|
Rad Field Champ's Not So Excellent Adventure
| |
02/23/07 Who gets the
last laugh?
In
Issues & Dilemmas,
I talked about several matters where the participants seemed to be in
contradictory positions. The late night news, Wednesday, 2/21/07, verified my observations.
It has been looking like the Trinity Bondoogle is going forward, despite new information that would make a sensible person reconsider. This
week, however, things have not gone so swimmingly for those who would put our
city at risk of a natural disaster on the scale of Katrina. CBS11's Jack
Fink has done a great job explaining the catastrophe that has hit
the pro-Trinity mafia:
 |
|
 |
(CBS 11 News) DALLAS The
proposed toll road designed to relieve major traffic congestion in Downtown
Dallas may be sunk. That's because the nearly $1 billion road is raising
concerns that could make it impossible to build.
... To relieve traffic, the city and the North
Texas Tollway Authority want to build a $1 billion toll road in the proposed
Trinity Park. It would bypass downtown and connect 183 and I-30, I-35E, and
I-45.
But now the plan could be taking on
water, and one city council member is alarmed. "I'm extremely troubled by
it, and I hope we all are," said Dallas City Council Member Angela Hunt.
"This to me has just become a bloated project, a dangerous project."
Dangerous, she said, because the Army
Corps of Engineers, which controls the flood control system in the Trinity,
has raised concerns. It's ordered the city to move the road away from the
levee protecting the city from a flood.
The agency has also said it
reserves the right to shut the road, and possibly destroy parts of it, if it
has to repair the levees. The Tollway Authority said that jeopardizes the
road because investors wouldn't buy bonds to build it.
"It's going to have to be worked out,
or we're going to have a difficult time moving forward on it," said Paul
Wageman, NTTA board chairman.
But the Army Corps of Engineers said
there's nothing to be worked out. "We have to be able to get in no matter
what," said Gene Rice, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. "It's not really a
negotiable point of whether we can get in or not."
If the Tollway Authority doesn't
build the road to relieve all of the traffic, who will? "If the
transportation people are serious that this really needs to be done, we will
find a way to make it work," said Jill Jordan, Assistant City Manager,
Dallas.
No one knows yet who would build the
road if the Tollway Authority says no, but the city could receive state and
federal tax dollars to do so. |
Uh, No -- If state or
federal tax dollars were available for the river road, the road guys would not be converting existing
highways to toll roads to pay for new construction. I am beginning to feel
cautiously optimistic that we were accurate in our early predictions of String
Thing Bridges over a sewer trough. The bridges are ridiculous and
ridiculously expensive, but no one will drown because of them. If we are
going to waste money, the bridges are the least dangerous way to waste tax
dollars. Now, I'm not convinced any of it will happen, after all.
I was talking to a real smart (Trinity Project wise) guy a week or so ago about all
of this. I told him I don't understand how the new Calatrava design could be so
much cheaper to build than the original plan. Was the original that
over-bloated? We know it was bloated, but really --. My smart friend says TXDOT is wondering about the numbers, too.
So, we may not get a river toll road or String Thing Bridges. Maybe,
thousands won't drown in a few years when the levees fail.
Simultaneously, everyone gets to step back and take a deep breath over the coal
plant hearings. I don't think anyone on either side wanted or expected the hearings to be
delayed until June. The old adage of "careful what you wish for" seems
appropriate.
 |
Coal hearings delayed;
Judges postpone review of TXU plant permits by four months
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
By
ELIZABETH SOUDER / The Dallas Morning News
|
AUSTIN ? The judges hearing TXU Corp.'s case for coal-fired power plant permits slowed the process down by four months, bowing to a last-minute court ruling that the governor's fast-track permit schedule is probably unconstitutional.
Administrative law judges Kerry Sullivan and Henry Card decided Wednesday ? the day the formal permit hearings were scheduled to begin ? that the six-month deadline Gov. Rick Perry ordered for power plant permits is too speedy for some groups that oppose the permits to develop their arguments.
.... Judge Sullivan said. But, he added, opposing groups that couldn't keep up with the quick pace need enough time to develop their strategies.
... The hearings encompass seven of the 11 new coal plants TXU proposes to build, and the slowdown could delay by months the date when TXU could build the plants and begin generating revenue with them.
On Tuesday, state District Judge Stephen Yelenosky granted an injunction on the hearing officers, preventing them from following the governor's fast-track order and instructing them to reconsider the hearing schedule. Judge Yelenosky was ruling on a case against the governor brought by four groups that oppose coal-plant pollution.
