|
|
|
04/17/06 FARMERS BRANCH VISION or NIGHTMARE?
Yes, the city of Farmers Branch needs a lift, but does it need to be
destroyed and rebuilt? Perhaps that is not the intent of Councilmember
Tim O'Hare, but I got the impression that this was his idea for
Redevelopment during the workshop held upstairs in the city hall conference
room Monday evening. The mid-year budget talks
were televised in the council chambers earlier, but when it came to
Redevelopment, as with so much of our city issues these days, conversation
was moved off camera upstairs.
I sincerely hope Mr. O'Hare is asking for the extreme in hopes of getting a
compromise in the middle ground. I hope the city will not be spending up to
a $1 million a year promoting the city to builders, real estate agents and
businesses. We are a 60-year old city,
and we have infrastructure that needs an estimated $52 million of investment
in the next decades. Do we really have the budget to fund a full-time
person to lunch with every breathing agent, business rep to promote our
city? Do we really need this?
Mr. O'Hare feels we need to pick the brains of CEOs in area businesses,
realtors, builders here and elsewhere.
He seems to have overlooked the roomful of thoughtful citizens
gathered at the recent Community Meeting. Why not convene another
Forward Farmers Branch, uniting residents, staff, elected officials,
businesses, churches, businesses, community leaders who could look together
at who we are as a city and decide what we want to be? Why not revive the
Community Watch groups to start the conversation?
Sure. Consult with others as to what we look like from outside our borders and what we should do to improve our image, but don't give the outsiders the last, the only say.
There was talk Monday night
of having a parade, putting on an event that would help us draw attention to
our community. In the old days, we had the
Fourth of July on the West Side. We had a
parade down Valley View. We had craft fairs
on the Historical Park grounds. It's good to think about doing one or more
of these again.
Council candidate Jim Smith suggested we try to entice the Shakespeare
Festival to the Historical Park or to the acreage around Brookhaven
College. This would be good, and it would not be
a drain on our city funds. It would be a way to put our city on the map in
the North Texas area.
Council candidate Calla Davis suggested the city use some funding to
clean up what we have already in our city. Yes, we need to get the
businesses, the shops in the "Four Corners" area at Josey and Valley View to
keep their sidewalks washed and their windows attractive. We need to ensure
our codes presently on the books are enforced.
Both candidates, when I left the conversation, seemed to want to start small to develop a bigger success over time. Mr. O'Hare seems to want to perform a magic act....presto, chango...old homes gone with the flick of an ordinance or two and big new homes built in their place. He is focused right now on the Branch Crossing area, but I can see the domino effect in our future. Once the teardowns re-start in great numbers in this area, they will occur throughout the city. Yes, the teardown headaches faced by Dallas, Austin, Atlanta neighborhoods could be ours.
How about building out the Courtyards first? How about getting a
developer to start building in the DART station area? What about
West Side development? Why must everything be torn down? Couldn't we
support rehabs as well? Couldn't we encourage residents to take
better care of what they have? Unfortunately, Mr. O'Hare sees the big
dollars amassing in the city coffers as the big homes will net higher
property taxes.
Outreach to the building and real estate community begins now. There will be
a meeting with Realtor Gene Bledsoe and his friends. As I understand, some
of the city staff will be on hand at the gathering on April 25. I imagine
Tim O'Hare will be present as well.
Another thing at the top of the To Do list will be enacting changes in the
parking ordinance. It was said that the council on May 1 will be
reviewing the ordinance that would include changing the upper limit of five
vehicles allowed per household. To accommodate the volume, circular drives
were suggested! Why can't we in Farmers Branch be leaders of the 21st
Century and develop more trails throughout our city that allow for bike
riding, walking, rather than driving? Why can't we connect these trails to
the public transit station, again to encourage alternates to our use of
vehicles. Why must we increase our impervious surfaces with concrete just
to accommodate more cars? More impervious surfaces, more storm
water runoff.
We have a Comprehensive Plan. Nothing was mentioned about that this
evening. Why not review the document, change it after we decide what our
goals for tomorrow may be? For instance, why not look at changing the
zoning in the area east of Midway to accommodate high rises with a mixture
of condos, businesses and retail. This is beginning across the Tollway from
the Galleria here in Farmers Branch. Let's do more of this. Or, at least
look at this as an option.
Why not build on the mixed use we have now. For instance, each of the
quadrants of the "Four Corners" is adjacent to residences. Why not
begin to re-orient the stores, the shopping center as a whole to be accessed
more easily by the nearby residences? Mixed use and public transit
development are the ways consultants these days recommend that building
occur to decrease the over-taxed roads, clean the air and improve quality of
life in our communities. This will be done in the DART station area. Why
not consider Four Corners for mixed use development too?
The North Central Texas Council of Governments is creating a Vision
for the Region. Nothing was mentioned about this tonight while I was
present. Why not look at it before going too far with city planning? Why
reinvent the wheel?
Some more suggestions from Mr. O'Hare:
What do you think? Are these proposals a little too much too soon?
Where do we taxpayers who live here fit in to this picture? With the
system we have now, we have no say in selection of capital improvement
projects. Fire Station #3 is a done deal according to all I hear. Now we
seem to be left out of the discussion of what our city is and should be.
Depending on where you live, you might be on your way out anyway.
Kathleen Matsumura
|
|
|