mean a damned thing if
it's not incorporated into the final plan," said council member Angela Hunt,
who voted against the plan. "This to me is a failure of process. This is the
first public hearing before this body. How it is appropriate that we take a
vote on this is beyond me."
Ms. Hunt tried without success to
persuade her colleagues to pass the comprehensive plan with many of the plan
commission's amendments reinserted. Council member Mitchell Rasansky told
his colleagues the vote should be delayed.
... During a public hearing Wednesday before the
vote, dozens of Dallas residents argued for and against the city staff's
recommendation to the council.
... supporters of the plan commission's version
said that the city staff's proposal doesn't solidify enough green space for
future generations and that City Hall will treat the plan as law, instead of
a tool to guide development decisions.
Former council
member Veletta Forsythe Lill, however, praised the city staff's proposal.
"We can create a sustainable
community with good urban design," Ms. Lill told the council. "It encourages
more efficient land use. I urge you not to fear change."
The plan will not supplant current
neighborhood land-use plans, nor will it preclude neighborhoods from
pursuing special designations, such as historic districts, said Theresa
O'Donnell, Dallas' development services director.
Council members voting for the
staff-recommended plan were Mayor Pro Tem Don Hill, Deputy Mayor Pro Tem
Elba Garcia, Mr. Blaydes, Mr. Chaney and James Fantroy, Gary Griffith, Linda
Koop, Pauline Medrano, Ron Natinsky, Ed Oakley, Steve Salazar and Maxine
Thornton-Reese.
... Mayor Laura Miller, who was involved in
private Wright amendment-related meetings throughout the afternoon, wasn't
present for the public hearing or council debate and did not vote.
... Some supporters of the city staff's
recommended plan, for example, questioned whether the plan commission's
amended version focused enough on southern-sector development.
The amended
version, meanwhile, placed greater emphasis on the development of detached,
single-family housing units. The staffers' plan called for greater
development of apartment, townhouse and condominium housing.
The amended version also scrapped
"transit corridors," designed to produce denser developments along
well-traveled Dallas thoroughfares. |
See what I mean?
During the citizen testimony (which the council ignored), I kept checking
www.DallasObserver.com
for its
Unfair
Park: The Dallas Observer Blog.
Robert Wilonsky and Jim Schutze were at courtside sending back blow by blow
accounts of the doings.
 |
|
2:44 pm The
chamber is packed with
Angela Hunt fans?if
nothing else, their
bright green ?CPC YES?
and ?PEOPLE?S PLAN?
stickers suggest they
also want the version of
Forward Dallas!
containing the Plan
Commission?s
alterations. Not yet to
the discussion yet, and
room is getting warm and
restless.
3:01 pm Jim and I
have decided Laura is on
a Southwest flight to
Vegas, cause she sure as
hell ain?t here. One
thing I did notice as
Bill Blaydes was
bemoaning the yay vote
regarding the homeless
shelter (?It will
destroy the southeast
corridor!?):
He?s kinda?unhinged.
?
3:27 pm The first
speaker against the plan
was Neil Emmons, a plan
commissioner. He was
representing Cay Kolb, a
former city planning
commissioner and former
DART board member. She
could not attend the
meeting today, Emmons
told the council,
because she is tending
to her husband in an
intensive care unit?and
not taking him off life
support, as Emmons
mistakenly told the
council?but she had
enough time to write a
letter to the council in
which she said:
?Never?have I witnessed
anything as fraudulent
or underhanded as this
ForwardDallas!
comprehensive planning
process. The public
input has been supressed;
the staff has funneled a
foregone conclusion upon
which they are asking
you to vote today.
Please take a deep
breath and do not be
sucked into this fraud.?
And things are
just beginning. Oh, and
by the way, still no
mayor.
3:57
pm So
far there have been legal and
accounting issues raised regarding
FD! One speaker said it violates
Texas zoning law, another said it?s
inviting dangerously speculative
development along the so-called
transit corridors that cannot even
withstand the density proposed in
the plan. And a woman from Bluffview
cried at the podium, terrified the
transit corridor plan will gut her
neighborhood. And the council looks
like it could not care less. Ed
Oakley really oughta stop biting his
nails. The mayor still a no-show,
lucky her.
