Sharon Boyd, Editor/Publisher

          DallasArena.com
Your alternative to
The Dallas Managed News  
            
Gehrig Saldaña

  Home       Search     

               

BadDealLogo.gif (6018 bytes)


 


                             

8/27/07  DISD Credit Card Abuse

Wonder what's the real reason the DISD bond election will not be held until next year?

Ms. Weir's letter to the editor in the Dallas Morning News identifies the reason.  

They stole from me
Letters to the Editor, DallasNews.com, 8/25/7

Re: "86 disciplined for DISD card misuse – Termination, probation among punishments for credit abuses," Thursday Metro.

I work in a law firm and have use of the firm credit card. So does this mean if I go shopping at Neiman Marcus to buy clothes with the firm credit card, and the firm finds out, then I will either be fired, disciplined in some sort of way or demoted?

Frankly, I thought stealing something that doesn't belong to you was against the law. This is an outrage because, guess what? I pay property taxes, and these principals and teachers were shopping with my money.

Mary A. Weir, Dallas

Dr. Hinojosa has failed to sweep this issue under the carpet.  Day in and day out, it keeps resurfacing to alarm and disgust the average DISD taxpayer.

 
My question to Dr. Hinojosa on this is:  Don't you see what kind of example your leadership on the DISD credit card fraud (not misuse or abuse, the word is fraud) issue has set in place not only on the average DISD taxpayer but to the very children who now attend the DISD? 

SHAME, SHAME, & SHAME on YOU!

And to those DISD trustees who have agreed to go along with setting a low bar on this issue, this sordid episode of history in the DISD will not bode well for you either
 
Imagine being PROMOTED or simply DISCIPLINED for STEALING hundreds and thousands of DISD taxpayer dollars?  Try that on your job in the private sector and see how fast you wind up in prison!

This issue will still be hot come next year when DISD comes to the individual DISD taxpayer for their vote on the next bond election.

Additionally, under Dr. Hinojosa's watch an administrator's wife is now working under her husband. 
 

DISD couple's positions raise nepotism questions
By TAWNELL D. HOBBS / The Dallas Morning News, August 22, 2007

One pair of assignments in DISD's massive central office reorganization isn't going over well with some trustees: a husband who is chief over his wife's department.

The plan moves Patricia Viramontes to a director's job in the Transformation Management Office, headed by her husband, Arnold Viramontes. Mrs. Viramontes' supervisor will report directly to her husband.

The Dallas Independent School District strengthened its nepotism policy in the last decade in response to criticism that the payroll included too many people related to each other. But the Viramonteses' arrangement has some district trustees questioning whether the district is violating its own policy.

"It wasn't developed to do things like that," Trustee Jerome Garza said of the Viramonteses. He said DISD should have discussed the couple's assignments with the board since it sets district policy.

The nepotism policy states, "In all cases, family members shall not be in a direct supervisor/subordinate relationship."

District officials don't consider the couple's assignments to be in violation of the policy because Mr. Viramontes doesn't directly supervise his wife, DISD spokesman Jon Dahlander said. He said the district's general counsel researched the matter and made the determination.

"It's been examined, it's been reviewed, and it's not an issue," Mr. Dahlander said. "He did not recommend her for hire, and he does not directly supervise his wife."
... 
School board President Jack Lowe said he accepts the Viramonteses' arrangement, though it did raise a red flag and required some research.

...  Some school trustees are questioning the move. "I know we're trying to do the right thing," Mr. Garza said. "But in this case, we need to re-evaluate and err on the side of being more conservative. I think that this is a very liberal interpretation of our ethics."

Trustee Ron Price said board policy is clear that family members and spouses can't supervise one another, directly or indirectly. He believes that Mr. Viramontes is in a supervisory role over his whole department.

"So it opens up the question, 'How many other administrators in the school district have spouses or family members that have been hired by the district?' " Mr. Price said.

Trustee Edwin Flores said he favors a nepotism policy that would forbid family members from working for the district. He said he believes DISD employs hundreds of relatives.  ... 

Nepotism rules supreme at DISD.  I've been told but can't confirm that when Arnold Viramontes was Director of Technology for DISD (the position prior to his current one), Viramentes himself may have hired his wife to work directly under himI understand employees who worked under Viramentes  would quickly verify this. 

But, let's get down to nitty-gritty on this subject. An open records request from individuals, LULAC councils, Dallas.Org, DallasArena.com, or media requesting Patricia Viramontes' original application and all the paperwork related to her original hire in the district would seal the deal on this subject if in fact, her husband was the one who hired her.
 
Glad to see DISD trustees Jerome Garza, Ron Price and Dr. Edwin Flores have a strong position on this issue.
 
Gehrig M. Saldaña
Vice President
Dallas LULAC Council 4496 
 
 

                                        

    





                               

 

  Ward politics is the Devil's key to the soul of the city council.  It is how some council members got themselves in trouble in the past.  It is the bait that will get others in trouble in the future. 4/6/8