|
|
|
5/17/7 City Thoughts
Sadly, Tom Leppert's
strong point is that he is NOT Ed Oakley. Ed has
been such a disappointment, and I fear that he
will continue to be. I'm still on the fence
for my mayoral vote.
I cannot figure out who the puppeter is pulling
Ed's strings. Do you have any clue? Is it big business?
The mob? Developers? ...
I have heard it may be developers because he has
bought up (either alone or with others) key parcels of
real estate directly in the path of the proposed tollway and other
Trinity River developments. Doesn't this just stink of Bobby Folsom and the
North Dallas Tollway extension and Far North Dallas annexation that forced
the City to buy millions of dollars of land owned by Folsom and Jack Evans?
"Old Heads" like us, Cay Kolb and others who
still REMEMBER stuff like this are ignored or dismissed
by decision makers who think they know better that us. They wreak havoc,
collect their fees and move on. Remember
City Manager Chuck Anderson and his ilk? He went on to ruin DART like he
did City Hall.
By the way,
are you keeping up with what the City (Dev. Sers.) is trying to palm off on
us in the way of "Form Based Codes (Zoning)"?
Despite the moderate successes of the Oak Lawn PD, 51-A
has worked out pretty well. The Oak Lawn PD 183 should have
transitioned to 51-A, but I fully understand the distrust of the City that
made the Oak Lawn Committee
and others not want to take the risk. This new "trend of the moment" that
FBC's proposes is ill-conceived for Dallas.
I think a group of consultants (who stand to make the MOST money ever
made by strapping City Hall with a code that will NOT work) has sold the
Manager and Council a bill of goods.
Just look for a public meeting near you. They
are proposing this as a way of developing the
Trinity River Corridor with mixed uses and urban forms THEY think "look
cool". However, every time you ask the
staff a question about how this really works or will
work for Dallas, they answer by saying, "It's too early to say" or "we don't
really know yet". Although I had already researched the
issue on the internet and with a zoning consultant, I asked the lead
planner on this what the track record was for FBC's and he had to admit that
it has never been proposed on the scale that Dallas is looking at.
Based on what we were able to find out, in
Dallas, they are recommending a minimum of 40 acres (this comes from the
consultant side). The cost to develop concept designs and a draft document
is between $120K and $300K.
My prediction? This will all die a natural
death from lack of interest (and CASH) by
landowners and
developers.
Darryl Baker |
|
|