Sharon Boyd, Editor/Publisher

          DallasArena.com
Your alternative to
The Dallas Managed News  
            
Ray Hunt's backing Ed Oakley!

  Home       Search     

               

BadDealLogo.gif (6018 bytes)


 

James Waghorne
Jesse Diaz endorses Betty Culbreath

                             

5/21/7  Thank you gesture for the $6.3 million tax abatement Ed delivered.

The past several days, the blogs and my telephone line have been hot and heavy with who's endorsing Ed Oakley.  A couple of the rumored endorsements turned out to be bogus.  Hopefully, a couple more will also be wrong.

One that seems to be legit is that big time, First Baptist Church member Ray Hunt, is endorsing Ed Oakley and will deliver his machine of John Scovell, et al to try to get Ed elected.  There's a history between Ed and Ray and John.

  1. Spike Dance
    The Hunt Oil people were shakin' their booties at City Hall last week
    By Jim Schutze Published: October 27, 2005
    Hey, I wish you could have been at last week's Dallas City Council briefing. It was Friday night football. John Scovell, a lobbyist who had just won a huge city tax cut for Hunt Oil, was down in the end zone spikin' the ball and doin' a hula dance.
   "I guess this is my celebration," he said, standing in front of the city council with an Oprah Winfrey mike in his hand. Earlier in the day, Scovell had mildly taunted Mayor Laura Miller ("Do you understand?"), but now at the end of the day with his big tax cut in hand, he was pouring it on.
   Calling her "Professor Miller" and describing her to her face in front of the council as "possessed," Scovell was twitchin' itchy with it, like a cocky high school quarterback giving the finger to the team he just beat.
   Only thing is, I'm sitting in the upper deck going over the notes I made on my program, and I keep coming up with a score that shows maybe Miller won this game. And if she won, how come Scovell's out there in the end zone waving his I.Q. around?
   We always begin with a core perception of City Hall, after all. Miller was elected mayor the first time three years ago because a majority of the middle class voters in the city believed downtown had been run into the ground by arrogant rich white guys building sports venues; the streets had gone to hell; and half the council was crooked. People wanted somebody with a sharp pencil to go down there and count the damn money.
...
Miller argued that the council should think about what it's starting when it flips one business an 80 percent tax cut. Her main argument was that other developers were already calling her demanding to know where their 80 percent tax cut was.
   Miller never said don't do the land swap. I listened closely. She said do the land swap. But count the money. Don't just give them a blank check. Negotiate.
   She went through a PowerPoint presentation on the history of the original Reunion Arena deal, ticking off a laundry list of unfulfilled promises and obsolete covenants, including air rights over a city-owned garage that still belong to Hunt Oil, for some reason, and a lease for the upper floors of the old Union Station, a city-owned property that Hunt continues to control in spite of never having done anything successful with it.
   Miller said if the city is going to give Hunt what it wants on the land swap, then the city should use the talks as a chance to straighten out the kinks in the original 31-year-old "master agreement" with Hunt Oil on the land in that corner of downtown.
...
But that was not what Scovell had in mind at all. He said the structure of the talks between Hunt and the city was strict: Only Hunt's demands for changes in the 31-year-old "master agreement" were to be discussed. There could be no revisiting old issues the city might want to discuss in the master agreement itself.
... Scovell grabbed the Oprah mike again and teed off: "What I'm having a tough time doing, and some of y'all know me better than others, is resisting jumping up and correcting the statements that are being made that are not accurate. So you are walking out of here with a bunch of assumptions from Professor Miller about this project that are not factual."
... Meanwhile, the portion of the city council currently under FBI investigation for bribery and corruption is blowing air kisses across the room to Scovell and making speeches to the effect of, "Forget the mayor. Deal with us, Mr. Moneypants. We won't take a sharp pencil to you. We don't even use pencils." ...

What Jim doesn't talk about in Spike Dance was the behavior of Bill Blaydes and Ed Oakley at the same briefing session.  Ed Oakley started squealing and screeching at Mayor Miller.  That was his famous "Me, Me, Me" speech, where he pounded on the table.  Bill Blaydes went wacko as well.  They could not believe that Laura Miller would challenge the wishes of Ray Hunt as delivered from on high by Moses John Scovell.  See Ray Hunt's City Council:  Those with the Gold - Rule!  Here are a couple of excerpts:

Ed Oakley - As the most self-absorbed and selfish person on the council, he's in a special position to call someone else power hungry, which he said about Mayor Miller.  Says because we have given so many other tax abatements, we can't stop now.  In other words, we have made so many mistakes, there's no point in learning from our errors and stopping our bad behavior.  In between running for Mayor and acting as Hunt's City Hall consultant and spokesperson, Ed Oakley doesn't have much spare time.  He was completely emotional and out of control, when he should have directed his anger at Lying Ryan Evans and Hunt's John Scovell for lying to the council that we were about to lose Hunt Oil to the suburbs.
 
Ed Oakley said the Mayor was all about herself and not about the council.  When Ed Oakley represented District 6 while he was running for District 3, he designated 83% ($2.5 million) of District 6's "discretionary" bond funds for projects in his new District 3 -- most of which went to Kessler and Stevens Park wants.  The old District 6 included West Dallas, Bachman Lake area, Oak Cliff -- all areas in dire need of side walks and curbing, but he spent our designated bond money on a sound wall for Stevens Park to help his campaign for District 3 against Mark Housewright.  DISHONEST!

