|
| |
05/01/06 City Staffers
want to cover Dallas with apartments.
Dallas homeowners are in
distress, and there are few who hear our pleas for help.
If you live in a single-family
neighborhood that has apartment complexes within a block or two, you know the
problems they cause your community. The crime, the traffic, the impact on
DISD schools caused by multi-family housing are consistent problems regardless
of whether your neighborhood is in North West Dallas or North East Dallas or
East Dallas. If you live near apartments, you have problems that are not
your doing.
 |
Neighbors going after apartments in Lake Highlands;
Crime cited as homeowners group files complaint
Sunday, April 30, 2006
by WENDY HUNDLEY / The Dallas
Morning News |
A Lake
Highlands advocacy group is trying a new tactic to pressure owners of
two apartment complexes that residents say are crime-ridden and don't pay
taxes.
The Lake Highlands Area Improvement
Association has filed a complaint with a
state-mandated affordable housing corporation that helped finance the Bent
Creek and Creekwood Village apartments.
Over the past 12 months,
more than 300 crimes have been reported at those
properties, Dallas police records show. They include reports of
assault, burglary, theft, possession of drugs and murder.
Steve Wakefield, president of the
improvement group, said the unusual strategy "is an experiment to see if
there is some sort of pressure or enforcement mechanism that can be used" to
reduce criminal activity at the apartments.
The association has
... supported a Dallas lawsuit against another
apartment complex with a long list of code violations.
... the recent complaint by the alliance of
homeowners brings to focus another issue: the tax benefit carried by the
nonprofit corporation that owns the complexes.
"These
complexes don't pay property taxes but are drawing a considerable amount of
police and code [enforcement] resources," Mr. Wakefield said.
The group filed its complaint with
the Texas State Affordable Housing Corp., which was created by state law to
issue bonds to finance single-family and multi-family housing for low- and
moderate-income residents.
Four years ago, it helped the
American Housing Foundation, a nonprofit based in Amarillo, purchase Bent
Creek and Creekwood apartments.
... "We want to make sure they're fulfilling their
promise of providing safe and affordable housing," said Katherine Closmann,
executive vice president of the Texas State Affordable Housing Corp. "If
there's a safety problem, that's an issue."
... While officials can make
recommendations to the apartment owners, the affordable housing corporation
has limited powers, Ms. Closmann said.
... She confirmed that
American Housing Foundation is exempt from paying property taxes on the two
apartments.
... Because the tax exemption was granted before
the law changed, the owners will be free from taxes until the properties are
sold, she said.
The Bent Creek apartment complex has
a long history of crime. ... one of three
apartment complexes targeted in Operation Kitchen Sink, a monthlong sweep
that began in December 2004 to rid housing areas of drugs and crime.
... also the focus of a November
police raid that netted several arrests for drugs, theft and an illegal
weapon. ... |
Northwest Dallas can certainly
empathize with the Lake Highlands Area Improvement Association. As I've
said many times, 98% of the crime in my crime watch beat is generated in or from
the apartments on the edge of our neighborhood. Thank God, the DISD is
taking 3 really bad apartment complexes through eminent domain to build a middle
school, which will cut our numbers considerably.
|
What is so egregious about the Lake Highlands situation with Bent Creek and
Creekwood Apartments is that the biggest problems in their community DO NOT PAY
PROPERTY TAXES. They cost the city hundreds of thousands in police
services, but they DO NOT PAY PROPERTY TAXES. Which means Steve Wakefield
and his fellow homeowners are paying taxes to subsidize a hell hole. What
a sweet deal for American Housing Foundation! You can imagine what classy
folks are running that scam! |
|
|
05/01/06
Anonymouse:
These apartments are owned by Steve Sterquell of American
Housing Foundation of Amarillo, a low income housing corp.
Is he
any relation to JC Sterquell , a local
speculator? This
could be another case of subsidized scamming of low income
housing
money. Or not. |
|
It would not matter whether it's the slime balls out of Amarillo or some other
slum landlord. Apartment complexes are a cancer in any community.
Once land is converted to multi-family, it is next to impossible to get it
back-zoned to single family. We can't take a property owner's right to get
this most bang from his buck. What about the homeowner in the neighborhood
next to a multi-family development? Their right to the peaceful and safe
enjoyment of their home is reduced to almost zero.