4:04
Among those in the
audience is Dwayne Jones,
executive director of
Preservation Dallas,
who says he is ?perplexed?
by the outrage being
directed toward the plan and
the council committee that
approved it. Contrary to the
opinions of the speakers
snaked around the council
chambers, who insist
ForwardDallas! will ruin
their neighborhoods by
stuffing them full of
multi-family housing, Jones
insists FD! is in fact
receptive to and protective
of neighborhoods. ?I?m very
perplexed by the comments
that people feel that their
neighborhoods are being
threatened,? Jones says. ?I
didn?t see that anywhere in
the plan, and we are, of
course, supportive of
neighborhoods. Either there
has been some grave
misunderstanding, or there?s
something in the plan that I
didn?t see.?
And something we didn?t see? The mayor.
5:25 pm
The council?s talking now, and I
think it?s gonna be a sweep, damned
near. ?Dallas is the ninth-largest
city in the country, and we?ve
developed half of it,? says Bill
Blaydes, who looked like he was
dozing during the naysayers?
speeches. ?There is a major need for
what we are doing today.?
Now he?s offering a
stunningly fascinating history of
city streets, which pairs nicely
with Linda Koop?s talk about
Boston?s rapid transit. (Is this
what hell is like? A civics lesson
from this guy? James Fantroy loved
it: ?I was gonna invite Brother
Blaydes to the Sunday morning
service.?)
I think Fantroy is for the
plan. Says he: ?At last, at last,
thank God at last there will be
development of southern Dallas.? So,
yeah. Also, he said you can
?threaten? not to vote for the bond
election, the Trinity, the ?American
center,? but shame on you for being
so short-sighted and so wrong.
And now
Ed Oakley?s giving Theresa
O?Donnell, director of long-range
planning, a big, wet kiss for all
her hard work. Fregonese is
at the podium with her. All that?s
left is the shouting?Angela Hunt,
you?re on yer own?and the passing of
a version of ForwardDallas! largely
bereft of community involvement.
Mayor Laura, yer thoughts?
Oh. Wait. Never mind. ?
4:50 pm John Fregonese, the
proud papa of ForewardDallas!,
is in the house, but has kept
quiet. He?s been walking around,
standing and sitting and
stroking his beard, looking
alternatively bored, frustrated,
aghast and elated as his baby
gets batted about the room.
His name has been evoked
a hundred times today?sometimes
positively, sometimes as a
perjorative, sometimes just
plain wrong. (?Freakin?
Easy? has been my fave
thus far, courtesy of a South
Dallas property owner.)
The pro-FD?ers are up to
bat now, and the room has
cleared out considerably. Even
the anti faction has started to
leave, resigned, perhaps, to the
inevitable. ?They?ve made up
their minds,? Virginia
McAlester, well-known local
preservationist, says of the
council. Nonetheless, she
insists she is holding out hope
for the passing of the Plan
Commission?s version.
What Jim and I hope for?
The mayor.
?Robert
Wilonsky
|
See what I mean?
Unfair Park: The
Dallas Observer Blog
is really a must read (unless you are obsessed with the latest celebrity
sighting or restaurant closing, then you need to stick with
DMag's FrontBurner).
Listening to the speakers, David McAtee, Virginia McAlester, Steve Clique, Pat
White, etc., it felt like I was reliving the 80's when we were all fighting the
monster City Place project (which only half-happened, thank God), fighting DART
to keep light rail off the Katy and get it in a tunnel under Central Expressway
and defending the Wright Amendment for Love Field.
We were right about City Place. The retail on both sides of the freeway
would have never happened under the original Planned Development Southland
wanted and got from City Council. It would have been a massive office
complex to fit the pink thing on the East side. It was going to be a new
Downtown -- just what the Central Business needed. Now, even Southland is
leaving their building for a new building in the old Downtown (which you and I
are subsidizing for Lucy Billingsley with a huge tax abatement).
We were right about having DART in the Central corridor and not using the Katy
(one-track) line. The Katy Trail is now a major draw and actually
stimulates development and property sales in the area.
Looks like we just delayed the inevitable regarding the Wright Amendment, but we
had almost 20 years of noise abatement. If we get another 7 or 8 years of
limited flights out of Love Field, technology may resolve the matter by then
with new types of carriers. We might even find a better use for Love Field
altogether by that time.
