Sharon Boyd, Editor/Publisher

          DallasArena.com
Your alternative to
The Dallas Managed News  
            
Timing is Everything

  Home       Search     

               

BadDealLogo.gif (6018 bytes)


 

Rad Field
Champ's Not So Excellent Adventure

                             

02/23/07  Who gets the last laugh?

In
Issues & Dilemmas, I talked about several matters where the participants seemed to be in contradictory positions.  The late night news, Wednesday, 2/21/07,  verified my observations.

It has been looking like the Trinity Bondoogle is going forward, despite new information that would make a sensible person reconsider.  This week, however, things have not gone so swimmingly for those who would put our city at risk of a natural disaster on the scale of Katrina.  CBS11's Jack Fink has done a great job explaining the catastrophe that has hit the pro-Trinity mafia:

Proposed Dallas Toll Road May Be Sunk
Jack Fink reporting, 2/21/22

(CBS 11 News) DALLAS The proposed toll road designed to relieve major traffic congestion in Downtown Dallas may be sunk. That's because the nearly $1 billion road is raising concerns that could make it impossible to build.
... To relieve traffic, the city and the North Texas Tollway Authority want to build a $1 billion toll road in the proposed Trinity Park. It would bypass downtown and connect 183 and I-30, I-35E, and I-45.
   But now the plan could be taking on water, and one city council member is alarmed. "I'm extremely troubled by it, and I hope we all are," said Dallas City Council Member Angela Hunt. "This to me has just become a bloated project, a dangerous project."
   Dangerous, she said, because the Army Corps of Engineers, which controls the flood control system in the Trinity, has raised concerns. It's ordered the city to move the road away from the levee protecting the city from a flood.
  
The agency has also said it reserves the right to shut the road, and possibly destroy parts of it, if it has to repair the levees. The Tollway Authority said that jeopardizes the road because investors wouldn't buy bonds to build it.
   "It's going to have to be worked out, or we're going to have a difficult time moving forward on it," said Paul Wageman, NTTA board chairman.
   But the Army Corps of Engineers said there's nothing to be worked out. "We have to be able to get in no matter what," said Gene Rice, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. "It's not really a negotiable point of whether we can get in or not."
   If the Tollway Authority doesn't build the road to relieve all of the traffic, who will? "If the transportation people are serious that this really needs to be done, we will find a way to make it work," said Jill Jordan, Assistant City Manager, Dallas.
   No one knows yet who would build the road if the Tollway Authority says no, but the city could receive state and federal tax dollars to do so.

Uh, No -- If state or federal tax dollars were available for the river road, the road guys would not be converting existing highways to toll roads to pay for new construction.  I am beginning to feel cautiously optimistic that we were accurate in our early predictions of String Thing Bridges over a sewer trough.  The bridges are ridiculous and ridiculously expensive, but no one will drown because of them.  If we are going to waste money, the bridges are the least dangerous way to waste tax dollars.  Now, I'm not convinced any of it will happen, after all.

I was talking to a real smart (Trinity Project wise) guy a week or so ago about all of this.  I told him I don't understand how the new Calatrava design could be so much cheaper to build than the original plan.   Was the original that over-bloated?  We know it was bloated, but really --.   My smart friend says TXDOT is wondering about the numbers, too.

So, we may not get a river toll road or String Thing Bridges.  Maybe, thousands won't drown in a few years when the levees fail.

Simultaneously, everyone gets to step back and take a deep breath over the coal plant hearings.  I don't think anyone on either side wanted or expected the hearings to be delayed until June.  The old adage of "careful what you wish for" seems appropriate.

Coal hearings delayed; Judges postpone review of TXU plant permits by four months
Wednesday, February 21, 2007 By ELIZABETH SOUDER / The Dallas Morning News