Homeowners who live on the edge of my neighborhood share alleys with
multi-family units. They have to hear boom boxes blaring all hours of the
night. They have their fences vandalized with gang graffiti. We just
learned that a home burned in our neighborhood was started by a little hoodlum
from one of those apartment complexes. We didn't learn it from the police
or fire departments -- the apartment manager told us. She was bragging
about evicting the little arsonist's family.
More apartment complexes in the City of Dallas? We need to be reducing the
number of rental and multi-family units. If you want to build a big
apartment complex, you should have to buy and tear down an old one.
|
|
|
05/01/06 Michael Davis:
One thing that?s not being addressed in anything I?ve read
is the fact that we should be building new multi-family
only where we are replacing old multifamily complexes.
There are many places in the
Southern Sector where vacant land that should
have been used for affordable single-family homes,
but were wasted on crappy looking rental units.
The most recent example is at
I-35 and Ann Arbor in District 4 where a
hideous rental townhouse complex was built in a place that sorely
needed new homes. In fact, the zoning was changed from commercial
to allow this complex to be built -- 20
Acres along the interstate that could?ve been
used for needed retail or single-family homes.
Gone. Soon to be crime
ridden for the next 30 years.
We shouldn?t be
developing a plan that allows for more of this chicanery to occur.
Dallas shouldn?t be forced to
take all of the new residents that come to North Texas, and we
shouldn?t compound the strain on city
resources by building new apartments.
We should be courting residents of other cities as well as
those who already live here who want to
own homes. That?s HOMES, not apartments.
Let Collin County build a
bunch of new apartments to house these folks. We?ll take the
homeowners, thank you very much.
Chief Kunkle?s job is
hard enough without dumping a bunch of new apartment complexes into
his lap.
|
|
So, why would
Development Director Theresa O'Donnell
think imposing even more apartments on communities north of the Trinity is a
good thing? Does she have a clue about this city? Does she ever
contemplate the impact of bad planning? The messes we have in Vickery
Meadow and Northwest Dallas and Lake Highlands all originate with the density of
apartments.
 |
'Multifamily' back in council lexicon;
Dallas: Comprehensive plan backs off focus on single-family housing
By EMILY RAMSHAW / The
Dallas Morning News
Tuesday, April 25, 2006 |
For years, it's been Dallas City
Council members' mantra: "We want more single-family homes ? not
multifamily."
Now the results of Dallas' first
comprehensive plan are forcing city officials to change their tune.
As Dallas' population soars during
the next 30 years, so too will its supply of condos, townhomes and
apartments, planners say.
But while landlocked neighborhoods
north of the Trinity River will become increasingly urban, single-family
subdivisions still will crop up across the southern sector, they say ? the
only place in the city there's still room for them.
This is the vision outlined in the
new Forward Dallas plan, a 450-page document designed by urban planner
John Fregonese after more than 18 months of
community meetings. But it's one not everyone likes.
District 14
council member Angela Hunt, for one, says the city is overwhelmed
with multifamily housing ? and the crime, overflowing schools and meager
home-ownership rates that come with it. She's not ready to believe that the
southern sector is the only place for new single-family homes, she said,
pointing to acres of run-down apartment complexes and "under-utilized" land
north of the Trinity.
With the current version of the
comprehensive plan, "The City Council will be speaking out two sides of its
mouth," Ms. Hunt said. "If the plan has its way, we're
potentially looking at Vickery Meadows on a much larger scale."
... Development Director
Theresa O'Donnell says: The people are coming. North Texas will see
about 3.5 million new residents in the next 30 years. And 500,000 are headed
to Dallas ? the equivalent of more than 220,000 new households.
The new households would more than
double the city's property tax revenue, planners say. If Dallas doesn't
welcome new residents within the city limits, those people will take their
money and their tax revenue to the suburbs.
... "We're not a suburb; we're the urban center of
this region," Ms. O'Donnell said. "This is about competition. The region is
growing. The question is, how much growth will Dallas capture?"
... For those who haven't noticed, Dallas isn't
New York City, Ms. Hunt said. And it loves its single-family homes, from the
cozy bungalows of East Dallas to the larger houses in areas such as Preston
Hollow that critics deride as "McMansions."