Back to the Comprehensive Plan. Angela Hunt just rocked during her
comments.
The last person to speak to the council was Princess Velveeta Lill (former
councilwoman), who started by mentioning how many days it has been since she was
on the city council. Doesn't that sound great: former councilwoman
Lill? She is still a pedantic, puffed up bag of wind. There was no
reason for her to speak because her side (the Freaking-Easy side) had it all
locked up. She didn't identify herself as a paid consultant or lobbyist,
but that's the only explanation for her being there and pointing out how long
it's been since she bored us to tears as a council member. Anyway, she
alienated her former base of supporters on Wednesday. That must mean she's
given up her dreams of running for County Judge of the Commissioner's Court, or
for Mayor or Queen of Egypt.
The people who were there against Freaking-Easy's plan are the Who's-Who of East
Dallas and Oak Lawn/Turtle Creek. They are the only people in town who
even know Princess Velveeta, and they will not forget what she said and did
Wednesday. That's good news.
I was disgusted with the tone of council comments supporting Freaking-Easy's
plan.
Bill Blaydes was clearly trying to endear himself with Black voters in South
Dallas, which indicates he has not abandoned his impossible dream of running for
mayor.
Elba Garcia pretty much called Angela Hunt a liar by taking forever to respond
point by point to Hunt's call to arms about the Comprehensive Plan (see
Councilwoman Angela Hunt),
which DallasArena.com and several websites posted.
Ed Oakley was just ridiculous, trying to convince those people in the audience
that he knows more than they do about anything.
Councilman Fantroy played the Southern Sector vs North Dallas card (as in race
card).
Those mayoral wannabe's (excepting Fantroy, who keeps reminding us he's on
borrowed time to do God's work) pretty much killed any chance they ever had at
being elected citywide for dog catcher. That's good news.
When Angela Hunt ran for council, I supported Candy Marcum (big mistake) and
then Hunt's opponent in the runoff. I didn't know Hunt personally, but her
relationship with Princess Velveeta was enough to make me look elsewhere.
Like a lot of people in Oak Lawn, I wanted Districts 2 and 14 divided at Central
Expressway, rather than splitting up East Dallas and Oak Lawn/Turtle Creek into
two districts that dissected neighborhoods and communities of interest.
Princess Velveeta did not want to give up her rich arts patrons on Turtle Creek.
Her suck-ups (Cay Kolb, Neil Emmons, Judith Herst Smith, etc.) backed her and
Mad Max Aaronson's efforts to keep Oak Lawn neighborhoods under-represented at
City Hall. They were not happy with what Lill had to say Wednesday.
That's good news.
I could be wrong because my brain just clicks off whenever I hear Mad Max
Aaronson's voice, but I think she was taking Lill's side. Aaronson spoke
during the pro-Freaking-Easy time, but so did Joyce Lockley who spoke FOR the
CPC Version. If anyone understood what Aaronson said differently, please
let me know. If she was siding with Lill against Hunt, that is truly
interesting news.
As I said, Angela Hunt just rocked. Hunt was dramatic, without any of the
theatrics we suffered from Princess Velveeta. Hunt was emotional, without
any of the fakeness of Princess Velveeta. Hunt was articulate, using
multi-syllabic words when necessary, but mostly speaking very plainly and
firmly. She didn't say "Input
doesn't mean a damned thing if it's not incorporated into the final plan".
She said "Input
doesn't mean a damn thing if it's not incorporated into the final plan".
She didn't stutter. "Damned" is not the same word as "damn".
She would pause, catch her breath and just cut her colleagues some new body
cavities. I would have loved to have been there to watch her body language
and the rest of the council (except Mitch Rasansky) squirming and frowning.
Because Hunt was grateful to Councilwoman Koop for an amendment she was to make
(after WRR left the hearing), I guess we should cut Linda some slack -- but not
much. She's so smart, and I'm so disappointed Linda's such a team player.
I knew she would not be a maverick like Paul Fielding, but I really thought she
would be more independent than she is. That's not good news.
If you don't care about zoning or land use, all of this probably is no big deal.