District 6 is one of the poorest districts in Dallas.  It was under Ed Oakley's District 6, as well.  There were so many places where that $2.5 million could have been spent in District 6.  I confronted Ed about it, and he did his emotional routine as he defended diverting that money from District 6.  He said he spent it in the District 6 as it was configured when he was elected.  That was just a flat out lie.  Stevens Park was in the old District 3 and is in the current District 3.

It doesn't shock me that the soul less Son of a Bigamist Ray Hunt would endorse Ed Oakley.  Some of the other rumored endorsers have been surprising.  Max Wells?  If Wells endorses Oakley, it is only because he was told to do so by Ray Hunt's goon squad. 

Rufus Shaw of DallasBlog.com has a great commentary. 
The Endorsement Crisis.  I don't agree with all of his surmises, but he has insider opinions that certainly start conversations flowing around the politico circuit.

Michael Davis and Mary Hasan say the Black vote is not Don Hill's to give to Ed Oakley.  From DallasBlog.com, Can Oakley Win? by Scott Bennett:

Mary Hasan , May 15, 2007
   People will probably be surprised at the number of votes Leppert gets from the African American community. A lot of us believe that Ed's word doesn't mean anything and see thru his platform. Ed knows that in our community the senior citizens vote heavily, so he makes reducing taxes for seniors an issue. I was born and raised here and from talking to the people I know, they will be either supporting Leppert or not voting for a mayoral candidate. Some of us don't care who endorses Oakley, we will not support him. As Rufus Shaw would say, that's the real deal.
Michael Davis , May 17, 2007

I agree with Mary. Oakley's campaign is about pandering to people's fears (apartments, seniors, those "big bad people in North Dallas"). Ed's consistently voted against things that are important to Black voters. The pastors also have influence and he won't get any real support from that arena.

I am certainly not one to dismiss Ed Oakley.  I know he's smart and ambitious.  He loves campaigning.  He loves the action and the challenge.  He just doesn't think people remember what he has done as a councilman.  Like voting for a confessed and convicted felon (Old Al Lipscomb) to be appointed to the Police Review Board.  Like supporting a $6.3 million tax abatement to Ray Hunt, who has been sucking at our municipal teat for 20 years.

A journalist who shall remain anonymous said something interesting this week.  He said since Tom Leppert is a wealthy man in his own right, there's a possibility he might actually tell some of these tax abatement addicts that enough is enough, you need to pay your own way.  But with Ed, there will never be an end to his eagerness to give our tax dollars away to billionaires and wannabe-billionaires.  Look what giving $6.3 million to Ray Hunt has done for Ed!

As I wrote in Why is Ed Oakley trying to divide the city?, I was flabbergasted that Ed would mail out a flyer to South Dallas voters that asked:

WHO ARE REPUBLICANS?
WHO ARE DEMOCRATS?
WHERE ARE THEY FROM?
WHAT WILL THEY DO FOR SOUTHERN DALLAS?


Now, he's touting the endorsement of North Dallas Republican Ray Hunt, who has never done a thing for Southern Dallas or anyone else.  Ray Hunt takes.  When Ray Hunt gives, there are strings attached. 

The people trying to block Angela Hunt's TrinityVote petition drive say the Trinity Project is a fragile combination of many integral parts, pull one string (like the Tollroad which was not included in the 1998 vote) and the whole thing could unravel.  In that same vein of thought, James (Chip) Northrup had an insightful comment this week:

Ed O would be beholdin' to every demagogue in the South Side, every power broker in the North Side, and every lobbyist in between.
 
In short, a compromised mess of a man from Day One.

Pull one thread, and he would unravel.

If you are going to be mayor, you should be beholding to the people who elected you.  Ed displayed his lack of loyalty to the Northwest Dallas precincts that elected him to District 6 by a 95% margin.  They did not see him again.  He did not help fight the sex clubs on Northwest Highway.  He did not get funding for sidewalks on Brockbank or Community, as our Councilman Steve Salazar has done.  He did spend over $2 million in another district that would have helped get Northwest Dallas school children out of ditches as they walk to school.

This runoff election will be different than others in the past because of the dynamics involved with these two candidates.  None of the other 9 candidates who did not make the runoff can deliver a block of votes to either Tom Leppert or Ed Oakley.  You had Commissioner John Wiley Price supporting Max Wells, and that was worth what?  Now, Commissioner Price is backing Ed Oakley. 

No North Dallas Republican can deliver a block of votes to Ed Oakley.  All the Leppert campaign has to do is make sure Ed's South Dallas flyer gets distributed to North Dallas Republicans. 

If you look at the DMN color-coded map of how Dallas precincts voted, you can see Tom Leppert did well all over the city.  Gary Griffith voters may not be North Dallas, but they are Republicans.

It was wrong of Ed to interject partisan politics into this non-partisan race, but that mistake is going to come back and bite him in the butt.

sb

                                        

    





                               

 

  Ward politics is the Devil's key to the soul of the city council.  It is how some council members got themselves in trouble in the past.  It is the bait that will get others in trouble in the future. 4/6/8