AUSTIN ? The judges hearing TXU Corp.'s case for coal-fired power plant permits slowed the process down by four months, bowing to a last-minute court ruling that the governor's fast-track permit schedule is probably unconstitutional.
   Administrative law judges Kerry Sullivan and Henry Card decided Wednesday ? the day the formal permit hearings were scheduled to begin ? that the six-month deadline Gov. Rick Perry ordered for power plant permits is too speedy for some groups that oppose the permits to develop their arguments.
....  Judge Sullivan said.  But, he added, opposing groups that couldn't keep up with the quick pace need enough time to develop their strategies.
...  The hearings encompass seven of the 11 new coal plants TXU proposes to build, and the slowdown could delay by months the date when TXU could build the plants and begin generating revenue with them.
   On Tuesday, state District Judge Stephen Yelenosky granted an injunction on the hearing officers, preventing them from following the governor's fast-track order and instructing them to reconsider the hearing schedule. Judge Yelenosky was ruling on a case against the governor brought by four groups that oppose coal-plant pollution.
.... John Riley, a lawyer with Vinson & Elkins who is representing TXU, .... "Given the circumstances and given what we've heard from the parties today that they haven't had enough time ? [do] whatever the parties want, as long as we get to try this case on the merits," Mr. Riley said when the judges asked if he objected to the new schedule.
...  "I certainly don't want to leave the opportunity for another motion on that date that says 'I didn't have enough time,' " Mr. Riley said.
...  Instead of beginning formal testimony Wednesday, the judges heard arguments on whether some topics should be part of the hearing, including carbon dioxide, cleaner coal technology such as coal gasification, and whether the state needs the proposed plants.
... Steve Susman, a lawyer representing a coalition of cities that oppose the permits, questioned TXU's motives for the plants, arguing that the company chiefly wants to emit more carbon dioxide before the greenhouse gas is regulated.
...  TXU says "they need to provide Texas with affordable power to meet its energy needs," Mr. Susman said.
   "We intend to impeach that and show that what they're really trying to do here is minimize the consequence to them of carbon dioxide regulation when it is imposed by the federal government, which they expect to be imminent," said Mr. Susman, who is working for free for the coalition created by Dallas Mayor Laura Miller.
...  Mr. Riley, who represents TXU, responded with sarcasm: "I think we can talk about the backroom deals, the intrigue of a company trying to get its air permits. It's very dramatic, and I appreciate the drama."
   But, Mr. Riley said, TXU's internal discussions about a carbon dioxide strategy are typical of any company that is trying to identify trends and prepare for them.
   Further, Mr. Riley said, such topics aren't relevant to the plant permits. The state doesn't regulate carbon dioxide, Texas doesn't have any coal gasification plants yet, and environmental regulators aren't in a position to know if Texas needs more power plants. ...
.

CBS11's Bud Gillett concluded his report with the thought that was on several minds when we heard the decision delaying the hearings to June 27th:

Coal Plant hearings delayed until June 27th
2/21/7, Bud Gillett reporting,

... June 27th start date means she will no longer be mayor when the hearings actually start.  A bitter sweet realization.

Mayor Miller has put her usual high energy into blocking the new coal plants.  She has literally been everywhere.  There is no way the opposition would have had its success without her charisma and star power.  Even though I don't see the coal plants as the threat the Mayor's people fear, you have to admire her ability to assemble an army and keep them focused on whatever goal she has.  Who else can the opposition put in front of their effort?  Laura Miller can always find an army for whatever cause she is pushing -- from wading pools to mayoral campaigns to stopping new coal plants.

People who don't like Laura Miller think everything will be better once she is no longer mayor.  It won't -- and we won't have anyone with her charisma.  She may not be a consensus builder on the council, but she's certainly an army builder.  This mayoral election is exactly what we can expect from anyone elected out of the 22 announced candidates.  Ho Hum!  That may be a good thing, but it will be boring.

I'm backing Darrell Jordan, because he is what Dallas needs right now.  He is a consensus builder.  Still, we are going to miss Mayor Miller.  She has represented the city well, even when I disagreed with her. 

It's hard for me to understand Mayor Miller's total acceptance of the pie in the sky technology proposed for the Trinity Project, when she is so afraid of the coal plants. 

   No Coal Plant Hearings Till June. Breathe Easy. Get It? Aw?
   2/21/07 Robert Wilonsky 
   So, those coal-plant permit hearings didn?t begin today after all ? and won?t, for another four months, as per the State Office of Administrative Hearings? decision to postpone the proceedings till June 27 per State District Judge Stephen Yelenosky?s ruling yesterday that Governor Rick Perry ?lacks [the] authority? to issue an executive order that fast-tracks the coal-plant permit process. One interesting note from all this: Today?s decision means that when the hearings do commence again, Mayor Laura Miller won?t be mayor anymore.
  
Miller, who founded the Texas Cities for Clean Air Coalition in September and raised the $755,000 needed to wage war against TXU and other coal-plant comers, told Unfair Park last night that should the hearings be postponed, she doesn?t know what her role will be in the anti-TXU fight. She said the city council would have to appoint her to be the city?s representative to the TCCAC. Barring that, well, she will likely be involved, she?s just not sure to what extent.
   ?But, you know, I do want to keep active and do something. I don?t want to run for political office. I have no interest in doing that. So, we?ll see. I wouldn?t mind?I just don?t know.?

If the new council does not appoint Miller as the city's representative to the TCCAC, who would they appoint?  There is no one else who is more up to speed on the subject, but it's hard to imagine a new mayor wanting Laura Miller stealing their spotlight. 

sb

 

                                        

    





                            

 

  Ward politics is the Devil's key to the soul of the city council.  It is how some council members got themselves in trouble in the past.  It is the bait that will get others in trouble in the future. 4/6/8