If you own property in the city of limits of Dallas, Texas, you better start
caring about zoning and land use. The Freaking-Easy Plan that the council
passed is going to be a killer for North Dallas.
Unless you struggled to listen to Weeping William Blaydes, you missed his
response to a woman who is worried about the impact on her near-Northwest
Highway home and neighborhood (Bluffview). To paraphrase, he said 'Yeah,
MY home is safe from Freaking-Easy because I didn't buy near
Northwest Highway. If you buy near a highway, you are stupid and deserve
for your council to stick it to you." Never mind that she pays buckets
full of property taxes that get wasted and could get more bank for her tax bucks
living outside our city limits. Never mind that City Hall has allowed and
encouraged development right up to Northwest Highway's easement.
Blaydes pretty much sums up City Hall's attitude toward Dallas homeowners -- you
invest in Dallas, you take your chances.
It's the same attitude they have toward Love Field area homeowners. You
invest in Dallas under a 30 year old contract the city has with Ft. Worth, you
take your chances that new people at City Hall will break the city's municipal
word, not only with Ft. Worth but with Dallas homeowners who bought their homes
with the protection of the Wright Amendment in place.
Just goes to show you -- you can't trust MOST politicians. That's old
news.
I'm going to try to make some time this weekend to actually watch the repeat of
the council meeting on cable. I don't know for sure what happened or what
the council finally did on Wednesday regarding Freaking-Easy's Plan. But,
neither does the council know what they did. If you think anyone but Hunt
poured over every section of staff's recommended version of Freaking-Easy's
Plan, there are THREE UNFUNDED String Thing Bridges I can sell you for cheap.
The fact that 12 council members ignored a recommendation supported by 13 of 15
Plan Commissioners is truly bad news.
Who do you think appoints the Plan Commissioners? Every council member who
voted against their Plan Commissioner's recommendation on Freaking-Easy's Plan
pretty much tells you they don't respect the person they appointed. The
Plan Commissioners had multiple hearings and meetings and sessions regarding
Freaking-Easy's Plan, and they changed it a lot. That was good news.
City staff (not elected or appointed public officials) didn't like what they got
from the citizens who volunteer their time to serve on the Plan Commission, so
they refused to present the CPC's recommended version that reflected community
input. This is really bad news.
As Jim Schutze and others have said, this is the worst council we have ever had
-- ever had. Some complain because the Mayor can't form a coalition with
enough of them to get her agenda through. I say, good for Mayor Miller for
not sinking to their depths. To be a team player with this council means
you have to check your common sense and integrity at the door.
Frequently, important votes at council are 13-2 with Mayor Miller and Mitch
Rasansky the sole votes holding out against corrupting developers and bad
projects and unmerited tax abatements to billionaires. Doesn't make the
rest of the council right and Miller and Rasansky wrong -- just shows who has
the guts to stand for the right thing against all odds.
This week, Angela Hunt stepped away from the sleazy pack and voted her
conscience. As you would expect, Mitch Rasansky was the only one with the
courage to stand with her in a 12-2 vote. Mayor Miller was in Wright
Amendment negotiations all afternoon, but I know she would have been the third
vote with Hunt.
I don't know whether my early opposition to Angela Hunt was right or wrong.
She clearly was not as tied to or controlled by Princess Velveeta as I feared.
Velveeta was always embarrasingly unctuous toward Lordi Palmer (one of her
District 14 predecessors and mentors), and I assumed Hunt would treat Lill in
the same manner. Apparently, Princess Velveeta made the same false
assumption because Councilwoman Hunt has been anything but unctuous toward Lill
on several matters. That's really good news.
Speaking of news, or gossip, it's pretty much a given that Don Hill has been
convinced to run for Mayor. One of my really smart friends, who is very
often right on the money, says the woman behind Hill's mayoral aspirations is
none other than our favorite MPossible. We hear Mary has been dragging
Hill in front of various big donor groups and touting his potential, never mind
a recent divorce or a little FBI investigation. The fun part is that
MPossible is a big backer of Sandra Dee Gary Griffith, who also is pretending to
run for Mayor. My friend says this is a Griffith/Poss scam to make sure
another mayoral candidate cannot carry South Dallas.
It's only going to get better. It can't get worse.
sb
| |

|