These are the
neighborhoods that attract upper-middle-class families, Ms. Hunt said,
taxpayers who have increasingly fled Dallas for the suburbs. If Dallas wants
to compete, the city needs more single-family homes ? and a townhouse isn't
going to cut it.
...Today's residents may love their single-family homes, Ms.
O'Donnell said. But in 30 years, Dallas is going to look far different.
As the Hispanic population surges,
she said, the new generation may seek dense "multigenerational" housing,
urban communities with a lively street life.
... The comprehensive plan anticipates about
50,000 new single-family homes in the next 30 years ? almost all of them in
southern Dallas. And planners hope to lure young families and empty-nesters
to alternative homeownership opportunities in North Dallas, from townhouses
to high-rise condos.
... Ms. Hunt understands having multiple housing
options. But if the goal is homeownership, she said, single-family homes are
the way to go. Their ownership rates far surpass any other housing stock,
she said, and townhouses aren't a close second.
... And she isn't buying the argument that the
only developable land is in the southern sector. "This idea is being pushed
on us," she said. "There are areas where we have a sprawl of apartments that
could be turned into modest single-family homes instead."
That's economically unrealistic, Ms.
O'Donnell said. Land values coupled with redevelopment costs make a
conversion to single-family homes highly unlikely.
... "If
you live up north inside LBJ Freeway, anything that gets redone is going to
be high density," said council member Bill Blaydes, whose Northeast Dallas
district has struggled to find new uses for its run-down apartment
complexes. "You want to talk suburban? Go to McKinney and Allen."
... |
Interesting that Mayor-Wannabe
Bill Blaydes has now conceded Dallas will be all-multi-family. Just what
Lake Highlands needs to hear from its council representative, and the last thing
Dallas voters need to hear from someone who wants to be mayor. He's got no
chance of winning the mayor's race, and probably will not do so well in his next
council race in Lake Highlands. It was a big mistake on my part to have
endorsed Bill Blaydes because he has turned out to be a disaster. He
supports plopping big box stores and centers all over town, regardless of the
location or negative impact. Worse, now he's the champion of apartment
developments.
We are being hit with a two-prong pitch fork. Our city Development
Director, Theresa O'Donnell, is promoting multi-family, as well as most of the
city council. We do have a strong voice for single-family in councilwoman
Angela Hunt.
| Not only does, O'Donnell not
understand Dallas, she certainly does not understand Hispanic families.
Those who live in apartments are not living in those rabbit warrens by choice.
They want to raise their families in single-family homes, just like everyone
else. My neighbors are more typical of Hispanic families than anything
O'Donnell foresees. The elderly lady across the street has several grown
children, grandchildren and even great grandchildren. They come over to
see her, but she lives in her own single-family house alone. |
|
|
05/03/06 Paul Patterson:
The population of the Metroplex is expected to double in the
next 15 years. How on earth can one expect 14-15 million people to
live in single family homes in one metropolitan area? It doesn't
work in London, Paris, Sao Paulo, or New York and it won't work here
either. I know Dallas isn't New York, but it will be in the not too
distant future. Like it or not, Megacities are the wave of the
future and apartments are the most efficient way to house millions
of people.
I wish you would stop blaming
Dallas' crime problems on apartment dwellers. The vast majority of
apartment dwellers are decent, hard working, law abiding citizens.
There are plenty of home owners how beat their wives, murder, steal,
molest, cheat on their taxes, commit arson, engage in identity
theft, play loud music at all hours, and destroy neighborhoods.
|
|
Children should not live in apartments. Children certainly don't need
to be living in multi-storied developments like we have in Uptown and Oak Lawn.
There is little or no green space required of apartment complexes. We
still allow developers to build apartment complexes designed for singles and couples,
even though we know families will be leasing those units in the not too distant
future.
O'Donnell thinks apartments are going to provide a new and needed tax
base. That's bogus on many levels. The Lake Highlands situation in
Wendy Hundley's story is proof positive that O'Donnell is just flat wrong in
thinking apartments are a positive for the city's future.
The law that allows two apartment complexes to be property tax free has been
changed, but some future bleeding heart will come up with another idiotic plan
that will cause more damage.
Apartments are appraised on the physical
condition (decrepit or otherwise) of their structures, not on the land or nearby
new developments or real estate sales. When you factor in the increased police
and fire activity generated with multi-family, there is no gain in tax revenue.