.... John Riley, a lawyer with Vinson & Elkins who is representing TXU, .... "Given the circumstances and given what we've heard from the parties today that they haven't had enough time ? [do] whatever the parties want, as long as we get to try this case on the merits," Mr. Riley said when the judges asked if he objected to the new schedule.
... "I certainly don't want to leave the opportunity for another motion on that date that says 'I didn't have enough time,' " Mr. Riley said.
... Instead of beginning formal testimony Wednesday, the judges heard arguments on whether some topics should be part of the hearing, including carbon dioxide, cleaner coal technology such as coal gasification, and whether the state needs the proposed plants.
... Steve Susman, a lawyer representing a coalition of cities that oppose the permits, questioned TXU's motives for the plants, arguing that the company chiefly wants to emit more carbon dioxide before the greenhouse gas is regulated.
... TXU says "they need to provide Texas with affordable power to meet its energy needs," Mr. Susman said.
"We intend to impeach that and show that what they're really trying to do here is minimize the consequence to them of carbon dioxide regulation when it is imposed by the federal government, which they expect to be imminent," said Mr. Susman, who is working for free for the coalition created by Dallas Mayor Laura Miller.
... Mr. Riley, who represents TXU, responded with sarcasm: "I think we can talk about the backroom deals, the intrigue of a company trying to get its air permits. It's very dramatic, and I appreciate the drama."
But, Mr. Riley said, TXU's internal discussions about a carbon dioxide strategy are typical of any company that is trying to identify trends and prepare for them.
Further, Mr. Riley said, such topics aren't relevant to the plant permits. The state doesn't regulate carbon dioxide, Texas doesn't have any coal gasification plants yet, and environmental regulators aren't in a position to know if Texas needs more power plants. ....
|
CBS11's Bud Gillett concluded
his report with the thought that was on several minds when we heard the decision
delaying the hearings to June 27th:
 |
Coal Plant hearings delayed until June
27th
2/21/7, Bud Gillett reporting,
|
 |
|
... June 27th
start date means she will no longer be mayor when the hearings actually
start. A bitter sweet realization. |
Mayor Miller has put her usual
high energy into blocking the new coal plants. She has literally been
everywhere. There is no way the opposition would have had its success
without her charisma and star power. Even though I don't see the
coal plants as the threat the Mayor's people fear, you have to admire her
ability to assemble an army and keep them focused on whatever goal she has.
Who else can the opposition put in front of their effort? Laura Miller can
always find an army for whatever cause she is pushing -- from wading pools to
mayoral campaigns to stopping new coal plants.
People who don't like Laura Miller think everything will be better once she is
no longer mayor. It won't -- and we won't have anyone with her charisma.
She may not be a consensus builder on the council, but she's certainly an army
builder. This mayoral election is exactly what we can expect from anyone
elected out of the 22 announced candidates. Ho Hum! That may be a
good thing, but it will be boring.
I'm backing Darrell Jordan, because he is what Dallas needs right now.
He is a consensus builder. Still, we are going to miss Mayor Miller.
She has represented the city well, even when I disagreed with her.
It's hard for me to understand Mayor Miller's total acceptance of the pie in the sky
technology proposed for the Trinity Project, when she is so afraid of the coal
plants.
 |
No Coal Plant
Hearings Till June.
Breathe Easy. Get
It? Aw?
2/21/07 Robert
Wilonsky
|
So, those coal-plant permit hearings didn?t begin today after all ? and won?t, for another four months, as per the State Office of Administrative Hearings? decision to postpone the proceedings till June 27 per State District Judge Stephen Yelenosky?s ruling yesterday that Governor Rick Perry ?lacks [the] authority? to issue an executive order that fast-tracks the coal-plant permit process. One interesting note from all this: Today?s decision means that when the hearings do commence again, Mayor Laura Miller won?t be mayor anymore.
Miller, who founded the Texas Cities for Clean Air Coalition in September and raised the $755,000 needed to wage war against TXU and other coal-plant comers, told Unfair Park last night that should the hearings be postponed, she doesn?t know what her role will be in the anti-TXU fight. She said the city council would have to appoint her to be the city?s representative to the TCCAC. Barring that, well, she will likely be involved, she?s just not sure to what extent.
?But, you know, I do want to keep active and do something. I don?t want to run for political office. I have no interest in doing that. So, we?ll see. I wouldn?t mind?I just don?t know.?
|
If the new council does not
appoint Miller as the city's representative to the TCCAC, who would they
appoint? There is no one else who is more up to speed on the subject, but
it's hard to imagine a new mayor wanting Laura Miller stealing their spotlight.
sb
| |

|