There is actually a loss of tax revenue because so much more city services are
required for apartments and apartment residents, than is required by
single-family neighborhoods.
 |
Why Plan?
If citywide planning means more apartments and strip retail, let's
not plan
By Jim Schutze Article Published
Apr 27, 2006 |
...
There's a political freight train running through City
Hall right now called the "comprehensive plan" for Dallas. We're
one of the few large cities in America that doesn't have one.
... And how do you feel about just
bending over backward to load the city up with more and more
apartments? That's the major thrust of the so-called
comprehensive plan.
This plan is all concept,
like lecture notes from Planning 101. It looks like something
you could plop down on Seattle. In fact, I just came back from a
wedding there: It looks sort of like Seattle.
But it does not look like anything that
grew organically out of what is on the ground now in Dallas,
Texas.
... Michael Jung
is a zoning attorney ... Jung and
others like him think people who already live and own property
in a neighborhood should get first dibs on what happens there.
In other words, people far away from them--bureaucrats,
planners, land speculators, necromancers--should not be able to
wave their Harry Potter wands at a single-family residential
neighborhood and say, "Poof! I dub thee apartments and retail!"
... Jung says the comprehensive plan
about to come to the city council is not based on this same kind
of arduous consensus-building. But it includes a map of major
changes for neighborhoods and areas all over the city,
apparently reflecting the wishes of city
staff and the city's consultant, Fregonese Calthorpe
Associates of Portland, Oregon.
... Jung says no matter what anybody
calls the map now--vision illustration, ink blot, bubblegum
joke--developers will use it as a statement of city policy in
the future.
... City council
member Angela Hunt represents District 14 in East Dallas
and Oak Lawn rimming the Park Cities. She thinks the overall
thrust of the comprehensive plan will be pressure for massive
redevelopment.
"As we increase densities
in the city and have more concrete in Uptown and State-Thomas,
for example, it's essential that we require developers to set
aside concentrated green space," Hunt said last week. She says
this plan doesn't do that, and city staff and the consultant
have told her they don't want to do that.
... staff and the consultant have been
happy to regulate in the other direction. For example, the plan
goes into exhaustive detail on parking regulations in order to
allow developers to provide fewer off-street parking spots.
... Virginia
McAlester is a nationally recognized author and expert on urban
residential architecture and for years has been one of
the most influential voices for neighborhood preservation in
Dallas. ... She thinks the
comprehensive plan is a great idea in theory, but she says the
city will pay in blood if the plan gets rushed through the
approval process before the kinks are out.
... I also spoke last week to former
council member Veletta Lill, who represented District 14 before
Angela Hunt. Lill, a strong supporter of the plan,
... The plan is just a plan, she said
several times. "This is not zoning." She said the map really
isn't a map. "It's blobs of color on a page." She said a process
is already in place, once this initial stage of the plan has
been adopted, to do focused mini-plans for specific
neighborhoods providing the level of detail and reassurance that
McAlester, Hunt and Jung look for.
... Somebody needs to to stop this
train and let it cool its wheels a little. Let people look at it
and talk about it. Or, failing that, jump it off the track and
watch it smoke.
We can survive with no
plan. But a sloppy one could kill us.
|
Have to tell you I'm becoming a
big fan of Councilwoman Angela Hunt. Even if she was way wrong on
the Ray Hunt tax abatement last year, she is so right in her opposition to the
proposed comprehensive plan being pushed by city staff and several council
members. That Hunt is on the opposite of Princess Velveeta Lill is enough
to give her credibility, but she is standing tall in her strong opposition to
this ill-planned Comprehensive Plan. Call your council member today and
ask them to vote against this iceberg that's out there waiting sink our
municipal Titantic.
 |
|
Call your council
member today and ask them to vote against the Comprehensive Plan.
It's an iceberg that's out there waiting sink our municipal Titantic. |
Bill Blaydes knows better than anyone what can happen to a stable single-family
area like Highlands when it is surrounded by apartments. He campaigned
against apartments. Now, he is a big proponent of overwhelming this city
with the blight that always accompanies apartment complexes.
We desperately need help. We are not going to get it from City Hall.
We aren't likely to get it from Austin or D.C., because their misguided social
engineering schemes have caused much of our urban problems.
Who's going to answer our SOS?
sb | |

|